[guest post by JVW]

I don’t want to step on Dana’s Weekend Open Thread, but I thought that since we are marking the twenty-five years anniversary of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks, a separate open thread might be important and provide a dedicated area where we can all share our thoughts.

One quarter-century ago today I awoke early with the intention of driving out to Riverside to meet with some customers. As I recall, my morning alarm was set to KFI, a talk station found at AM 640 in the Los Angeles area. I vaguely recall hearing something about a plane crash as I groggily stumbled my way to the shower, but maybe that’s a false memory all these years later. What I do know is that by the time I emerged from the bathroom, having showered and shaved, both American flight 11 and United flight 175 had hit their respective towers. Within the next hour came news of American fight 77 which had crashed at the Pentagon and United flight 93 which had inexplicably crashed in rural Pennsylvania. We would soon learn about the heroism of the flight 93 passengers, which President Bush would call the first counter-attack in the War on Terror. It goes without saying that I never made it to Riverside.

My sister was living in New York at the time, and every day she would ride the Number One or Number Three subway from 72nd Street to her office, emerging within blocks of the site of the Twin Towers. Those were the days before everyone had a cellphone, and my sister was one of those who did not. Between that and the phone lines being mostly down, we had no idea where she was. My parents called me, their demeanor somewhere between concerned and frantic, asking if I had heard from her which I of course had not. We spent the better part of the day worrying about her until she managed to borrow a cellphone and call me around 3:00 pm. She had been sequestered at the subway stop at South Ferry for several hours, before being allowed to walk home up the East Side which of course took a few hours.

I spent the rest of the morning into the early afternoon in my apartment. I had the TV on, but I found that the Bill Handel Show on KFI was the most informative of all of the news sources. Handel’s show usually ran from 5:00 am until 9:00 am, before yielding to Rush Limbaugh, but that day Handel stayed on air for somewhere between twelve to sixteen hours, providing really solid insight and utilizing his impressive rolodex to bring on very informative guests to discuss what was going on and what would likely be the aftermath. I’ve always held a great deal of respect for the job he did that gloomy day.

Towards the end of the afternoon and frustrated at my feelings of helplessness, I hit upon the idea of going to the American Red Cross Blood Center and giving a donation. Naturally, a lot of other people had the same idea, and I arrived to a line of donors close to 100 deep. The ARC had called in all of their workers and every single donor chair was occupied. I waited for a couple of hours to get in, and a local restaurant, the Mexican Riviera Restaurant, delivered free bean and cheese burritos to us, which I thought was an incredibly classy gesture. I was a bit taken aback at the fact that some people in line were happily chatting and even laughing on what I thought was a truly somber day, but I guess I understood that people deal with tragic events in different ways. I eventually was able to make my donation, after which I headed home. Word starting coming in of locals who had been on both of the flights that hit the Towers, which was expected given that three of the four flights were destined for Los Angeles.

I went to bed late that night feeling very glum. I was a couple of months shy of 32 and I had not served in the armed forces, so I knew it wasn’t going to be me carrying a rifle in Afghanistan. But I couldn’t help but think about all of the young people whose lives would be interrupted by dangerous overseas service. Some of them hold elective and appointed office today. It’s appropriate that we take a moment to reflect upon all aspects of the day: the evil depravity, the horror of watching events unfold, the heroism of the first responders, the momentary sense of national unity which would eventually evaporate into rancor.

Twenty-five years later we are a much different country than we were before those airplanes took off from Boston, Washington, and Newark, so much so that it’s become something of a cliche to discuss “pre-9/11” and “post-9/11.” Perhaps in a world beset with strife, ancient hatreds, and radicalism an epoch-changing event like this was inevitable, but I’m sorry it came at the dawn of a new millennium and that it has had such a huge impact upon us ever since.

– JVW

[guest post by Dana]

Let’s go!

First news item

About Trump’s pledged $5,000 for every American adult, if Republicans control the House and Senate after the midterms:

Mr. Trump says he doesn’t think Congress would need to approve the payments, which he called “a great infusion” — money he says would have to be spent in the U.S., not other countries.

Fink: Mr. Trump, last night you proposed “Trump Dividends,” giving every American adult citizen $5,000, and I’m wondering if Congress would need to approve that?

. . .

Trump: Well, we think not. I think they will do it if we needed it. But we think not. The country is doing so well, we’ve taken in trillions of dollars in tariffs and other things. We have now over $20 trillion worth of manufacturing plants and other investments being made in the United States, which is far greater than ever before. And we think it’s something that’ll be good. We do have one proviso, and that’s that the money be spent… people spend their money in the United States. We don’t want to have that money spent in other countries. We think it’s something that’s really good, popular and it’s a great infusion.

Second news item

Swearing loyalty to Trump, per his directive:

“Please raise your right hand,” Trump commanded the crowd in Dallas. “I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States.”

The crowd repeated the line back to him.
Not the country. Not the Constitution. Trump had his supporters pledge themselves to Donald Trump, while he stood before them with his own hand raised.

But the cultlike spectacle was only getting started.

Trump continued feeding the audience lines to repeat, directing them to promise that they would round up their families and friends to vote in November. He then led them into something even more disturbing.

“I don’t care if I’m registered or not. I’m going to try,” Trump said. “And cheat like hell like they do.”

The crowd obediently echoed his words.

Then the Christian icon whose favorite book is the Bible, went for gold:

“You know what happens if you don’t vote?” he asked. “You go to hell. You know that? Okay? You go to hell.”

Trump: So Please raise your right hand: I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States

Crowd: I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States…

Trump: I’m going to try and cheat like hell like they do. https://t.co/umehtVKUr7

— Acyn (@Acyn) September 11, 2026

Cult? What cult?

Third news item

More checks to go out to Americans before midterms:

The Trump administration will give $500 to nearly 1 million Americans who lost income-based subsidies that helped reduce health insurance costs, according to a Thursday White House announcement.

The refunds will go out next month. The announcement comes less than two months before the November midterm elections, where skyrocketing health costs have become a key campaign issue, and after the White House opposed efforts to extend Biden-era enhanced subsidies last year.

“Today’s actions directly refund the Americans most exposed to the higher costs imposed by the Biden Administration’s gross mismanagement of Obamacare,” according to a White House fact sheet.

The refunds, first reported by Axios on Wednesday, will go to people who earn too much to qualify for an income-based subsidy to lower their health insurance costs.

Fourth news item

Today’s Republican Party:

Less than two months before the midterms, Republicans are fighting roughly 200 legal battles to try to impact elections, including several cases in which the GOP isn’t officially participating but is paying legal fees or advising on strategy.

Driving the news: The Republican National Committee’s vast roster of cases includes efforts to tighten voter ID rules in Montana, decrease ballot drop-off locations in Georgia, increase scrutiny of voter lists in New Jersey and Delaware, and boost access for election observers and challengers elsewhere.

Fifth news item

AI warnings:

OpenAI and Anthropic researchers are ramping up calls for an AI slowdown and warning of existential risks to humanity after the resignation of a researcher at Anthropic fueled fresh scrutiny.

The concerns started after Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon said Tuesday that he was quitting the company as he accused Anthropic and rival OpenAI of “gambling with our lives.” He added that those building AI believed that it could “kill us all by the end of the decade.” Evan Hubinger, Anthropic’s alignment lead, responded that he expects there is a more than 10% chance of that happening.

Since then, several employees at both AI labs have come out in support of calls to slow the pace of AI development as they stressed the risks of the technology. The public warnings are the culmination of growing concern globally about the capability of AI, following numerous cyberattacks and security incidents in recent months by rogue models developed by both OpenAI and Anthropic.

Sixth news item

Today marks the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

President George W. Bush standing at Ground Zero in New York City following the September 11 Attacks. “I can hear you.” https://t.co/fx8E680m6N

— History Calendar (@HistoryCalendar) September 9, 2026

How it’s going 25 years later:

“Before 9/11, the primary concern came from centralized international terrorist organizations. Today, those groups remain a threat, but the landscape is broader and more dispersed,” according to a DHS spokesperson. “Individuals and small cells now plot attacks independently, often motivated by a range of ideological and political goals.

Foreign terrorist organizations, such as ISIS and al-Qaeda continue to seek ways to carry out or inspire attacks in the U.S., the spokesperson said.

“At the same time, domestic terrorists continue to plan acts of violence, often driven by anti-government views and a desire to destabilize society,” the spokesperson added.

9/11 then and now: Photos show how the World Trade Center area has changed in 25 years
In the past year and a half, the FBI has arrested at least 16 people inside the U.S. homeland for allegedly plotting or supporting plots to kill Americans on behalf of al-Qaeda or ISIS, officials say.

Count your blessings and have a great weekend.

—Dana

[guest post by JVW]

This year (technically back in April) marked the fiftieth anniversary of the theatrical release of one of America’s greatest summer movies, The Bad News Bears. One half-century removed from its premier during the Bicentennial year, it still resonates as a truly great look at that troublesome nexus between kids, parents, and sports, and it provides a timeless lesson on the values of courage, friendship, and tenacity.

Hopefully most of you have seen the movie and are generally familiar with it, but here is a quick outline of the plot. Set in the San Fernando Valley, a city councilman has sued the local six-team Little League because his son and some other boys have not been skilled enough to be accepted by any of the teams. Having thus forced the league to add a seventh team, known as the Bears, the councilman hires ex-Minor League Baseball pitcher Morris Buttermaker (Walter Matthau), an alcoholic whose regular job is as a pool-cleaner at ritzy homes, to manage the ragtag squad. The boys are awful and Buttermaker barely gives a damn, until he prevails upon an ex-girlfriend’s daughter, Amanda Wurlitzer (Tatum O’Neal), whom he had taught to pitch years earlier, to join the team. Amanda is in that pre-adolescent phase where she wants to leave behind her tomboy past and become a teenage girl, but she barters with Buttermaker and cuts a deal that she will pitch for the Bears in return for Buttermaker paying for ballet lessons and designer jeans.

Amanda is a good pitcher, but the team behind her is so miserable that the team continues to lose. That changes when local juvenile delinquent, the motorcycle-riding, cigarette-smoking Kelly Leak (Jackie Earle Haley) joins the Bears to stick it to the uptight adults who run the league. Kelly turns out to be a phenomenal athlete, and his addition to the team immediately turns around the Bears’ season. As the Bears begin to move up in the league standings, Buttermaker becomes more intense as a manager, emulating the hyper-competitiveness of the league’s other teams. The Bears advance to the league championship against the league’s dominant team, the Yankees, whose coach Roy Turner (Vic Morrow) is a combination of John McGraw and Bobby Cox. The two teams play a close and spirited game, until Buttermaker suddenly realizes that he has become another Turner, squeezing the joy out of the game and making it about his ego rather than a fun time for the kids. He relents and allows all of his players to play which stakes the Yankees to a strong lead, but the Bears rally in the final inning only to come up short in the end. As the Yankees joylessly accept another championship trophy, Buttermaker reminds the kids that baseball is fun and that it shouldn’t be the focus of their youth.

The writer of the movie, Bill Lancaster, is the son of legendary actor Burt Lancaster. This unconvincing behind-the-scenes video (I don’t recommend you waste your time watching it) claims that Matthau’s character Morris Buttermaker is based upon the writer’s famous father, but I get the sense that Burt Lancaster was closer in personality to Vic Morrow’s character Roy Turner: intense, obsessive, and distant. Matthau was the third choice for the role of Buttermaker, after both Steve McQueen and Warren Beatty passed on the role. It’s hard to see either of them so convincingly playing the world-weary drunk who allows a group of sixth graders to affect his worldview. Matthau’s son Charlie said that his dad, who could be grumpy on set, came to adore the young actors who made up the Bears, and always named this movie as one of his favorite roles.

Tatum O’Neal, like Matthau, was an Academy Award winner when cast in the movie, having won at the remarkably precocious age of ten. She filmed her role as Amanda a few months before her twelfth birthday and apparently learned enough about pitching to be a passable Little Leaguer. Vic Morrow is excellent as the enemy manager, Turner, mixing an old-school drill sergeant mentality with more than a hint of malevolence. Jackie Earle Haley, fourteen at the time of filming, allegedly rode a small motorcycle to his audition (obviously without a license) which all but guaranteed that he would be cast as the miscreant Kelly Leak.

But the heart of the movie isn’t either one of the Oscar winners; it isn’t Morrow, the old pro, father to Jennifer Jason Leigh; it isn’t even Haley who perhaps had the meatiest role of all. The character who leaves the most indelible mark on the viewer (or at least to this one) is the second baseman Tanner Boyle, played by Chris Barnes. Tanner is short and not particularly athletic, but has a hair-trigger temper and is prone to profane and racist outbursts against his teammates, coaches, and opponents. He comes across at first as unlikeable, a little twerp with a Napoleonic complex, but as he plot unfolds he emerges as the most consistently reliable teammate and friend.

My favorite scene is when the team decides to quit en masse, handing their jerseys back to Buttermaker in the dugout a day after an early humiliating loss. Team spokesman Toby Whitewood (David Stambaugh) tells Buttermaker the decision is unanimous. As the coach scans his players in the dugout, he lands upon Tanner, whose face is bruised and nursing a cut lip, having fought “the entire seventh grade” who had picked on Bears players. Buttermaker asks Tanner if he too wants to quit. Tanner’s response is to stare Buttermaker defiantly in the eyes, and reply “Crud no. I want to play ball.” Later on, Tanner intervenes when players from the Yankees begin bullying the Bears seldom-used outfielder Timmy Lupus, having only just moments ago demanded Timmy not sit near him, and fights two larger boys in defense of Timmy and, by extension, the Bears. In the championship game when a Yankee player sides foot up while charging home on a wild pitch and kicks Amanda square in the chest, it’s none other than Tanner who accosts the boy and kicks him squarely in the nuts. As Buttermaker begins tyrannically coaching, it’s Tanner whose plaintive and incredulous gaze snaps the coach back to reality.

But it’s in the final scene where the legend of the movie, and that of Tanner Boyle, is secured. After the Bears come up short on the final out of the game, Buttermaker, seeking redemption from this players, begins handing them celebratory beers (there’s no way this scene would be included today, and indeed, in the 2005 remake the kids are given non-alcoholic beers) and congratulating them on their efforts. As the Bears file back on to the field, beers in hand, to watch the Yankees accept the championship trophy, the Yankees captain delivers a half-hearted and smarmy apology. The captain of the Bears (because I just retroactively appointed him that), Tanner Boyle, responds with one of the great lines in cinematic history.

Everything about this movie is great, from the writing, the casting, the performances, the direction, the use of Bizet’s Carmen as the score. Fifty years later it remains one of the greatest summer movies ever, and is a fine way to bid adieu to summer and move into autumn.

– JVW

[guest post by Dana]

Midterm bribe:

President Donald Trump on Wednesday night promised every adult American citizen a $5,000 “dividend” if the Republicans are victorious in the upcoming midterm elections.
. . .

“Here is my promise: if the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them… because of our tremendous strength and success economically, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000,” he told a crowd at the GOP’s midterm convention in Dallas.

This isn’t the first time Trump has promised dividends to the American people:

First, at the start of his second term, President Trump promised a DOGE dividend, a pledge to take the money that Elon Musk’s team would cut from the federal budget and send it to the American people.

Then Mr. Trump moved on to a “tariff refund,” a plan to use the money the government was collecting in import taxes to fund payments for the public.

But in each case, no money was ever received by the appointed recipients. They were just more grifts.

It is estimated that if this latest promise of $5,000 per adult were fulfilled, it would cost north of $1 trillion.

Brett Baier of Fox News asked Vice-President J.D. Vance whether the payment proposal was a bribe:

“I can hear the critics’ heads exploding. They’re saying out loud, I guarantee you, ‘the president is bribing voters to vote for Republicans to take over the House, and then he’s bankrupting the country because the deficit and debt is huge and inflation would come back if this comes into play.’ So how do you answer those criticisms?” Baier asked.

“Well, I say first of all, what the president’s talking about is fundamentally a dividend for American workers,” Vance replied.

He continued: “We’re taking in an extraordinary amount of revenue because the president of the United States is actually standing up to both foreign companies, but also foreign countries who’ve been taking advantage of America’s workers for pretty much my entire life.”

. . .

“What the president’s just saying is, ‘If you keep it going to the American people, if you keep us in power and allow us to continue to do these things, then you’re going to share in some of the benefit of this incredible wealth that, that we’re, we’re creating in the United States of America.’ I don’t think it’s a controversial idea,” Vance added.

One thing Vance didn’t address was the likelihood of a legal challenge to the payout plan:

Under U.S. federal law*, offering or making a payment to induce someone to vote, withhold their vote, or vote for or against a candidate is a criminal offense, punishable by a fine, up to one year in prison, or both. A willful violation can carry up to two years’ imprisonment.

*Here:

Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and

Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

—Dana

[guest post by Dana]

It’s nearly impossible to not see this as the deliberate targeting of President Zelensky:

The plane carrying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to Oslo for the funeral of ​the King of Norway was nearly struck by a drone ‌when taking off from Moldova on Tuesday, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre told public broadcaster NRK on Wednesday.

“His plane was almost hit by a drone as it ​was about to take off from Moldova. That is the ​reality he is facing,” said Støre, who did not say ⁠what his source was for the information or how close the drone ​came.

The spokesperson said the president’s aircraft was later cleared for take-off once it had been established that a Russian drone had come down on Moldovan territory.

Shockingly, yet not shockingly, Trump, when asked today about a deal between Russia and Ukraine, attempted to convince people that both nations share a mutual hatred toward the other. The problem is, he ridiculously views them as equivalent. Because he has no functioning moral compass, he sees no difference between Putin and Zelensky’s position, thus no difference between Ukraine and Russia and their goals:

Trump: “Putin is wanting to make a deal, and if Zelenskyy is wanting to make a deal, that’d be very nice. The hold-up is two people that hate each other.”

Yes, they both want a deal, but not the same kind: Putin demands Ukraine’s total surrender, while Zelensky seeks a lasting,… pic.twitter.com/LwRFqcFx5e

— Kate from Kharkiv (@BohuslavskaKate) September 9, 2026

Trump: “Putin is wanting to make a deal, and if Zelenskyy is wanting to make a deal, that’d be very nice. The hold-up is two people that hate each other.”

Yes, they both want a deal, but not the same kind: Putin demands Ukraine’s total surrender, while Zelensky seeks a lasting, just peace backed by strong security guarantees to protect our independence.

The claim that they simply “hate each other” is a manipulative narrative that intentionally blurs the difference between aggressor and victim.

We might hate Russia because they are actively killing us right now. Meanwhile, Russians, and Putin in particular, hate Ukrainians simply for existing, and hate us strongly enough to invade and kill us.

Reminder: If Ukraine surrenders, quite simply, it will cease to exist.

—Dana

[guest post by Dana]

I’m sure he’s got a bridge to sell you too:

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the Iran war will end and gas prices will plummet “immediately after” the midterm elections, the latest deadline slip in a war that has lasted months longer than the president initially promised.

Trump said Iranian leadership is escalating the conflict now in order to hurt Republicans in November’s midterm elections.

“I think the war is going to end immediately after the election,” he said, speaking to reporters on the tarmac as he made his way to Texas for the Republican midterm convention. “They can’t hold out any longer. They’re desperate to try and affect the election so that we can get a nice, weak group of people in there and leave them alone and let them have their nuclear weapons.”

Why should anyone believe him when he makes these declarations? What has he done or said, since being on the public stage, that would compel anyone to believe him?

Of course the timing of the president’s assurances isn’t suspect at all:

Diesel fuel, which is now almost $6 a gallon on average, hit a record high last week and regular gasoline now averages $4.22 per gallon, up from $4.01 one month ago, according to AAA. Energy costs have driven up the price of everyday items such as groceries and are driving inflationary concerns and voter anger. Trump also claimed that gas would drop below $2 a gallon after the midterms.

—Dana

[guest post by Dana]

Let’s go!

First news item

Honoring her father and homeland:

LSU women’s basketball player Kate Koval is explaining her decision to leave the team, after the premiere college basketball program said it was signing a Russian player to its roster.

“After much reflection, I have made the difficult decision to step away from the LSU Women’s Basketball program and withdraw from LSU,” she wrote in the post.

“My father serves in the Ukrainian military and takes tremendous pride in defending his country against Russian aggression,” Koval wrote in her post Wednesday. “For me, this war is not distant or abstract. People close to me have been killed and wounded in Russian attacks, and places where I grew up and first began playing basketball have been destroyed by missile strikes.”

Koval said the university’s decision to sign the player made her reconsider her decision to stay with LSU.

“The timing of this situation and the deeply personal effect it has had on me, my family, and those we care about who continue to live through and fight this war ultimately made me question whether LSU remained the right place for me,” she wrote.

Second news item

Here we go again:

Excavation work for the construction of President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot “triumphal arch” will begin over the next two weeks, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced.

“We are pleased to announce that after a very long wait (over 125 years!), we are preparing to start, over the next two-week period, the excavation work necessary for the Great Triumphal Arch and Military Observation Deck, at Memorial Circle on Columbia Island between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery,” Burgum wrote in a social media post on Thursday.

I see a pattern: Big plans from the White House lead to big chaos (the ballroom to replace the East Wing, the fountain between the National Mall and the White House).

FYI: There has been no approval given for this latest project. . .

Third news item

This :

The Missouri Supreme Court has unanimously blocked the state from moving forward with a new House map that favors Republicans in this year’s midterm elections, ordering a statewide vote on whether to uphold or reject the new map.

The decision Thursday marks a rare setback for Republicans in the national redistricting battle, as they fight to hold onto their slim House majority. It’s also a massive win for longtime Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, whose Kansas City-area district was set to be redrawn to tilt it toward the GOP.

And that:

In a win for voters, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled that a constitutional amendment on redistricting proposed by state Democrats can appear on the ballot in November.

Should voters approve the measure, it would clear the way for Maryland Democrats to redraw the state’s congressional districts for the 2028 election to counteract a wave of gerrymanders Republican-led states carried out over the past year at the behest of President Donald Trump.

Fourth news item

Where’s Mitch?:

House Oversight Chair James Comer of Kentucky said Thursday that Sen. Mitch McConnell’s staff have told him they are hoping the senator – who has had an extended absence from Washington due to health issues – will return when the Senate comes back into session on September 14.

Fifth news item

He’d rather it was a (re-introduced) $1,000 bill but will have to settle for a $1 coin:

The U.S. Mint began selling $1 Trump coins Wednesday.

Why it matters: The Trump coin sits in a rare middle ground: The Mint is promoting it as a collectible, but under federal law, it has a face value of $1 and can be used as real money.

. . .

The big picture: Trump’s coin has raised legal questions over whether a sitting president can appear on U.S. money.

“Legal tender” refers to U.S. money that can pay debts, taxes, dues and public charges, according to federal law.

The U.S. Mint deems the $1 Trump coin legal tender with a face value of $1, regardless of what a collector pays for it.

Yes, but: Legal tender doesn’t guarantee every store will accept Trump coins. Federal law generally lets private businesses decide what forms of payment they’ll accept.

Have a great weekend.

—Dana

[guest post by Dana]

Surprising:

Fox News is parting ways with longtime business news anchor Maria Bartiromo, effective immediately.

Fox announced the departure Thursday afternoon, noting that the morning’s episode of “Mornings with Maria” on Fox Business was her last.

“We thank Maria for her work over the last 12 ½ years and wish her all the best on her next chapter,” Fox said in a statement.

As of this time, Bartiromo has not made a public statement about her departure.

—Dana

[guest post by Dana]

Trump at work:

Now that we have it under U.S.A. control, should we change the name Hormuz Strait to TRUMP STRAIT??? Like America itself, it would be “hotter” than ever before! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP.

I’m torn. On one hand, this is just more dumb, childish vanity nonsense from Trump. The name change is being considered as an exercise in power, and payback. And, as always, it’s a distraction. Shouldn’t the President of the United States be occupied with more important concerns?

Yet, on the other hand, the more time he spends on the dumb stuff, the less time he has to do actual serious damage to the United States’ economy, image, relationship with ally nations, and world events.

It’s a bit of a conundrum.

—Dana

[guest post by Dana]

So, how are Trump’s plans going for next week’s midterm convention in Dallas? Not as well as he had hoped, it seems. There is rebellion in the ranks as some Republicans, expected to attend, are instead put off by the required $25,000 (minimum) entry donation, and the event itself:

President Donald Trump has a vision for next week’s GOP convention in Dallas: a televised spectacle putting Republican candidates in front of midterm voters and top party donors just two months before the Election Day — with Trump himself headlining the show.

But a POLITICO survey of more than 70 GOP candidates and members revealed that most either do not plan to attend or are still weighing whether to go. Dozens more declined to share their plans.

The 45 Republicans cited a variety of reasons for skipping the first midterm convention put on by a major party in more than four decades. Some cited prior obligations such as fundraisers or events in their districts that were planned before the convention was scheduled in June. Others had personal conflicts, like weddings and family events, and still others raised qualms about the five-figure-minimum fees that party officials want attending lawmakers to pony up.

Another reason for skipping the circus convention is that some candidates’ want to avoid appearing close to such a “polarizing” and deeply unpopular president.

At least one Republican non-attendee pointed out the obvious:

“You shouldn’t be having to rally your base at this point,” the member said. “You should be trying to convince independents. Independents are not attending nor watching the midterm convention.”

Anyway, it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.

—Dana