Abstract
In the constitutional debate that has been encouraged by Public Choice theory, there has been repeated referenses to Knut Wicksell. The purpose of this article is to place the contribution of Wicksell on just taxation in a historical context. At the same time it is pointed at other contributions to the Scandinavian debate, in particular it is introduced the contribution of the Norwegian economist, Einar Einarson, that was written prior to Wicksell's celebrated treatise. Some recent research into the historical experience, referred to both by Einarson and Wicksell, of political decision making by consent is also presented.
Firstly an overview of the debate is presented, then the contribution of Einarson and Wicksell is compared, and finally the implications of this Scandinavian controversy about just taxation on Public Choice theory is discussed. It is asked whether some recent interpretations of the constitutional content of Wicksell and the Scandinavian controversy about just taxation, are correct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amundsen, Kåre (1963).Norsk Sosialøkonomi 1814–1890. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Atkinson A.B. and Stiglitz J.E. (1980).Lectures on Public Economics. London: McGraw Hill.
Bergh, T. and Hanisch, T. (1984).Vitenskap og politikk. Oslo: Aschehoug.
Buchanan, J. and Tullock, G. (1965).The Calculus of Consent. Michigan: Ann Arbor Paperbacks.
Buchanan, James (1977).Freedom in Constitutional Contract. Texas: A & M University Press.
Einarsen, E. (1895). Skat eller konfiskation?Statsøkonomisk Tidsskrift, Oslo, translated and published in English by Agder Research Institute, Serial, Kristiansand, Norway.
Elster, J. (1988). Consequences of constitutional choice: reflections on Tocqueville. In J. Elster and R. Slagstad (Eds.),Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gwartney, J.D., Wagner, R.E. (Eds.) (1988).Public Choice and Constitutional Economics. Connecticut: Jai Press.
Hodne, Fritz (1984).Stortinget som markedsplass. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Holmes, S. (1988). Gag rules and the politics of omission. In J. Elster and R. Slagstad (Eds.),Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johansen, Leif (1963). Some notes on the Lindahl Theory of Determination of Public Expenditures.International Economic Review. Reprinted in L. Johansen:Offentlig Økonomikk, Oslo, 1965.
Jæger, Oscar (1930).Finanslære. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Lindahl, Erik (1919).Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteuerung, Lund. In R. Musgrave and A. Peacock (Eds.),Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: Macmillan.
Morgenstierne (1901). Bredo Om principerne for en retfærdig skattefordeling.Statsøkonomisk Tidsskrift, Oslo.
Mueller, Dennis (1989).Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Musgrave, R. and Peacock, A. (1958).Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: Macmillan.
Robbins, Lionel (1932).An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: The Macmillan Press, 1984.
Seiersted, F. (1988). From liberal constitutionalism to corporate pluralism. In J. Elster and R. Slagstad (Eds.),Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slagstad, Rune (1987).Rett og Politikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Wieser, Friedrich von (1914).Social Economics. New York: Augustus Kelly, 1967.
Wicksell, Knut (1896).Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, Jena. In R. Musgrave and A. Peacock (Eds.),Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnsen, G. The impact of the Scandinavian controversy about just taxation on public choice; a late homage to Einar Einarson. Public Choice 81, 323–338 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053236
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053236
