Repository navigation
Remove stream entry model - #11247
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Gargron
force-pushed
the
fix-remove-stream-entry
branch
from
July 6, 2019 23:34
af0b5ca to
f0852fc
Compare
GET /:username/updates/:id
Gargron
force-pushed
the
fix-remove-stream-entry
branch
3 times, most recently
from
July 7, 2019 00:43
bb5d89f to
d45ebb0
Compare
Gargron
force-pushed
the
fix-remove-stream-entry
branch
from
July 7, 2019 02:19
d45ebb0 to
312d119
Compare
ykzts
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2019
hiyuki2578
pushed a commit
to ProjectMyosotis/mastodon
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2019
messenjahofchrist
pushed a commit
to Origin-Creative/mastodon
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2021
2 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
GET /:username/updates/:idStreamEntrymodel andstream_entriestableThis PR is centered around the removal of the
StreamEntrymodel. That model serves no purpose outside OStatus. While it would be nice to keep Atom feeds since Atom is technically a more proper feed reader format than RSS, the Atom feed code is too heavily reliant onStreamEntryand OStatus-specific extensions. Removing the Atom feeds gives us the benefit of only having one code path where content can be fetched by other servers.