Skip to content

syscall: misleading documentation for linux SysProcAttr.Pdeathsig #27505

Closed

Description

@virtuald

Currently, the documentation says:

// Signal that the process will get when its parent dies (Linux only)

However, according to the prctl man page:

Warning: the "parent" in this case is considered to be the thread that created this process. In other words, the signal will be sent when that thread terminates (via, for example, pthread_exit(3)), rather than after all of the threads in the parent process terminate.

I got bit by this in a python program -- started a new program on one thread, and tried to wait for it on another thread, and the child process kept dying and it took awhile to figure out what was going on. While I haven't ran into it in go yet, because in go threads and goroutines aren't one to one, I imagine if one ran into this sort of bug it would only occur intermittently.

Thinking about it, it seems like a user might want to call runtime.LockOSThread when using this?

It's not clear to me whether the docs should have a larger warning in them -- but I think at the minimum the documentation should be updated to say 'parent thread' or 'parent goroutine' instead of just 'parent'.

Activity

  1. dominikh commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @dominikh
    Member

    If I am not mistaken, the current implementation of Go never kills threads, which is why you wouldn't be able to run into this bug in Go currently. At the same time, if Go ever does start killing threads, this might hit a lot of people at once.

  2. virtuald commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @virtuald
    Author

    Looked around a bit, looks like go 1.10+ will kill a thread if you lock it and the goroutine exits without unlocking it: #20395

    Here's an example that shows that:

    package main
    
    import (
    	"flag"
    	"fmt"
    	"os/exec"
    	"runtime"
    	"syscall"
    )
    
    func main() {
    	kill := false
    	flag.BoolVar(&kill, "death", false, "Set deathsig")
    	flag.Parse()
    
    	cmd := exec.Command("sleep", "1000")
    	if kill == true {
    		fmt.Println("Death is coming")
    		cmd.SysProcAttr = &syscall.SysProcAttr{
    			Setpgid:   true,
    			Pdeathsig: syscall.SIGKILL,
    		}
    	}
    
    	// force other goroutines to be spawned on a new thread
    	runtime.LockOSThread()
    
    	done := make(chan struct{})
    
    	go func() {
    		runtime.LockOSThread()
    		err := cmd.Start()
    		if err != nil {
    			fmt.Println(err)
    		}
    		close(done)
    		fmt.Println("Exit goroutine")
    	}()
    
    	<-done
    
    	fmt.Println("Waiting")
    	err := cmd.Wait()
    	fmt.Println("Done", err)
    }

    In that example, if -death is passed as an argument the program will immediately exit. Obviously, you have to go out of your way to trigger this behavior, but presumably someone who is messing with platform-specific behavior is going to want to know about platform-specific behaviors... thus why the docs should at least hint that this is possible.

  3. added
    NeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
    on Sep 6, 2018
  4. changed the title [-]Update documentation for linux SysProcAttr.Pdeathsig[/-] [+]syscall: misleading documentation for linux SysProcAttr.Pdeathsig[/+] on Sep 6, 2018
  5. virtuald commented on Oct 21, 2020

    @virtuald
    Author

    Circling back to this, I did eventually figure out the right way to use Pdeathsig, and I think the documentation should include some examples or discussion about this.

    Here's an example of what people usually want to do when using Pdeathsig -- ensure the child dies when the parent dies. This example ensures that golang won't accidentally kill the OS thread associated with the child process.

    package main
    
    import (
    	"fmt"
    	"os/exec"
    	"runtime"
    	"syscall"
    )
    
    func main() {
    
    	done := make(chan struct{})
    
    	cmd := exec.Command("sleep", "1000")
    	cmd.SysProcAttr = &syscall.SysProcAttr{
    		Setpgid:   true,
    		Pdeathsig: syscall.SIGKILL,
    	}
    
    	go func() {
    		// On Linux, pdeathsig will kill the child process when the thread dies,
    		// not when the process dies. runtime.LockOSThread ensures that as long
    		// as this function is executing that OS thread will still be around
    		runtime.LockOSThread()
    		defer runtime.UnlockOSThread()
    
    		err := cmd.Start()
    		if err != nil {
    			fmt.Println(err)
    		}
    
    		fmt.Println("Child is PID", cmd.Process.Pid)
    		err = cmd.Wait()
    		close(done)
    		fmt.Println("Child exited:", err)
    	}()
    
    	fmt.Println("Waiting for child to exit")
    	<-done
    	fmt.Println("Parent exiting")
    }
  6. added this to the Backlog milestone on Oct 21, 2020
  7. gopherbot commented on Jun 14, 2022

    @gopherbot
    Contributor

    Change https://go.dev/cl/412114 mentions this issue: syscall: clarify Pdeathsig documentation on Linux

  8. cespare commented on Jun 14, 2022

    @cespare
    Contributor

    @ianlancetaylor On the CL you wrote

    and it's not clear to me why the workaround works in the general case

    (The workaround being to use LockOSThread in the goroutine that creates the child process to ensure that that thread can't be killed.)

    Can you say more about why it might not work?

  9. ianlancetaylor commented on Jun 14, 2022

    @ianlancetaylor
    Contributor

    The CL says " A workaround is to call LockOSThread just before starting the new process and UnlockOSThread after it finishes." But the thread can then later, before the child process exits, pick up another goroutine, that goroutine can call LockOSThread, and then that goroutine can exit. That will cause the thread to exit, and cause a signal to be sent to the child process, although the parent process overall is still running. Unless I misunderstand something.

  10. cespare commented on Jun 15, 2022

    @cespare
    Contributor

    But the thread can then later, before the child process exits, pick up another goroutine,

    Isn't the point of LockOSThread that this cannot happen?

  11. Tasssadar commented on Jun 15, 2022

    @Tasssadar
    Contributor

    The idea is that the goroutine locks to thread, and then just waits and does nothing until the process exits. That way, the thread cannot exit until the exec'd process exits

    go func() {
    	runtime.LockOSThread()
    
    	err := cmd.Start()
    	if err != nil {
    		...
    	}
    
    	// some channels to communicate with this goroutine or whatever are here...
            // <-finished
    
    
    	err = cmd.Wait()
    
    	runtime.UnlockOSThread()
    }()
  12. ianlancetaylor commented on Jun 15, 2022

    @ianlancetaylor
    Contributor

    Thanks, I understand the comment now. I was reading "after it finishes" as meaning "after StartProcess completes," but it really means "after Wait completes.`"

  13. 25 remaining items

  14. andrewhodel commented on Aug 12, 2026

    @andrewhodel

    You might want to include does not work with darwin in the title.

    The title of this issue explicitly says "linux", and Pdeathsig is defined in exec_linux.go. That seems clear enough?

    You are omitting that Pdeathsig is defined for FreeBSD and OpenBSD.

    I think there can be another issue but it is a very simple fix to document and add a Pdeathsig parameter that has no affect to the darwin specification considering that updating the documentation is going to require updating it for many other OS.

    FreeBSD supports parent-death signal functionality natively via the procctl() system call using PROC_PDEATHSIG_CTL. This mirrors Linux's prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG) feature, ensuring a designated signal is delivered to a child process if its parent process terminates. It is supported in standard programming languages like Go (via SysProcAttr.Pdeathsig.
    

    You can also read #46258 and discover that FreeBSD support was already proposed, accepted and completed: 2feb2cc meaning that the documentation saying linux only needs to be fixed and consider this.

  15. virtuald commented on Aug 12, 2026

    @virtuald
    Author

    You are omitting that Pdeathsig is defined for FreeBSD and OpenBSD.

    This issue is about misleading documentation for Pdeathsig for Linux. If the documentation for FreeBSD/OpenBSD is also misleading, it seems better to open a different issue to keep this one focused on what it was originally intended to be about.

    In any case, I think the Linux documentation is sufficient now, so this issue could probably be closed.

  16. andrewhodel commented on Aug 12, 2026

    @andrewhodel

    You are omitting that Pdeathsig is defined for FreeBSD and OpenBSD.

    This issue is about misleading documentation for Pdeathsig for Linux. If the documentation for FreeBSD/OpenBSD is also misleading, it seems better to open a different issue to keep this one focused on what it was originally intended to be about.

    In any case, I think the Linux documentation is sufficient now, so this issue could probably be closed.

    I haven't seen any job postings of Issue manager meaning that what you are saying has an invalid premise without proper employment.

    I agree that it should be a case by case basis, but unfortunately honesty isn't respected when there's a period of learning (GPU) and many people use pattern matching during those times to manipulate the lazy in order that their profit is consolidated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    DocumentationIssues describing a change to documentation.NeedsInvestigationSomeone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.compiler/runtimeIssues related to the Go compiler and/or runtime.help wanted

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions