2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.12.002
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Evolution of the Age at Menarche from Prehistorical to Modern Times

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
109
20
15
1

Citation Types

8
52
0
4

Year Published

Range
2017
2017
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
104
14
13
7

Relationship

1
137

Authors

Journals

Cited by 138 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 34 publications

8
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our results show an overall decline in mean AAM for Mexican women of 0.77 years (9.2 months) for the period 1930 to 1980 (0.15 years. per decade), in line with widely documented shifts in maturation age over the last century in response to improved living standards worldwide (Papadimitriou, 2016; Parent et al, 2003). In agreement with prior independent studies that documented younger menarcheal ages among urban (Dickinson, Castillo, Vales, & Uc, 1995; Knaul, 2001; Peña‐Gómez, 1970), nonindigenous (Wolanski et al, 1993), better nourished (Díaz de Mathman, Landa‐Rico, & Ramos‐Galván, 1968), better educated (Knaul, 2001) and higher SES Mexican women (Jacobo & Malacara, 1985; Méndez‐Estrada, Valencia, & Meléndez‐Torres, 2006), our findings highlight differences in maturation age between indigenous and nonindigenous populations (Figure 2), rural and urban dwellers (Figure 2) and socioeconomic groups (Figure 3) throughout the period of study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Our results show an overall decline in mean AAM for Mexican women of 0.77 years (9.2 months) for the period 1930 to 1980 (0.15 years. per decade), in line with widely documented shifts in maturation age over the last century in response to improved living standards worldwide (Papadimitriou, 2016;Parent et al, 2003). In agreement (1940-1980s) by socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Secular Trends
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation