AI, talent acquisition, and what comes after the resume pile.

I’m Jeff Midland. I’m a Bay Area native, and I spent 17 years building and managing talent programs for Meta, Google, and other major tech companies as a primary staffing partner. I ran the recruiters, the strategy, and the spend, and generated over $100M in revenue over my career.

Then I pivoted and started building companies of my own. That meant hiring my own people and designing my own systems from scratch, with no enterprise budget and no team to inherit. It’s also where the AI question stopped being theoretical for me.

Talent acquisition pulled me back in. The timing was too interesting to sit out. This is the biggest opening the function has had in twenty years, and most companies are going to miss it.

Most hiring processes are the result of twenty years of small decisions nobody revisited. A req form from 2011, an approval chain nobody remembers building, four interview rounds because that’s how many the last VP liked. It worked well enough that nobody had a reason to tear it down.

AI just gave everyone a reason. For the first time in decades, the cost of rethinking how a company hires is lower than the cost of leaving it alone. Automation handles what used to justify the headcount. The constraints that made the old process necessary are gone.

That’s an opening, and it won’t stay open. Some companies are using it to rebuild hiring around what actually predicts success. Others will spend the next three years bolting AI onto a process from 2011 and wondering why nothing improved. The gap between those two groups is going to get very obvious, very fast.

Sourcing got cheaper. Screening got faster. Scheduling mostly runs itself now. That’s a real win, and the teams moving fastest are the ones treating it that way.

The hard part was always judgment. Knowing which candidate actually works out. Building a process you can trust when volume goes up. Deciding which of the fifty tools in your inbox is worth a security review and a line in next year’s budget.

That’s where the interesting work is happening. Proof of skill instead of resume screens. Structured evaluation replacing gut calls. Community and social signal layered into sourcing. Some of it works. Some of it doesn’t yet. We talk to the people finding out.

What We Actually Cover

Every week the show gets at four things.

This is a working conversation among the people rebuilding hiring. Heads of talent acquisition carrying more volume, more scrutiny, and the same headcount. Agency and staffing firm owners who can see the model changing under them. HR and people leaders who own the function and the budget behind it. HR tech founders building the thing everyone else is evaluating. If you’ve inherited a hiring function you’d never design from scratch, you’re in the right place.

Want This Applied to Your Function, Not Just Discussed?