Classified information explained

Classified information is confidential material that a government, corporation, or non-governmental organisation deems to be sensitive information, which must be protected from unauthorized disclosure and that requires special handling and dissemination controls. Access is restricted by law, regulation, or corporate policies to particular groups of individuals with both the necessary security clearance and a need to know.

Classified information within an organisation is typically arranged into several hierarchical levels of sensitivity—e.g. Confidential (C), Secret (S), and Top Secret (TS). The choice of which level to assign a file is based on threat modelling, with different organisations have varying classification systems, asset management rules, and assessment frameworks. Classified information generally becomes less sensitive with the passage of time, and may eventually be reclassified or declassified and made public.

Governments often require a formal security clearance and corresponding background check to view or handle classified material. Mishandling or unlawful disclosure of confidential material can incur criminal penalties, depending on the nature of the information and the laws of a jurisdiction. Since the late twentieth century, there has been freedom of information legislation in some countries, where the public is deemed to have the right to all information that is not considered to be damaging if released. Sometimes documents are released with information still considered confidential redacted. Classified information is sometimes also intentionally leaked to the media to influence public opinion.[1] [2]

Governmental classification levels

Top Secret (TS)

In many jurisdictions, for example, the United States and United Kingdom, Top Secret (TS) is the highest level of classified information.[3] Prior to 1942, the United Kingdom and other members of the British Empire used Most Secret, but this was later changed to match the United States' category name of Top Secret in order to simplify Allied interoperability. The unauthorized disclosure of Top Secret information is expected to cause harm and be of grave threat to national security.[4] [5]

Secret

Secret material is often regarded as causative of "serious damage" to national security if it were publicly available,[6] although not as serious harm as in the case of Top Secret classification.

Confidential

Confidential material is material that would cause "damage" or be prejudicial to national security if publicly available. It is used in the US since as early as 1936.[7] A relatively recent revision of its definition is in Executive Order 13526.

Restricted

Restricted material would cause "undesirable effects" if publicly available. Some countries do not have such a classification in public sectors, such as commercial industries. Such a level is also known as "Private Information". Such a level existed within the US Government during World War II but is no longer used.[8]

The Official-Sensitive classification replaced the Restricted classification in April 2014 in the UK. Unlike information only marked Official, information that belong to this class is of some interest to threat actors. Compromise is likely to cause moderate damage to the work or reputation of the organisation and/or the government.

Controlled

This class of information forms the generality of government business, public service delivery and commercial activity. Compared to the higher levels, the consequence of compromise is lower but not nonexistent.

Unclassified

Unclassified information is low-impact, and therefore does not require any special protection.

Corporate classification

Private corporations often require written confidentiality agreements and conduct background checks on candidates for sensitive positions.[10]

Policies dictating methods for marking and safeguarding company-sensitive information are common in companies, especially as regards information that is protected under trade secret laws. New product development teams are often sequestered and forbidden to share information about their efforts with un-cleared employees. Other activities, such as mergers and financial report preparation generally involve similar restrictions. However, corporate security generally lacks the standardised hierarchical clearance and sensitivity structures and the criminal sanctions of government classification systems.

In the U.S., the Employee Polygraph Protection Act prohibits private employers from requiring lie detector tests, but there are a few exceptions.

Trade secrets

See main article: Trade secret.

Personally identifiable information (PII)

See main article: Personal data.

Nonpublic personal information

Material Nonpublic Information

See main article: Material non-public information.

International classification systems

When a government agency or group shares information between an agency or group of other country's government they will generally employ a special classification scheme that both parties have previously agreed to honour.

For example, the marking Atomal, is applied to U.S. Restricted Data or Formerly Restricted Data and United Kingdom Atomic information that has been released to NATO. Atomal information is marked COSMIC Top Secret Atomal (CTSA), NATO Secret Atomal (NSAT), or NATO Confidential Atomal (NCA). BALK and BOHEMIA are also used.

NATO classifications

For example, sensitive information shared amongst NATO allies has four levels of security classification; from most to least classified:[11] [12]

  1. COSMIC Top Secret (CTS)
  2. NATO Secret (NS)
  3. NATO Confidential (NC)
  4. NATO Restricted (NR)

A special case exists with regard to NATO Unclassified (NU) information. Documents with this marking are NATO property (copyright) and must not be made public without NATO permission.

COSMIC is an acronym for "Control of Secret Material in an International Command".[14]

International organizations

Traffic Light Protocol

The Traffic Light Protocol[19] [20] was developed by the Group of Eight countries to enable the sharing of sensitive information between government agencies and corporations. This protocol has now been accepted as a model for trusted information exchange by over 30 other countries. The protocol provides for four "information sharing levels" for the handling of sensitive information.

By country

Most countries employ some sort of classification system for certain government information. For example, in Canada, information that the U.S. would classify SBU (Sensitive but Unclassified) is called "protected" and further subcategorised into levels A, B, and C.

Australia

On 19 July 2011, the National Security (NS) classification marking scheme and the Non-National Security (NNS) classification marking scheme in Australia was unified into one structure.

As of 2018, the policy detailing how Australian government entities handle classified information is defined in the Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF). The PSPF is published by the Attorney-General's Department and covers security governance, information security, personal security, and physical security. A security classification can be applied to the information itself or an asset that holds information e.g., a USB or laptop.[21]

The Australian Government uses four security classifications: OFFICIAL: Sensitive, PROTECTED, SECRET and TOP SECRET. The relevant security classification is based on the likely damage resulting from compromise of the information's confidentiality.

All other information from business operations and services requires a routine level of protection and is treated as OFFICIAL. Information that does not form part of official duty is treated as UNOFFICIAL.

OFFICIAL and UNOFFICIAL are not security classifications and are not mandatory markings.

Caveats are a warning that the information has special protections in addition to those indicated by the security classification of PROTECTED or higher (or in the case of the NATIONAL CABINET caveat, OFFICIAL: Sensitive or higher). Australia has four caveats:

Codewords are primarily used within the national security community. Each codeword identifies a special need-to-know compartment.

Foreign government markings are applied to information created by Australian agencies from foreign source information. Foreign government marking caveats require protection at least equivalent to that required by the foreign government providing the source information.

Special handling instructions are used to indicate particular precautions for information handling. They include:

A releasability caveat restricts information based on citizenship. The three in use are:

Additionally, the PSPF outlines Information Management Markers (IMM) as a way for entities to identify information that is subject to non-security related restrictions on access and use. These are:

Brazil

There are three levels of document classification under Brazilian Law No. 12.527, the Access to Information Act:[22] Portuguese: ultrassecreto (top secret), Portuguese: secreto (secret) and Portuguese: reservado (restricted).

A top secret (Portuguese: ultrassecreto) government-issued document may be classified for a period of 25 years, which may be extended up to another 25 years.[23] Thus, no document remains classified for more than 50 years. This is mandated by the 2011 Information Access Law (Portuguese: Lei de Acesso à Informação), a change from the previous rule, under which documents could have their classification time length renewed indefinitely, effectively shuttering state secrets from the public. The 2011 law applies retroactively to existing documents.

Canada

Background and hierarchy

The government of Canada employs two main types of sensitive information designation: Classified and Protected. The access and protection of both types of information is governed by the Security of Information Act, effective 24 December 2001, replacing the Official Secrets Act 1981.[24] To access the information, a person must have the appropriate security clearance and the need to know.

In addition, the caveat "Canadian Eyes Only" is used to restrict access to Classified or Protected information only to Canadian citizens with the appropriate security clearance and need to know.[25]

Special operational information

SOI is not a classification of data per se. It is defined under the Security of Information Act, and unauthorised release of such information constitutes a higher breach of trust, with a penalty of up to life imprisonment if the information is shared with a foreign entity or terrorist group.

SOIs include:

In February 2025, the Department of National Defence announced a new category of Persons Permanently Bound to Security (PPBS). The protection would apply to some units, sections or elements, and select positions (both current and former), with access to sensitive Special Operational Information (SOI) for national defense and intelligence work. If a unit or organization routinely handles SOI, all members of that unit will be automatically bound to secrecy. If an individual has direct access to SOI, deemed to be integral to national security, that person may be recommended for PPBS designation. The designation is for life, punishable by imprisonment.[26]

Classified information

Classified information can be designated Top Secret, Secret or Confidential. These classifications are only used on matters of national interest.

Protected information

Protected information is not classified. It pertains to any sensitive information that does not relate to national security and cannot be disclosed under the access and privacy legislation because of the potential injury to particular public or private interests.[27] [28]

Federal Cabinet (King's Privy Council for Canada) papers are either protected (e.g., overhead slides prepared to make presentations to Cabinet) or classified (e.g., draft legislation, certain memos).[29]

People's Republic of China

See main article: Classified information in China. The Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China (which is not operative in the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau) makes it a crime to release a state secret. Regulation and enforcement is carried out by the National Administration for the Protection of State Secrets.

Under the 2024 revision of the "Law on Guarding State Secrets",[30] state secrets are defined as those that concern:

  1. Major policy decisions on state affairs
  2. The building of national defence and in the activities of the armed forces
  3. Diplomatic activities and in activities related to foreign countries and those to be maintained as commitments to foreign countries
  4. National economic and social development
  5. Science and technology
  6. Activities for preserving state security and the investigation of criminal offences
  7. Any other matters classified as "state secrets" by the national State Secrets Bureau[31]

Secrets can be classified into three categories:

France

In France, classified information is defined by article 413-9 of the Penal Code.[32] The three levels of military classification are

Less sensitive information is "protected". The levels are

A further caveat, French: spécial France (reserved France) restricts the document to French citizens (in its entirety or by extracts). This is not a classification level.

Declassification of documents can be done by the French: Commission consultative du secret de la défense nationale (CCSDN), an independent authority. Transfer of classified information is done with double envelopes, the outer layer being plastified and numbered, and the inner in strong paper. Reception of the document involves examination of the physical integrity of the container and registration of the document. In foreign countries, the document must be transferred through specialised military mail or diplomatic bag. Transport is done by an authorised conveyor or habilitated person for mail under 20 kg. The letter must bear a seal mentioning "French: Par Valise Accompagnee-Sacoche". Once a year, ministers have an inventory of classified information and supports by competent authorities.

Once their usage period is expired, documents are transferred to archives, where they are either destroyed (by incineration, crushing, or overvoltage), or stored.

In case of unauthorized release of classified information, competent authorities are the Ministry of Interior, the 'French: Haut fonctionnaire de défense et de sécurité ("high civil servant for defence and security") of the relevant ministry, and the General secretary for National Defence. Violation of such secrets is an offence punishable with seven years of imprisonment and a 100,000-euro fine; if the offence is committed by imprudence or negligence, the penalties are three years of imprisonment and a 45,000-euro fine.

Hong Kong

The Security Bureau is responsible for developing policies in regards to the protection and handling of confidential government information. In general, the system used in Hong Kong is very similar to the UK system, developed from the colonial era of Hong Kong.

Four classifications exists in Hong Kong, from highest to lowest in sensitivity:[34]

Restricted documents are not classified per se, but only those who have a need to know will have access to such information, in accordance with the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance.[35]

New Zealand

New Zealand uses the Restricted classification, which is lower than Confidential. People may be given access to Restricted information on the strength of an authorisation by their Head of department, without being subjected to the background vetting associated with Confidential, Secret and Top Secret clearances. New Zealand's security classifications and the national-harm requirements associated with their use are roughly similar to those of the United States.

In addition to national security classifications there are two additional security classifications, In Confidence and Sensitive, which are used to protect information of a policy and privacy nature. There are also a number of information markings used within ministries and departments of the government, to indicate, for example, that information should not be released outside the originating ministry.

Because of strict privacy requirements around personal information, personnel files are controlled in all parts of the public and private sectors. Information relating to the security vetting of an individual is usually classified at the In Confidence level.

Romania

In Romania, classified information is referred to as "state secrets" (Romanian; Moldavian; Moldovan: secrete de stat) and is defined by the Penal Code as "documents and data that manifestly appear to have this status or have been declared or qualified as such by decision of Government".[36] There are three levels of classification: "Secret" (Secret/S), "Top Secret" (Strict Secret/SS), and "Top Secret of Particular Importance" (Strict secret de interes deosebit/SSID).[37] The levels are set by the Romanian Intelligence Service and must be aligned with NATO regulations—in case of conflicting regulations, the latter are applied with priority. Dissemination of classified information to foreign agents or powers is punishable by up to life imprisonment, if such dissemination threatens Romania's national security.[38]

Russia

See main article: Classified information in Russia.

In the Russian Federation, a state secret (Государственная тайна) is information protected by the state on its military, foreign policy, economic, intelligence, counterintelligence, operational and investigative and other activities, dissemination of which could harm state security.

Sweden

The Swedish classification has been updated due to increased NATO/PfP cooperation. All classified defence documents will now have both a Swedish classification (Swedish: Kvalificerat hemlig, Swedish: Hemlig, Swedish: Konfidentiell or Swedish: Begränsat Hemlig), and an English classification (Top Secret, Secret, Confidential, or Restricted). The term Swedish: skyddad identitet, "protected identity", is used in the case of protection of a threatened person, basically implying "secret identity", accessible only to certain members of the police force and explicitly authorised officials.

Switzerland

At the federal level, classified information in Switzerland is assigned one of three levels, which are from lowest to highest: Internal, Confidential, Secret.[39] Respectively, these are, in German, German: Intern, German: Vertraulich, German: Geheim; in French, French: Interne, French: Confidentiel, French: Secret; in Italian, Italian: Ad Uso Interno, Italian: Confidenziale, Italian: Segreto. As in other countries, the choice of classification depends on the potential impact that the unauthorised release of the classified document would have on Switzerland, the federal authorities or the authorities of a foreign government.

According to the Ordinance on the Protection of Federal Information, information is classified as Internal if its "disclosure to unauthorised persons may be disadvantageous to national interests." Information classified as Confidential could, if disclosed, compromise "the free formation of opinions and decision-making of the Federal Assembly or the Federal Council," jeopardise national monetary/economic policy, put the population at risk or adversely affect the operations of the Swiss Armed Forces. Finally, the unauthorised release of Secret information could seriously compromise the ability of either the Federal Assembly or the Federal Council to function or impede the ability of the Federal Government or the Armed Forces to act.

Turkey

According to the related regulations in Turkey, there are four levels of document classification:[40] Turkish: çok gizli (top secret), Turkish: gizli (secret), Turkish: özel (confidential) and Turkish: hizmete özel (restricted). The fifth is Turkish: tasnif dışı, which means unclassified.

United Kingdom

See main article: Classified information in the United Kingdom.

Until 2013, the United Kingdom used five levels of classification—from lowest to highest, they were: Protect, Restricted, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret (formerly Most Secret). The Cabinet Office provides guidance on how to protect information, including the security clearances required for personnel. Staff may be required to sign to confirm their understanding and acceptance of the Official Secrets Acts 1911 to 1989, although the Act applies regardless of signature. Protect is not in itself a security protective marking level (such as Restricted or greater), but is used to indicate information which should not be disclosed because, for instance, the document contains tax, national insurance, or other personal information.

Government documents without a classification may be marked as Unclassified or Not Protectively Marked.[41]

This system was replaced by the Government Security Classifications Policy, which has a simpler model: Top Secret, Secret, and Official from April 2014. Official Sensitive is a security marking which may be followed by one of three authorised descriptors: Commercial, LocSen (location sensitive) or Personal. Secret and Top Secret may include a caveat such as UK Eyes Only.

Also useful is that scientific discoveries may be classified via the D-Notice system if they are deemed to have applications relevant to national security. These may later emerge when technology improves so for example the specialised processors and routing engines used in graphics cards are loosely based on top secret military chips designed for code breaking and image processing.They may or may not have safeguards built in to generate errors when specific tasks are attempted and this is invariably independent of the card's operating system.

United States

See main article: Classified information in the United States.

The U.S. classification system is currently established under Executive Order 13526 and has three levels of classification—Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret. The U.S. had a Restricted level during World War II but no longer does. U.S. regulations state that information received from other countries at the Restricted level should be handled as Confidential. A variety of markings are used for material that is not classified, but whose distribution is limited administratively or by other laws, e.g., For Official Use Only (FOUO), or sensitive but unclassified (SBU). The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 provides for the protection of information related to the design of nuclear weapons. The term "Restricted Data" is used to denote certain nuclear technology. Information about the storage, use or handling of nuclear material or weapons is marked "Formerly Restricted Data". These designations are used in addition to level markings (Confidential, Secret and Top Secret). Information protected by the Atomic Energy Act is protected by law and information classified under the Executive Order is protected by Executive privilege.

The U.S. government insists it is "not appropriate" for a court to question whether any document is legally classified.[42] In the 1973 trial of Daniel Ellsberg for releasing the Pentagon Papers, the judge did not allow any testimony from Ellsberg, claiming it was "irrelevant", because the assigned classification could not be challenged. The charges against Ellsberg were ultimately dismissed after it was revealed that the government had broken the law in secretly breaking into the office of Ellsberg's psychiatrist and in tapping his telephone without a warrant. Ellsberg insists that the legal situation in the U.S. in 2014 is worse than it was in 1973, and Edward Snowden could not get a fair trial.[43] The State Secrets Protection Act of 2008 might have given judges the authority to review such questions in camera, but the bill was not passed.

When a government agency acquires classified information through covert means, or designates a program as classified, the agency asserts "ownership" of that information and considers any public availability of it to be a violation of their ownership—even if the same information was acquired independently through "parallel reporting" by the press or others. For example, although the CIA drone program has been widely discussed in public since the early 2000s, and reporters personally observed and reported on drone missile strikes, the CIA still considers the very existence of the program to be classified in its entirety, and any public discussion of it technically constitutes exposure of classified information. "Parallel reporting" was an issue in determining what constitutes "classified" information during the Hillary Clinton email controversy when Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs Julia Frifield noted, "When policy officials obtain information from open sources, 'think tanks,' experts, foreign government officials, or others, the fact that some of the information may also have been available through intelligence channels does not mean that the information is necessarily classified."[44] [45] [46]

Former government intelligence officials are usually able to retain their security clearance, but it is a privilege not a right, with the President being the grantor.[47] The Washington Post reported in an investigation entitled "Top Secret America" that, as of 2010, "An estimated 854,000 people ... hold top-secret security clearances" in the United States.[48]

Clearance

Clearance is a general classification, that comprises a variety of rules controlling the level of permission required to view some classified information, and how it must be stored, transmitted, and destroyed. Additionally, access is restricted on a "need to know" basis. Simply possessing a clearance does not automatically authorize the individual to view all material classified at that level or below that level. The individual must present a legitimate "need to know" in addition to the proper level of clearance.

NOFORN (NF)

The classification markings NOFORN (NF) is information may not be disseminated to any foreign government, foreign national, foreigners, international organizations or any individuals that are not citizens of the United States of America.

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ONLY (FED ONLY)

The document designation classification Federal Employees Only (FED ONLY) is a limited dissemination control established by the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) executive. FED ONLY dissemination controls are authorized only to U.S. Government official employees, executive branch agencies, or United States armed forces of the U.S. Active Guard Reserve.

Federal Employees and Contractors Only (FEDCON)

Federal Employees and Contractors Only (FEDCON) is a limited dissemination control for authorized individuals or employees who enter a contract with the United States to perform a specific job.

Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU)

The document designation marking indicator for Sensitive But Unclassified (SBU) is information that requires special handling and limited dissemination controls that falls under category of the CUI Policy.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is information that falls within a law, regulation, and government-wide policy that require safeguarding to be protected from unauthorized disclosure. No individual may have access to CUI information unless he or she has been granted an authorization.

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

In addition to the general risk-based classification levels, additional compartmented constraints on access exist, such as (in the U.S.) Special Intelligence (SI), which protects intelligence sources and methods, No Foreign dissemination (NoForn), which restricts dissemination to U.S. nationals, and Originator Controlled dissemination (OrCon), which ensures that the originator can track possessors of the information. Information in these compartments is usually marked with specific keywords in addition to the classification level.

Government information about nuclear weapons often has an additional marking to show it contains such information (CNWDI).

Declassification

For originally classified documents, the date of the original classification is scheduled for an automatic declassification of 10 years or 25 years, from the date of original classification. "50X1-HUM" is information that reveals the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source which is exempt from scheduled automatic declassification.[49] "50X2-WMD" is classified information exempt from automatic declassification at 10 years and 25 years that reveal information that reveals key elements and design of weapons of mass destruction assembly, production and deployment.

Table of equivalent classification markings in various countries

(State)Top SecretSecretConfidentialRestricted
AlbaniaAlbanian: Teper SekretAlbanian: SekretAlbanian: KonfidencialAlbanian: I Kufizuar
ArgentinaSpanish; Castilian: Estrictamente Secreto y ConfidencialStrictly Secret and ConfidentialSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSecretSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialConfidentialSpanish; Castilian: ReservadoReserved
ArmeniaArmenian: Հատուկ կարևորության
Of Special Importance
Armenian: Հույժ գաղտնի
Top Secret
Armenian: Գաղտնի
Secret[50]
Armenian: Ծառայողական օգտագործման համար
For Service Use
AustraliaTop SecretSecretRetired 2018. No equivalent level for historical classificationUS, French, EU, Japan "Confidential" marking to be handled as SECRET.[51] Protected
AustriaGerman: Streng GeheimGerman: GeheimGerman: VertraulichGerman: Eingeschränkt
BelgiumDutch; Flemish: Zeer Geheim / French: Très SecretDutch; Flemish: Geheim / French: SecretDutch; Flemish: Vertrouwelijk / French: ConfidentielDutch; Flemish: Beperkte Verspreiding / French: Diffusion restreinte
BoliviaSpanish; Castilian: Supersecreto
or Spanish; Castilian: Muy Secreto
Spanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
Bosnia and HerzegovinaCroatian: Vrlo tajnoCroatian: TajnoCroatian: PovjerljivoCroatian: Interno
BrazilPortuguese: UltrassecretoPortuguese: SecretoPortuguese: Reservado
BulgariaBulgarian: Strògo sèkretno
Bulgarian: Строго секретно
Bulgarian: Sèkretno
Bulgarian: Секретно
Bulgarian: Poveritèlno
Bulgarian: Поверително
Bulgarian: Za služebno polzvàne
Bulgarian: За служебно ползване
CambodiaCentral Khmer: Sam Ngat BamphotCentral Khmer: Sam Ngat RoeungCentral Khmer: Art KambangCentral Khmer: Ham Kom Psay
CanadaTop Secret/French: Très secretSecret/French: SecretConfidential/French: ConfidentielProtected A, B or C/French: Protégé A, B ou C
ChileSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ReservadoSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
ChinaChinese: Juémì (Chinese: 绝密)Top SecretChinese: Jīmì (Chinese: 机密)Highly SecretChinese: Mìmì (Chinese: 秘密)SecretChinese: Nèibù (Chinese: 内部)Internal
ColombiaSpanish; Castilian: UltrasecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reserva del sumario
Costa RicaSpanish; Castilian: Alto SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: Confidencial 
CroatiaCroatian: Vrlo tajnoCroatian: TajnoCroatian: PovjerljivoCroatian: Ograničeno
Czech RepublicCzech: Přísně tajnéCzech: TajnéCzech: DůvěrnéCzech: Vyhrazené
DenmarkDanish: Yderst Hemmeligt (YHM)Danish: Hemmeligt (HEM)Danish: Fortroligt (FTR)Danish: Til Tjenestebrug (TTJ)
Foreign Service: Danish: Fortroligt
(thin black border)
EcuadorSpanish; Castilian: SecretisimoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
Egypt
Arabic: سري للغاية

Arabic: سري جداً

Arabic: خاص

Arabic: محظور
El SalvadorSpanish; Castilian: Ultra SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
EstoniaEstonian: Täiesti salajaneEstonian: SalajaneEstonian: KonfidentsiaalneEstonian: Piiratud
EthiopiaAmharic: ብርቱ ምስጢርAmharic: ምስጢርAmharic: ጥብቅAmharic: ክልክል
European Union (EU)French: Tres Secret UE / EU Top SecretFrench: Secret UE / EU SecretFrench: Confidentiel UE / EU ConfidentialFrench: Restreint UE / EU Restricted
European Union (Western) (WEU)Focal top secretWEU SecretWEU ConfidentialWEU Restricted
EuratomEURA Top SecretEURA SecretEURA ConfidentialEURA Restricted
FinlandFinnish: Erittäin salainen (TL I)Finnish: Salainen (TL II)Finnish: Luottamuksellinen (TL III)Finnish: Käyttö rajoitettu (TL IV)
FranceFrench: Très secretFrench: SecretFrench: SecretFrench: Diffusion restreinte
GermanyGerman: Streng GeheimTop SecretGerman: GeheimSecretGerman: VS-VertraulichConfidentialGerman: VS-Nur Für Den DienstgebrauchFor Official Use Only
GreeceGreek, Modern (1453-);: Άκρως ΑπόρρητονTop SecretGreek, Modern (1453-);: ΑπόρρητονSecretGreek, Modern (1453-);: ΕμπιστευτικόνConfidentialGreek, Modern (1453-);: Περιορισμένης
Greek, Modern (1453-);: ΧρήσηςLimited Use
GuatemalaSpanish; Castilian: Alto SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
HaitiTop SecretSecretConfidentialReserve
HondurasSpanish; Castilian: Super SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
Hong KongTop Secret, Chinese: 高度機密Secret, Chinese: 機密Confidential, Chinese: 保密Restricted, Chinese: 內部文件/限閱文件
HungaryHungarian: Szigorúan TitkosTop SecretHungarian: TitkosSecretHungarian: BizalmasConfidentialHungarian: Korlátozott TerjesztésűRestricted Distribution
India (Hindi)Hindi: परम गुप्त (Hindi: Param Gupt)Hindi: गुप्त (Hindi: Gupt)Hindi: गोपनीय (Hindi: Gopniya)प्Hindi: रतिबंधित/सीमित (Hindi: Pratibandhit/seemit)
India (English)Top SecretSecretConfidentialRestricted
IndonesiaIndonesian: Sangat RahasiaIndonesian: RahasiaIndonesian: Rahasia DinasIndonesian: Terbatas
IranPersian: Bekoli-Serri Persian: بکلی سریPersian: Serri Persian: سریPersian: Kheili-Mahramaneh Persian: خیلی محرمانهPersian: Mahramaneh Persian: محرمانه
Iraq
Arabic: سري للغاية

Arabic: سري

Arabic: خاص

Arabic: محدود
IcelandIcelandic: Algert LeyndarmálAbsolute SecretIcelandic: LeyndarmálSecretIcelandic: TrúnaðarmálConfidentialIcelandic: ÞjónustuskjalService Document
Ireland (Irish language)Irish: An-sicréideachIrish: SicréideachIrish: RúndaIrish: Srianta
IsraelHebrew: Sodi Beyoter
Hebrew: סודי ביותר
Hebrew: Sodi
Hebrew: סודי
Hebrew: Shamur
Hebrew: שמור
Hebrew: Mugbal
Hebrew: מוגבל
ItalyItalian: SegretissimoItalian: SegretoItalian: RiservatissimoItalian: Riservato
Japan
Jordan
Arabic: مكتوم جداً

Arabic: مكتوم

Arabic: سري

Arabic: محدود
South Korea1Korean: (Il)-geup Bimil, Korean: 1급 비밀, 一級秘密Class 1 Secret2Korean: (I)-geup Bimil, Korean: 2급 비밀, 二級秘密Class 2 Secret3Korean: (Sam)-geup Bimil, Korean: 3급 비밀, 三級秘密Class 3 SecretKorean: Daeoebi, Korean: 대외비, 對外秘Confidential
LaosLao: Lup Sood GnodLao: Kuam LupLao: Kuam LapLao: Chum Kut Kon Arn
LatviaLatvian: Sevišķi slepeniLatvian: SlepeniLatvian: KonfidenciāliLatvian: Dienesta vajadzībām
LebanonFrench: Tres SecretFrench: SecretFrench: Confidentiel 
LithuaniaLithuanian: Visiškai SlaptaiLithuanian: SlaptaiLithuanian: KonfidencialiaiLithuanian: Riboto Naudojimo
MalaysiaMalay: Rahsia BesarMalay: RahsiaMalay: SulitMalay: Terhad
MexicoSpanish; Castilian: Ultra SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Restringido
MontenegroCroatian: Strogo TajnoCroatian: TajnoCroatian: PovjerljivoCroatian: Interno
Netherlands[52] Dutch; Flemish: STG. Zeer GeheimDutch; Flemish: STG. GeheimDutch; Flemish: STG. ConfidentieelDutch; Flemish: Departementaal Vertrouwelijk
New ZealandTop SecretSecretConfidentialRestricted
NicaraguaSpanish; Castilian: Alto SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
NorwayNorwegian: STRENGT HEMMELIGNorwegian: HEMMELIGNorwegian: KONFIDENSIELTNorwegian: BEGRENSET
Pakistan (Urdu)Urdu: Intahai Khufia
Urdu: انتہائی خفیہ
Urdu: Khufia
Urdu: خفیہ
Urdu: Sigh-e-Raz
Urdu: صیخہ راز
Urdu: Barai Mahdud Taqsim
Urdu: محدود تقسیم
Pakistan (English)Top SecretSecretConfidentialRestricted
ParaguaySpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
PeruSpanish; Castilian: Estrictamente SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
Philippines (English)Philippines (Tagalog)Top SecretTagalog: Matinding Lihim
SecretTagalog: Mahigpit na Lihim
ConfidentialTagalog: Lihim
RestrictedTagalog: Ipinagbabawal
PolandPolish: Ściśle tajnePolish: TajnePolish: PoufnePolish: Zastrzeżone
PortugalPortuguese: Muito SecretoPortuguese: SecretoPortuguese: ConfidencialPortuguese: Reservado
RomaniaRomanian; Moldavian; Moldovan: Strict Secret de Importanță DeosebităStrict Secret of Special ImportanceRomanian; Moldavian; Moldovan: Strict SecretRomanian; Moldavian; Moldovan: SecretRomanian; Moldavian; Moldovan: Secret de serviciuSecret for Service Use
RussiaRussian: Особой важности
(Russian: вариант: Совершенно Секретно (Russian: Sovershenno Sekretno))Of Special Importance (variant: Completely Secret)
Russian: Совершенно секретно
(Russian: вариант: Секретно (Russian: Sekretno))Completely Secret (variant: Secret)
Russian: Секретно
(Russian: вариант: Не подлежит оглашению
(Russian: Конфиденциально) (Russian: Ne podlezhit oglasheniyu (Konfidentsial'no))Secret (variant: Not To Be Disclosed (Confidential))
Russian: Для Служебного Пользования (ДСП)
(Russian: Dlya Sluzhebnogo Pol'zovaniya)For Official Use
Saudi ArabiaSaudi Top SecretSaudi Very SecretSaudi SecretSaudi Restricted
SerbiaCyrillic: Serbian: Државна тајна
Latin: Serbian: Državna tajnaState Secret
Cyrillic: Serbian: Строго поверљиво
Latin: Serbian: Strogo poverljivoStrictly Confidential
Cyrillic: Serbian: Поверљиво
Latin: Serbian: PoverljivoConfidential
Cyrillic: Serbian: Интерно
Latin: Serbian: InternoInternal
SingaporeTop SecretSecretConfidentialRestricted
SomaliaSomali: Sir Muhiim ahSomali: Sir GooniyaSomali: Xog QarsoonSomali: Qarsoon
Slovak RepublicSlovak: Prísne tajnéSlovak: TajnéSlovak: DôvernéSlovak: Vyhradené
SloveniaSlovenian: Strogo tajnoSlovenian: TajnoSlovenian: ZaupnoSlovenian: Interno
SpainSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ReservadoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Difusión Limitada
Sri Lankaඅති රහස්‍යරහස්‍යරහසිගතසීමාන්විත
SwedenSwedish: Kvalificerat hemlig (KH); Swedish: Hemlig/Top Secret (H/TS)Swedish: Hemlig (H); Swedish: Hemlig/Secret (H/S)Swedish: Konfidentiell
Swedish: Hemlig/Confidential (H/C)
Swedish: Begränsat hemlig
Swedish: Hemlig/Restricted (H/R)
SwitzerlandGerman: Geheim / French: SecretGerman: Vertraulich / French: ConfidentielGerman: Intern / French: Interne
Taiwan (Republic of China)[53] Top Secret (絕對機密)Secret (極機密)Confidential (機密)
Tanzania (Swahili)Swahili: Siri KuuSwahili: SiriSwahili: StiriSwahili: Imezuiliwa
ThailandThai: Lap thi sut (Thai: ลับที่สุด)Most SecretThai: Lap mak (Thai: ลับมาก)Very SecretThai: Lap (Thai: ลับ)SecretThai: Pok pit (Thai: ปกปิด)Restricted
TurkeyTurkish: Çok GizliTop SecretTurkish: GizliSecretTurkish: ÖzelConfidentialTurkish: Hizmete ÖzelRestricted
South Africa (English)Top SecretSecretConfidentialRestricted
South Africa (Afrikaans)Afrikaans: Uiters GeheimAfrikaans: GeheimAfrikaans: VertroulikAfrikaans: Beperk
UkraineUkrainian: Особливої важливостіUkrainian: Цілком таємноUkrainian: ТаємноUkrainian: Для службового користування
United KingdomTop Secret (until 1942: Most Secret)Secret(formerly Confidential) abolished in 2014[54] Official-Sensitive (formerly Restricted)
United StatesTop SecretSecretConfidential
UruguaySpanish; Castilian: Ultra SecretoSpanish; Castilian: SecretoSpanish; Castilian: ConfidencialSpanish; Castilian: Reservado
VietnamVietnamese: Tuyệt mậtVietnamese: Tối mậtVietnamese: Tài liệu mậtVietnamese: Hạn chế phổ biến
Table notes:

Table source: Web site: US Department of Defense . United States Department of Defense . National Industrial Security Program - Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M) . 27 July 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190727225319/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a291750.pdf . 27 July 2019 . B1 - B3 (PDF pages:121–123) . live . January 1995.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Turner, Stansfield . Stansfield Turner . Burn Before Reading: Presidents, CIA Directors and Secret Intelligence . New York . Hyperion . 2005 . 9780786867820 . registration .
  2. Web site: Classified Information in Woodward's 'Obama's Wars' . Jack . Goldsmith . Lawfare . 29 September 2010 . 5 September 2015 . 13 January 2024 . https://web.archive.org/web/20240113124838/https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/classified-information-woodwards-obamas-wars . live .
  3. Book: Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary. 2004. Random House. New York [u.a.]. 0375425993. 2. ed., [Nachdr.].
  4. Web site: Defense Technical Information Center . Defense Technical Information Center . April 1997 . DoD Guide to Marking Classified Documents . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20190524214955/https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA340216 . 24 May 2019 . dtic.mil.
  5. Web site: Federation of American Scientists . Federation of American Scientists . 8 June 2013 . Chapter 7. Classification Levels . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20180504165852/https://fas.org/sgp/library/quist2/chap_7.html#1 . 4 May 2018 . 12 December 2015 . fas.org.
  6. Web site: E-PME Enlisted Professional Military Education Reporting Unsecured and Securing Classified Material 4.G.03. United States Coast Guard. https://web.archive.org/web/20131029204918/http://www.uscg.mil/petaluma/e-pme/e-pme/apprentice/G-Lessons/4-G-03.pdf. 29 October 2013. dead.
  7. Web site: Attachment 2 AR 320-5, Classification of OFC. Army Regulations (1936) . George Washington University . George Washington University . gwu.edu . 16 June 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130713152933/http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/radiation/dir/mstreet/commeet/meet14/brief14/tab_d/br14d1b.txt . 13 July 2013 . dead .
  8. Web site: Frequently Asked Questions- E.O. 13526 and 32 CFR Part 2001 . National Archives . Information Security Oversight Office . 2 December 2025.
  9. Book: Government Security Classifications April 2014. October 2013. HMG Cabinet Office. 27 April 2022. 30 January 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20220427171035/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-security-classifications. live.
  10. Web site: Employment Background Checks: A Jobseeker's Guide | Privacy Rights Clearinghouse . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120109003413/http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs16-bck.htm . 9 January 2012 . 12 December 2011 . Privacyrights.org.
  11. Web site: Internet . JSK . Ochrona Informacji Niejawnych Międzynarodowych W Sferze Cywilnej I Wojskowej – Ochrona informacji niejawnych międzynarodowych w sferze cywilnej i wojskowej – BIP – Agencja Bezpieczeństwa Wewnętrznego . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20181026192541/http://www.bip.abw.gov.pl/bip/informacje-niejawne-1/ochrona-informacji-nie/153,OCHRONA-INFORMACJI-NIEJAWNYCH-MIEDZYNARODOWYCH-W-SFERZE-CYWILNEJ-I-WOJSKOWEJ.html . 26 October 2018 . 28 February 2018 . bip.abw.gov.pl.
  12. Web site: NATO Security Indoctrination. 11 March 2023. 4 February 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200204135739/http://act.nato.int/images/stories/structure/reserve/hqrescomp/nato-security-brief.pdf. dead.
  13. Web site: NATO Refresher Briefing . deviated . https://web.archive.org/web/20231121144254/https://wpcontent.ot5o9s93syrb.net/wp-content/uploads/NATORefresherBriefing.pdf . 21 November 2023 . 21 November 2023.
  14. Web site: Government of Canada . Public Services and Procurement Canada . 30 August 2018 . Chapter 9: Security requirements for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization – Industrial Security Manual – Security requirements for contracting with the Government of Canada – Canada.ca . deviated . https://web.archive.org/web/20200220023959/https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/esc-src/msi-ism/chap9-eng.html . 20 February 2020 . 10 September 2020 . tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca.
  15. Web site: Decision of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information . 15 October 2013 . Official Journal of the European Union . 5 September 2015 . 17 October 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20151017171415/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:274:0001:0050:EN:PDF . live .
  16. Web site: Rettman . Andrew . What is 'SECRET UE' anyway? . euobserver . 24 September 2012 . 28 March 2024 . 28 March 2024 . https://web.archive.org/web/20240328021935/https://euobserver.com/secret-ue/117634 . live .
  17. Web site: 306652_CM6554 . 14 November 2012. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20050525181742/http://www.fco.gov.uk/Files/kfile/306652_CM6554.pdf. 25 May 2005.
  18. Web site: UN Secretariat . 12 February 2007 . Information sensitivity, classification and handling . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20231208222405/https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/593127 . 8 December 2023 . 2024-05-21 . digitallibrary.un.org.
  19. Web site: Development of Policies for Protection of Critical Information Infrastructures . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20150924090314/http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/10/40761118.pdf . 24 September 2015 . 14 November 2012 . Cecd.ord.
  20. Web site: 'Re: OpenSSH security advisory: cbc.adv' – MARC . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20131028111638/http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=122754275122010&w=2 . 28 October 2013 . 12 December 2011 . Marc.info.
  21. Web site: Policy 8: Sensitive and classified information . 17 April 2022 . Protective Security Policy Framework . 11 January 2024 . https://web.archive.org/web/20240111021701/https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/system/files/2023-11/policy-8-classification-system-pspf_0.pdf . dead .
  22. Web site: Brazil. Palácio do Planalto. . LEI Nº 12.527, DE 18 DE NOVEMBRO DE 2011 . 11 March 2024 . 15 March 2024 . https://web.archive.org/web/20240315074445/http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm . live .
  23. Web site: Informações Classificadas e Desclassificadas . Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública . Brazilian Government . 30 January 2024.
  24. http://www.csis.gc.ca/nwsrm/bckgrndrs/bckgrndr12-eng.asp Security of Information Act
  25. Web site: Industrial Security Services – Frequently Asked Questions . https://web.archive.org/web/20131120011009/http://ssi-iss.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/questions/esp-pss-eng.html#q4 . dead . 20 November 2013 . Public Works and Government Services Canada . Government of Canada . 8 November 2012 .
  26. Web site: 2025-01-27 . Persons Permanently Bound to Secrecy – To Protect National Security . 2025-05-05 . canada.ca.
  27. Web site: Archived – Non-Insured Health Benefits Program: Privacy Code, 2005 (Appendix II) . Health Canada, First Nations and Inuit Health Branch . 2015 . 5 September 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150924043739/http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fniah-spnia/pubs/nihb-ssna/_priv/2005_code/index-eng.php#app2 . 24 September 2015 . dead .
  28. Web site: Security Policy – Manager's Handbook. https://web.archive.org/web/20050601030559/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/gospubs/TB_J2/dwnld/spmh_e.rtf. dead. 1 June 2005.
  29. Web site: Archived – Access to Information Guidelines – Confidences of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada . Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat . 2015 . 5 September 2015 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20151017171415/http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=25487&section=text%3DTrue . 17 October 2015 .
  30. Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, "Law on Guarding State Secrets". (中华人民共和国保守国家秘密法), promulgated 1988 and effective 1989.
  31. Translation per Human Rights in China, State Secrets: China's Legal Labyrinth, (2007).
  32. Web site: Code pénal – Article 413-9 . Legifrance . 2009 . 5 September 2015 . 17 October 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20151017171415/http://legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070719&idArticle=LEGIARTI000020933029&dateTexte=20150905 . live .
  33. https://www.sgdsn.gouv.fr/files/files/Nos_missions/plaquette-de-presentation-de-la-reforme-psdn-num-v20211001.pdf Secretariat-General for National Defence and Security, 2021 reform leaflet
  34. Web site: 政府公文寫作手冊 - 總論 . 1997 . zh . https://web.archive.org/web/20061201013917/http://www.csb.gov.hk/hkgcsb/doclib/general.pdf . 1 December 2006 . dead .
  35. Web site: LCQ3: Equal Opportunities Commission. https://web.archive.org/web/20081227080400/http://www.hab.gov.hk/en/publications_and_press_releases/press_releases_speeches/equal_opportunities/191103q3.htm. dead. 27 December 2008.
  36. Web site: Penal Code of Romania, art. 150 . 28 January 2013 . 26 March 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130326005643/http://legeaz.net/cod-penal-actualizat-2011/art-150-cpen . live .
  37. Web site: Law no. 182/2002 on protection of classified information . 28 January 2013 . 6 January 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130106172235/http://legislatie.resurse-pentru-democratie.org/182_2002.php . dead .
  38. Web site: Penal Code of Romania, art. 157 . 28 January 2013 . 26 March 2013 . https://web.archive.org/web/20130326030726/http://legeaz.net/cod-penal-actualizat-2011/art-157-cpen . live .
  39. Web site: Ordinance on the Protection of Federal Information. 1 January 2018. Swiss Federal Government. 29 January 2020. 30 January 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200130041935/https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20070574/index.html. live.
  40. Diri . Mustafa . Gülçiçek . Mirac . Türkiye'de Kamu Hizmetinin Görülmesinde Kullanılmakta Olan Gizlilik Derecesi Tanımları : Uygulamadaki Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri . Maliye Dergisi . 2012 . 162 . 497–537 . tr . 6 July 2021 . 19 August 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210706180154/https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2019/09/26.pdf . live .
  41. Web site: Understanding the Security Policy Framework & frequently asked questions . Cabinet Office . 1 April 2013 . 5 September 2015 . 11 November 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20091111121358/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/spf/faqs.aspx . live .
  42. Aftergood . Steven . Steven Aftergood . 27 August 2014 . Gov't Resists Court Review of State Secrets . Secrecy News . Federation of American Scientists . 26 September 2014 . 11 September 2014 . https://web.archive.org/web/20140911175505/http://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2014/08/review-state-secrets/ . live .
  43. News: Ellsberg . Daniel . Daniel Ellsberg . 30 May 2014 . Daniel Ellsberg: Snowden would not get a fair trial – and Kerry is wrong . The Guardian . 26 September 2014 . 5 August 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220805175647/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/30/daniel-ellsberg-snowden-fair-trial-kerry-espionage-act . live .
  44. Web site: DoD Warns Employees of Classified Info in Public Domain . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20210309020406/https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2013/06/dod-classified/ . 9 March 2021 . 11 March 2023 . fas.org.
  45. News: Myers . Steven Lee . Mazzetti . Mark . Mark Mazzetti . and . 5 February 2016 . Agencies Battle Over What Is 'Top Secret' in Hillary Clinton's Emails . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040432/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/06/us/politics/agencies-battle-over-what-is-top-secret-in-hillary-clintons-emails.html . 26 February 2021 . 3 April 2019 . The New York Times.
  46. News: DeYoung . Karen . Karen DeYoung . December 19, 2011 . Secrecy defines Obama's drone war . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20210224221855/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/secrecy-defines-obamas-drone-war/2011/10/28/gIQAPKNR5O_story.html . 24 February 2021 . 3 April 2019 . The Washington Post.
  47. Spracher, William C. “The Use and Abuse of Intelligence as a Political Weapon: Can the U.S. Avoid the Latin American Model?” American Intelligence Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, 2020, pp. 143–54. JSTOR website Retrieved 13 Feb. 2025.
  48. News: Priest . Dana . Dana Priest . Arkin . William M. . William Arkin . and . 19 July 2010 . A hidden world, growing beyond control . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20100720183755/http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/articles/a-hidden-world-growing-beyond-control/ . 20 July 2010 . 5 September 2015 . The Washington Post.
  49. Web site: 2014-09-09 . Open Government Declassification Frequently Asked Questions . 2025-05-25 . www.justice.gov . en . 25 May 2025 . https://web.archive.org/web/20250525072358/https://www.justice.gov/archives/open/declassification/declassification-faq . live .
  50. Book: Republic of Armenia Law on State and Service Secrets . 23 December 1996 . . . 1123–1124 . Hy.
  51. Web site: Policy 7: Security governance for international sharing . 17 April 2022 . Protective Security Policy Framework . 17 April 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220417113450/https://www.protectivesecurity.gov.au/publications-library/policy-7-security-governance-international-sharing . dead .
  52. Web site: Besluit Voorschrift Informatiebeveiliging Rijksdienst Bijzondere Informatie 2013 (VIRBI 2013) . nl . Wetten.overheid.nl . 14 January 2023 . 14 January 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230114150959/https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0033507/2013-06-01/0 . live .
  53. Web site: The Classified National Security Information Protection Act . 6 February 2003 . 26 March 2014 . 17 October 2015 . https://web.archive.org/web/20151017171415/http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=I0060003 . live .
  54. Web site: Government Classification Scheme . Ministry of Justice Security Guidance . Ministry of Justice . 2 February 2023 . 2 February 2023 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230202231016/https://security-guidance.service.justice.gov.uk/government-classification-scheme/#government-classification-scheme . live .