
In mathematics, the dimension of a partially ordered set (poset) is the smallest number of total orders the intersection of which gives rise to the partial order.This concept is also sometimes called the order dimension or the Dushnik–Miller dimension of the partial order. first studied order dimension; for a more detailed treatment of this subject than provided here, see .
The order dimension of a poset
P
t
lR=(<1,...,<t)
of linear extensions of
P
x
y
P
x
y
P
y
t
P
| t | |
| P=caplR=cap | |
| i=1 |
<i.
An alternative definition of order dimension is the minimal number of total orders such that P embeds into their product with componentwise ordering i.e.
x\leqy
xi\leqyi
A family
lR=(<1,...,<t)
X
P=(X,<P)
<P=caplR
which is to say that for any
x
y
X
x<Py
x<1y,x<2y
x<ty
P
P
It can be shown that any nonempty family
lR
P
(x,y)
P
x<iy
<i
lR
Let n be a positive integer, and let P be the partial order on the elements ai and bi (for 1 ≤ i ≤ n) in which ai ≤ bj whenever i ≠j, but no other pairs are comparable. In particular, ai and bi are incomparable in P; P can be viewed as an oriented form of a crown graph. The illustration shows an ordering of this type for n = 4.
Then, for each i, any realizer must contain a linear order that begins with all the aj except ai (in some order), then includes bi, then ai, and ends with all the remaining bj. This is so because if there were a realizer that didn't include such an order, then the intersection of that realizer's orders would have ai preceding bi, which would contradict the incomparability of ai and bi in P. And conversely, any family of linear orders that includes one order of this type for each i has P as its intersection. Thus, P has dimension exactly n. In fact, P is known as the standard example of a poset of dimension n, and is usually denoted by Sn.
The partial orders with order dimension two may be characterized as the partial orders whose comparability graph is the complement of the comparability graph of a different partial order . That is, P is a partial order with order dimension two if and only if there exists a partial order Q on the same set of elements, such that every pair x, y of distinct elements is comparable in exactly one of these two partial orders. If P is realized by two linear extensions, then partial order Q complementary to P may be realized by reversing one of the two linear extensions. Therefore, the comparability graphs of the partial orders of dimension two are exactly the permutation graphs, graphs that are both themselves comparability graphs and complementary to comparability graphs.
The partial orders of order dimension two include the series-parallel partial orders . They are exactly the partial orders whose Hasse diagrams have dominance drawings, which can be obtained by using the positions in the two permutations of a realizer as Cartesian coordinates.
It is possible to determine in polynomial time whether a given finite partially ordered set has order dimension at most two, for instance, by testing whether the comparability graph of the partial order is a permutation graph. However, for any k ≥ 3, it is NP-complete to test whether the order dimension is at most k .
The incidence poset of any undirected graph G has the vertices and edges of G as its elements; in this poset, x ≤ y if either x = y or x is a vertex, y is an edge, and x is an endpoint of y. Certain kinds of graphs may be characterized by the order dimensions of their incidence posets: a graph is a path graph if and only if the order dimension of its incidence poset is at most two, and according to Schnyder's theorem it is a planar graph if and only if the order dimension of its incidence poset is at most three .
For a complete graph on n vertices, the order dimension of the incidence poset is
\Theta(loglogn)
O(loglogn)
Schnyder's theorem can be generalized for the vertex-edge-face incidence poset, denoted by
PM
M
x<y
x
y
x
y
x<y
x
y
x
y
It was shown by that the order dimension of the vertex-edge-face incidence poset of a planar map (planar graph with fixed plane embedding) is at most four.
later proved in "The order dimension of planar maps revisited " that
dim(bf{split}(PM))\leq4
For an order
P=(X,<)
bf{split}
bf{split}(P)=(X'\cupX'',<s)
X'
X''
X
<s
x'<sx'' \forallx\inX
x'<sy''
x<y
It is to be noted, that
dim(P)\leqdim(bf{split}(P))\leqdim(P)+1
Felsner's proof of that the order dimension of the split incidence poset is at most four constructs a grid intersection representation of the respective planar map in which incidences correspond to intersections of axis-parallel segments. This representation makes it possible to construct four linear extensions whose intersection realizes the split incidence poset, establishing the dimension bound of four.
A generalization of dimension is the notion of k-dimension (written
rm{dim}k