
In mathematics, a quasi-analytic class of functions is a generalization of the class of real analytic functions based upon the following fact: If f is an analytic function on an interval [''a'',''b''] ⊂ R, and at some point f and all of its derivatives are zero, then f is identically zero on all of [''a'',''b'']. Quasi-analytic classes are broader classes of functions for which this statement still holds true.
Let
M=\{Mk\}
| infty | |
| k=0 |
\left|
| dkf | |
| dxk |
(x)\right|\leqAk+1k!Mk
for all x ∈ [''a'',''b''], some constant A, and all non-negative integers k. If Mk = 1 this is exactly the class of real analytic functions on [''a'',''b''].
The class CM([''a'',''b'']) is said to be quasi-analytic if whenever f ∈ CM([''a'',''b'']) and
| dkf | |
| dxk |
(x)=0
A function f is called a quasi-analytic function if f is in some quasi-analytic class.
For a function
f:Rn\toR
j=(j1,j2,\ldots,j
| n | |
| n)\inN |
|j|=j1+j2+\ldots+jn
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| D |
j!=j1!j2!\ldotsjn!
| j1 | |
| x | |
| 1 |
| j2 | |
| x | |
| 2 |
\ldots
| jn | |
| x | |
| n |
.
Then
f
U\subsetRn
K\subsetU
A
\left|Djf(x)\right|\leqA|j|+1j!M|j|
for all multi-indexes
j\inNn
x\inK
The Denjoy-Carleman class of functions of
n
M
U
| M(U) | |
| C | |
| n |
The Denjoy-Carleman class
| M(U) | |
| C | |
| n |
A function of several variables is said to be quasi-analytic when it belongs to a quasi-analytic Denjoy-Carleman class.
In the definitions above it is possible to assume that
M1=1
Mk
The sequence
Mk
Mk+1/Mk
When
Mk
| 1/k | |
| (M | |
| k) |
MrMs\leqMr+s
(r,s)\inN2
The quasi-analytic class
| M | |
| C | |
| n |
M
| M | |
| C | |
| n |
| M | |
| C | |
| n |
f=(f1,f2,\ldotsfp)\in
| M) | |
| (C | |
| n |
p
g\in
| M | |
| C | |
| p |
g\circf\in
| M | |
| C | |
| n |
The Denjoy–Carleman theorem, proved by after gave some partial results, gives criteria on the sequence M under which CM([''a'',''b'']) is a quasi-analytic class. It states that the following conditions are equivalent:
\sum1/Lj=infty
Lj=infk\ge(k ⋅
| 1/k | |
| M | |
| k |
)
\sumj
| 1 | |
| j |
| *) | |
| (M | |
| j |
-1/j=infty
| \sum | ||||||||||||||||
|
=infty.
The proof that the last two conditions are equivalent to the second uses Carleman's inequality.
Example: pointed out that if Mn is given by one of the sequences
1,{(lnn)}n,{(lnn)}n{(lnlnn)}n,{(lnn)}n{(lnlnn)}n{(lnlnlnn)}n,...,
For a logarithmically convex sequence
M
CM
\supj\geq
| 1/j | |
| (M | |
| j) |
<infty
N
Mj\leqCjNj
C
CM\subsetCN
CM
\supj\geq(Mj+1
| 1/j | |
| /M | |
| j) |
<infty
f
CM
CN
g\inCM
h\inCN
f=g+h
A function
g:Rn\toR
d
xn
g(0,xn)=h(xn)x
| d | |
| n |
h(0) ≠ 0
g
d
xn
An
n
g
f\inAn
q\inA
h1,h2,\ldots,hd-1\inAn-1
f=gq+h
h(x',xn)=\sum
| d-1 | |
| j=0 |
hj
| j | |
| (x')x | |
| n |
While the ring of analytic functions and the ring of formal power series both satisfy the Weierstrass division property, the same is not true for other quasi-analytic classes.
If
M
CM
CM
g(x1,x2,\ldots,xn)=x1+x
| 2 | |
| 2 |