Catachresis Explained

Catachresis (from Greek Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: κατάχρησις, 'misuse'), originally meaning a semantic misuse or error, is also the name given to many different types of figures of speech in which a word or phrase is being applied in a way that significantly departs from conventional (or traditional) usage.[1] Examples of the original meaning include using "militate" for "mitigate", "chronic" for "severe", "travesty" for "tragedy", "anachronism" for "anomaly", "alibi" for "excuse", etc. As a rhetorical figure, catachresis may signify an unexpected or implausible metaphor.[2]

Variant definitions

There are various characterizations of catachresis found in literature.

Definition Example
Crossing categorical boundaries with words, because there otherwise would be no suitable word.[3] [4] The sustainers of a chair being referred to as legs.
Replacing an expected word with another, half rhyming (or a partly sound-alike) word, with an entirely different meaning from what one would expect (cf. malapropism, Spoonerism, aphasia).[5] "I'm ravished!" for "I'm ravenous" or for "I'm famished!""They build a horse" instead of "They build a house".
The strained use of an already existing word or phrase.[6] "Tis deepest winter in Lord Timon's purse." – Shakespeare, Timon of Athens
The replacement of a word with a more ambiguous synonym (cf. euphemism).[7] Saying job-seeker instead of unemployed.

Examples

Dead people in a graveyard being referred to as inhabitants is an example of catachresis.[8]

Example from Alexander Pope's Peri Bathous, Or the Art of Sinking in Poetry:

Masters of this [catachresis] will say,

Mow the beard,

Shave the grass,

Pin the plank,

Nail my sleeve.[9]

Use in literature

Catachresis is often used to convey extreme emotion or alienation. It is prominent in baroque literature and, more recently, in dadaist and surrealist literature.

Use in philosophy and criticism

In Jacques Derrida's ideas of deconstruction, catachresis refers to the original incompleteness that is a part of all systems of meaning. He proposes that metaphor and catachresis are tropes that ground philosophical discourse.

Postcolonial theorist Gayatri Spivak applies this word to "master words" that claim to represent a group, e.g., women or the proletariat, when there are no "true" examples of "woman" or "proletarian". In a similar way, words that are imposed upon people and are deemed improper thus denote a catachresis, a word with an arbitrary connection to its meaning.

See also

Reading

Notes and References

  1. Book: Anshuman Sharma. The Impact – The Art of Communicating Eloquently. 16 April 2014. Anshuman Sharma. 978-1-105-99521-7. 78.
  2. Book: Lanham, Richard A. . A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms . University of California Press . 1991 . 0-520-07669-9 . 2nd . Berkeley . 31.
  3. [Max Black]
  4. Pierre Fontanier, Les Figures du discours (Paris: Flammarion, 1977 [orig. 1821–1830]), p. 214.
  5. Web site: Henry Peachum., The Garden of Eloquence (1593): Tropes, part Tropes, Catachresis . Perseus.tufts.edu . 13 May 2013.
  6. Book: John Van Sickle. Virgil's Book of Bucolics, the Ten Eclogues Translated into English Verse: Framed by Cues for Reading Aloud and Clues for Threading Texts and Themes. 29 December 2010. JHU Press. 978-0-8018-9961-4. 18.
  7. Book: Paul Maurice Clogan. Historical Inquiries. 1 January 1997. Rowman & Littlefield. 978-0-8476-8674-2. 19.
  8. Book: Jonathan Arac. Impure Worlds: The Institution of Literature in the Age of the Novel. 2011. Fordham Univ Press. 978-0-8232-3178-2. 143.
  9. Pope, Peri Bathous, Or the Art of Sinking in Poetry, x