Open-mindedness explained

Open-mindedness is receptiveness to new ideas. Open-mindedness relates to the way in which people approach the views and knowledge of others. Jason Baehr defines an open-minded person as one who "characteristically moves beyond or temporarily sets aside his own doxastic commitments in order to give a fair and impartial hearing to the intellectual opposition".[1] Jack Kwong's definition sees open-mindedness as the "willingness to take a novel viewpoint seriously".[2]

According to Wayne Riggs, open-mindedness springs from an awareness of the inherent fallibility of one's beliefs; hence, open-minded individuals are more inclined to listen to, and seriously consider, alternative viewpoints.[3]

There are various scales for the measurement of open-mindedness.[4] Harding and Hare argued that schools should emphasize open-mindedness more than relativism in their science instruction, because the scientific community does not embrace a relativistic way of thinking.[5]

Among other things, involves an open-minded outlook with respect to one's beliefs.[6]

Open-mindedness is generally considered an important personal attribute for effective participation in management teams and other groups. Open-mindedness is usually encouraged in group settings, within different cultures and new environments.[7]

According to David DiSalvo, closed-mindedness, or an unwillingness to consider new ideas, can result from the brain's natural dislike for ambiguity. According to this view, the brain has a "search and destroy" relationship with ambiguity and evidence contradictory to people's current beliefs tends to make them uncomfortable by introducing such ambiguity.[8] Research confirms that belief-discrepant-closed-minded persons have less tolerance for cognitive inconsistency.[9]

Virtues contrasting with open-mindedness include steadfastness, loyalty, and fundamentalism.

Open-mindedness in American political parties

Democrats and Republicans differ in how they describe themselves in 2024, according to a Pew poll. Three-fourths (75%) of Democrats describing themselves as open minded compared to half (54%) of Republicans while 44% of Republicans are skeptical of what experts say compared to 17% of Democrats. Additionally 71% of Republicans describe themselves as “respectful of authority” compared to 61% of Democrats with 58% of Republicans describing themselves as traditional while only 19% of Democrats describing that way.[10] Of liberal Democrats, 87% of them describe themselves as open minded compared to 49% who identify as conservatives while 51% of conservatives being skeptical of experts compared to 14% of liberal Democrats.[11]

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Baehr. Jason. 2011. The Structure of Open-Mindedness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 41. 2. 191–213. 10.1353/cjp.2011.0010. 55516406.
  2. Kwong. Jack M.C.. 2015. Open-Mindedness as a Critical Virtue. Topio. 35. 2. 403–411. 10.1007/s11245-015-9317-4. 10757787.
  3. Riggs. Wayne. 2010. Open-mindedness. Metaphilosophy. 41. 1–2. 172–188. 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01625.x. 240236568.
  4. A revised scale for the measurement of open-mindedness. Speech Monographs. Haiman. Franklyn S.. 97–102. 31. 2. 2009. 10.1080/03637756409375396.
  5. Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Open-Mindedness Rather Than Relativism. Patricia . Harding . William . Hare. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<225::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-G. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37. 3. 225–236. 2000. 2000JRScT..37..225H.
  6. Web site: Bertrand Russell on Critical Thinking . Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Boston, Mass.. Hare. William. 1998.
  7. California Management Review. The Top Management Team: Key to Strategic Success . 1987. 30. 1. 88–108. Hambrick. Donald C.. Donald C. Hambrick. 41165268. 10.2307/41165268 . 155702534 .
  8. Book: DiSalvo, David. What Makes Your Brain Happy and Why You Should Do the Opposite. Prometheus Books. 2011. 978-1-61614-483-8.
  9. Open- and closed-mindedness, belief-discrepant communication behavior, and tolerance for cognitive inconsistency. Hunt. Martin F. Jr. . Miller. Gerald R. . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 8. 1. 1968. 35–37. 10.1037/h0021238. 5638020.
  10. Web site: Daniller . Shanay Gracia and Andrew . 2024-08-29 . Republicans and Democrats differ in how they describe themselves . 2025-11-08 . Pew Research Center . en-US.
  11. Web site: Daniller . Shanay Gracia and Andrew . 2024-08-29 . Liberal Democrats are particularly likely to describe themselves as open-minded, while conservative Republicans stand out for their skepticism of experts . 2025-11-08 . Pew Research Center . en-US.