Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Peter Maas wrote:
>>>> Did you try using an old-style class instead of a new-style class?
>>>> The original program has an old style class, changing it to a new
>> style class increases run time by 25% (version is 2.4.3 btw).
>> Ah yes. Years ago when I first saw this test it was still using new-style
> classes.
>> Anyway, this is a bug on its own I believe. I don't think new-style
> classes are meant to be 25% slower than old-style classes. Can any guru
> clarify this?
Please try 2.5 - there's been significant optimisation work put into 2.5
Richard
