Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>rurpy at yahoo.com wrote:
>> > But, I am still completely at a loss why you, he, or anyone,
> > based on the information presented so far,.would conclude
> > that the python security problem is unrelated.
>> Because he's read the security advisory, perhaps, and understands what
> it says?
Then perhaps you or he could explain it to us less intelligent
people in very simple terms?