Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" wrote:
>>>>>if you want better support for more precise hooking, post some examples.
>>>>I want a design-time environment to hook up my objects in a visual way.
>>I think it is easier than doing it manually, even in Python.
>>> what objects? what hooks? visually, in what way?
>>>>>>All you are saying is that you don't have a need for this, but perhaps others do.
>>>>>>handwavy references to what "other may need" is another thing you should
>>>avoid if you want your Python change proposal to be successful.
>>>>I did not say what "others may need".
>>> I'm not sure I see the big difference between "perhaps others do [have a need]"
> and "others may need", but that's me.
>He's wriggling anyway, as his opening post said (among other things) "I
believe that Python should have a common components model for all RAD
development environments ...". So unless he's the only person who's
going to use these development environments it does indeed sound a
little prescriptive.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
