Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2006-10-19, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
>>>James Stroud wrote:
>>>>>>>without requiring an iterator
>>>>can we perhaps invent some more arbitrary constraints while
>>we're at it?
>>> No letter G. I don't like them. They wet their nests.
>
The requirement for an iterator is the constraint. Removin the
requirement for the iterator removes the constraint. Or is the iterator
the convenience?
James
--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA 90095
http://www.jamesstroud.com/