Peter Decker wrote:
> When you've worked with lots of open
> source projects, you can tell which are actively being developed and
> which are dead or comatose; you can tell which have a growing
> community and which are stagnant; you can tell which are worth
> investing your time into learning and/or contributing to, and which
> are dead-ends. Wax feels like a real dead-end to me.
Can you also tell when you're wrong?
I checked out Wax last week for the first time; I hit a snag and got an
answer from the lead developer within a day, along with a pointer to
the latest dev version.
But don't let communication get in the way of that six sense you've got
going there :)
- alex23
