Antoon Pardon wrote:
> On 2006-10-07, John Machin <sjmachin at lexicon.net> wrote:
>>>Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>>>>On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:29:34 -0700, John Machin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>MonkeeSage wrote:
>>>>>>>>>On Oct 6, 8:02 pm, "MonkeeSage" <MonkeeS... at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>it is clearer to you to make the condition explicit ("blah not False"),
>>>>>>>>>>"blah not False" -> "blah is False"
>>>>>>>>Whichever way your team wants to interpret it, d00d.
>>>>>>>>Please consider whether you should be writing "(blah is False) is
>>>>True", that would be more explicit.
>>>>>>Puh-lease! Get it right!
>>>>>>It should be "((blah is False) is True) is True".
>>>>Yes, but it stops after one more iteration. "What I tell you three
>>times is true" -- the Bellman, "The Hunting of the Snark", by Lewis
>>Carroll.
>>> Shouldn't it then be: "((blah is False) is False) is False"
>No, that would be
"((blah is True) is False) is True"
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
