MonkeeSage wrote:
>> but "let's hypergeneralize and treat sequences and mappings as the same
>> thing" proposals are nothing new; a trip to the archives might be help-
>> ful.
>> Huh? I don't want to treat sequences and mappings as the same thing.
> I'm talking about adding two similar convenience methods for sequences
> as already exist for mappings.
so what makes you think you're the first one who's ever talked about that?
</F>
