Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> James Stroud wrote:
>> > without requiring an iterator
>> can we perhaps invent some more arbitrary constraints while we're at it?
>> </F>
>
Why does it seem to me that you are confusing convienience with
constraint, or are the two equivalent?
James
--
James Stroud
UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics
Box 951570
Los Angeles, CA 90095
http://www.jamesstroud.com/