"Bruno Desthuilliers" <onurb at xiludom.gro> wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
> > Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> >
> >> Just for the record : Ruby's code-blocks (closures, really) come from
> >> Smalltalk, which is still the OneTrueObjectLanguage(tm).
> >
> > IsTheOneTrueObjectLanguage(tm)ReallyCamelCased?
> >
> ThatsAGoodQuestion.
>>DoYouMeanIsTheIdentifierTheOneTrueObjectLanguage(tm)CamelCasedOrIsTheObjectObjec
tBoundToIdentifierTheOneTrueObjectLanguage(tm)CamelCasedOrYetSomethingElse?
IAmGladToSeeThisSterlingAttemptAtMinimisingTheEncodingSpaceAsTheSpaceCharacterNe
verImpartedAnyInformationAnywayHendrik