Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" wrote:
>>> A RAD IDE tool to hook up components into an application or library (
>> module in Python ) has nothing to do with terseness and everything to do
>> with ease of programming.
>> python already has excellent and ridiculously easy-to-program ways to hook
> things up. after all, hooking things up is what python programmers tend to do,
> most of their time.
I agree.
>> if you want better support for more precise hooking, post some examples.
I want a design-time environment to hook up my objects in a visual way.
I think it is easier than doing it manually, even in Python.
>>> All you are saying is that you don't have a need for this, but perhaps others do.
>> handwavy references to what "other may need" is another thing you should
> avoid if you want your Python change proposal to be successful.
I did not say what "others may need".
