Richard Brodie wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" <eldiener_no_spam_here at earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:WvMWg.12223$UG4.9358 at newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...>>> "Thinking in Java or C++" as opposed to Python does not mean anything to me as a general
>> statement. I am well aware of the difference between statically and dynamically typed
>> languages but why this should have anything to do with RAD programming is beyond me. Do
>> you care to elucidate this distinction ?
>> I think this blog entry http://osteele.com/archives/2004/11/ides> provides some insight into the point of view expressed.
I think that one can easily be both, someone who is good at using a
language and someone who is good at using a visual tool. The dichotomy
presented in the article exists only for a small number of people.
