"...we should pass over all biographies of 'the good and the great,' while we search carefully the slight records of wretches who died in prison, in Bedlam, or upon the gallows."
~Edgar Allan Poe

Friday, September 11, 2026

Weekend Link Dump

 



Welcome to the Link Dump, where our host for this week will be British composer Daphne Oram's cat!  She had four cats, Elect, Tronic, Sine and Square.  I don't know which one this is, but he is very welcome.


When reference librarians were Google.

Bigfoot?  Or fat guy skinny-dipping?  The world wonders!

The patterns of near-death experiences.

The (former) Versailles of the West Indies.

A husband and wife stand trial for murder.

Stone Age hunters were pretty good sailors.  (As a side note, I've often thought that ancient humans would have been justly offended to learn that we think of them as "primitive.")

This is for all of you who have been wondering how the largest known T. rex died.

The trousers of Old Mexico.

"The Devil made me do it!"

In defense of palmistry.

Recipes from Victory Gardens.

Charles James Fox and the heiress.

Parliament, Clangers, and Bagpuss.

What it was like to sell second-hand tombstones.

Ah-hoo, werewolves of...Detroit?

The last of the Neanderthals.

The possible dangers of meditation.

The 1381 Peasants' Revolt.

The mystery of why male chimps spend years throwing rocks at the same tree.

In this week's episode of "rewriting human history..."

The long journey of a "magical" manuscript.

How the United States got its name.

When amusement parks turn deadly.

That's a wrap for this week!  See you on Monday, when we'll look at a particularly weird extraterrestrial encounter.  In the meantime, here's Jackson Browne.

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Newspaper Clipping of the Day

Via Newspapers.com



Calvin is among the literary cats who have been immortalized in prose.  Originally part of the household of Harriet Beecher Stowe, Calvin eventually made his home with author Charles Dudley Warner.  After the cat died, Warner wrote the following biographical essay, which was often republished in various late 19th century newspapers and periodicals.  This particular printing comes from the New Orleans “Times-Picayune,” June 2, 1877.  I wanted to share it as a charming tribute to a cat who was obviously much-loved.

Calvin is dead. His life, long to him, but short for the rest of us, was not marked by startling adventures, but his character was so uncommon and his qualities were so worthy of imitation, that I have been asked by those who personally knew him to set down my recollections of his career.

His origin and ancestry were shrouded in mystery; even his age was a matter of pure conjecture. Although he was of the Maltese race, I have reason to suppose that he was American by birth as he certainly was in sympathy. Calvin was given to me eight years ago by Mrs. Stowe, but she knew nothing of his age or origin. He walked into her house one day out of the great unknown and became at once at home, as if he had been always a friend of the family. He appeared to have artistic and literary tastes, and it was as if he had inquired at the door if that was the residence of the author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and, upon being assured that it was, had decided to dwell there. This is, of course, fanciful, for his antecedents were wholly unknown, but in his time he could hardly have been in any household where he would not have heard Uncle Tom’s Cabin talked about. When he came to Mrs. Stowe, he was as large as he ever was, and apparently as old as he ever became. Yet there was in him no appearance of age; he was in the happy maturity of all his powers, and you would rather have said that in that maturity he had found the secret of perpetual youth. And it was as difficult to believe that he would ever be aged as it was to imagine that he had ever been in immature youth. There was in him a mysterious perpetuity.

After some years, when Mrs. Stowe made her winter home in Florida, Calvin came to live with us. From the first moment, he fell into the ways of the house and assumed a recognized position in the family,—I say recognized, because after he became known he was always inquired for by visitors, and in the letters to the other members of the family he always received a message. Although the least obtrusive of beings, his individuality always made itself felt.

His personal appearance had much to do with this, for he was of royal mould, and had an air of high breeding. He was large, but he had nothing of the fat grossness of the celebrated Angora family; though powerful, he was exquisitely proportioned, and as graceful in every movement as a young leopard. When he stood up to open a door—he opened all the doors with old-fashioned latches—he was portentously tall, and when stretched on the rug before the fire he seemed too long for this world—as indeed he was. His coat was the finest and softest I have ever seen, a shade of quiet Maltese; and from his throat downward, underneath, to the white tips of his feet, he wore the whitest and most delicate ermine; and no person was ever more fastidiously neat. In his finely formed head you saw something of his aristocratic character; the ears were small and cleanly cut, there was a tinge of pink in the nostrils, his face was handsome, and the expression of his countenance exceedingly intelligent—I should call it even a sweet expression if the term were not inconsistent with his look of alertness and sagacity.

It is difficult to convey a just idea of his gayety in connection with his dignity and gravity, which his name expressed. As we know nothing of his family, of course it will be understood that Calvin was his Christian name. He had times of relaxation into utter playfulness, delighting in a ball of yarn, catching sportively at stray ribbons when his mistress was at her toilet, and pursuing his own tail, with hilarity, for lack of anything better. He could amuse himself by the hour, and he did not care for children; perhaps something in his past was present to his memory. He had absolutely no bad habits, and his disposition was perfect. I never saw him exactly angry, though I have seen his tail grow to an enormous size when a strange cat appeared upon his lawn. He disliked cats, evidently regarding them as feline and treacherous, and he had no association with them. Occasionally there would be heard a night concert in the shrubbery. Calvin would ask to have the door opened, and then you would hear a rush and a “pestzt,” and the concert would explode, and Calvin would quietly come in and resume his seat on the hearth. There was no trace of anger in his manner, but he wouldn’t have any of that about the house. He had the rare virtue of magnanimity. Although he had fixed notions about his own rights, and extraordinary persistency in getting them, he never showed temper at a repulse; he simply and firmly persisted till he had what he wanted. His diet was one point; his idea was that of the scholars about dictionaries,—to “get the best.” He knew as well as anyone what was in the house, and would refuse beef if turkey was to be had; and if there were oysters, he would wait over the turkey to see if the oysters would not be forthcoming. And yet he was not a gross gourmand; he would eat bread if he saw me eating it, and thought he was not being imposed on. His habits of feeding, also, were refined; he never used a knife, and he would put up his hand and draw the fork down to his mouth as gracefully as a grown person. Unless necessity compelled, he would not eat in the kitchen, but insisted upon his meals in the dining-room, and would wait patiently, unless a stranger were present; and then he was sure to importune the visitor, hoping that the latter was ignorant of the rule of the house, and would give him something. They used to say that he preferred as his table-cloth on the floor a certain well-known church journal; but this was said by an Episcopalian. So far as I know, he had no religious prejudices, except that he did not like the association with Romanists. He tolerated the servants, because they belonged to the house, and would sometimes linger by the kitchen stove; but the moment visitors came in he arose, opened the door, and marched into the drawing-room. Yet he enjoyed the company of his equals, and never withdrew, no matter how many callers—whom he recognized as of his society—might come into the drawing-room. Calvin was fond of company, but he wanted to choose it; and I have no doubt that his was an aristocratic fastidiousness rather than one of faith. It is so with most people.

The intelligence of Calvin was something phenomenal, in his rank of life. He established a method of communicating his wants, and even some of his sentiments; and he could help himself in many things. There was a furnace register in a retired room, where he used to go when he wished to be alone, that he always opened when he desired more heat; but never shut it, any more than he shut the door after himself; He could do almost everything but speak; and you would declare sometimes that you could see a pathetic longing to do that in his intelligent face. I have no desire to overdraw his qualities, but if there was one thing in him more noticeable than another, it was his fondness for nature. He could content himself for hours at a low window, looking into the ravine and at the great trees, noting the smallest stir there; he delighted, above all things, to accompany me walking about the garden, hearing the birds, getting the smell of the fresh earth, and rejoicing in the sunshine. He followed me and gamboled like a dog, rolling over on the turf and exhibiting his delight in a hundred ways. If I worked, he sat and watched me, or looked off over the bank, and kept his ear open to the twitter in the cherry-trees. When it stormed, he was sure to sit at the window, keenly watching the rain or the snow, glancing up and down at its falling; and a winter tempest always delighted him. I think he was genuinely fond of birds, but, so far as I know, he usually confined himself to one a day; he never killed, as some sportsmen do, for the sake of killing, but only as civilized people do,—from necessity. He was intimate with the flying-squirrels who dwell in the chestnut-trees,—too intimate, for almost every day in the summer he would bring in one, until he nearly discouraged them. He was, indeed, a superb hunter, and would have been a devastating one, if his bump of destructiveness had not been offset by a bump of moderation. There was very little of the brutality of the lower animals about him; I don’t think he enjoyed rats for themselves, but he knew his business, and for the first few months of his residence with us he waged an awful campaign against the horde, and after that his simple presence was sufficient to deter them from coming on the premises. Mice amused him, but he usually considered them too small game to be taken seriously; I have seen him play for an hour with a mouse, and then let him go with a royal condescension. In this whole matter of “getting a living,” Calvin was a great contrast to the rapacity of the age in which he lived.

I hesitate a little to speak of his capacity for friendship and the affectionateness of his nature, for I know from his own reserve that he would not care to have it much talked about. We understood each other perfectly, but we never made any fuss about it; when I spoke his name and snapped my fingers, he came to me; when I returned home at night, he was pretty sure to be waiting for me near the gate, and would rise and saunter along the walk, as if his being there were purely accidental,—so shy was he commonly of showing feeling; and when I opened the door he never rushed in, like a cat, but loitered, and lounged, as if he had had no intention of going in, but would condescend to. And yet, the fact was, he knew dinner was ready, and he was bound to be there. He kept the run of dinnertime. It happened sometimes, during our absence in the summer, that dinner would be early, and Calvin, walking about the grounds, missed it and came in late. But he never made a mistake the second day. There was one thing he never did,—he never rushed through an open doorway. He never forgot his dignity. If he had asked to have the door opened, and was eager to go out, he always went deliberately; I can see him now, standing on the sill, looking about at the sky as if he was thinking whether it were worth while to take an umbrella, until he was near having his tail shut in.

His friendship was rather constant than demonstrative. When we returned from an absence of nearly two years, Calvin welcomed us with evident pleasure, but showed his satisfaction rather by tranquil happiness than by fuming about. He had the faculty of making us glad to get home. It was his constancy that was so attractive. He liked companionship, but he wouldn’t be petted, or fussed over, or sit in anyone’s lap a moment; he always extricated himself from such familiarity with dignity and with no show of temper. If there was any petting to be done, however, he chose to do it. Often he would sit looking at me, and then, moved by a delicate affection, come and pull at my coat and sleeve until he could touch my face with his nose, and then go away contented. He had a habit of coming to my study in the morning, sitting quietly by my side or on the table for hours, watching the pen run over the paper, occasionally swinging his tail round for a blotter, and then going to sleep among the papers by the inkstand. Or, more rarely, he would watch the writing from a perch on my shoulder. Writing always interested him, and, until he understood it, he wanted to hold the pen.

He always held himself in a kind of reserve with his friend, as if he had said, “Let us respect our personality, and not make a ‘mess’ of friendship.” He saw, with Emerson, the risk of degrading it to trivial conveniency. “Why insist on rash personal relations with your friend?” “Leave this touching and clawing.” Yet I would not give an unfair notion of his aloofness, his fine sense of the sacredness of the me and the not-me. And, at the risk of not being believed, I will relate an incident, which was often repeated. Calvin had the practice of passing a portion of the night in the contemplation of its beauties, and would come into our chamber over the roof of the conservatory through the open window, summer and winter, and go to sleep on the foot of my bed. He would do this always exactly in this way; he never was content to stay in the chamber if we compelled him to go upstairs and through the door. He had the obstinacy of General Grant. But this is by the way. In the morning, he performed his toilet and went down to breakfast with the rest of the family. Now, when the mistress was absent from home, and at no other time, Calvin would come in the morning, when the bell rang, to the head of the bed, put up his feet and look into my face, follow me about when I rose, “assist” at the dressing, and in many purring ways show his fondness, as if he had plainly said, “I know that she has gone away, but I am here.” Such was Calvin in rare moments.

He had his limitations. Whatever passion he had for nature, he had no conception of art. There was sent to him once a fine and very expressive cat’s head in bronze, by Frémiet. I placed it on the floor. He regarded it intently, approached it cautiously and crouchingly, touched it with his nose, perceived the fraud, turned away abruptly, and never would notice it afterward. On the whole, his life was not only a successful one, but a happy one. He never had but one fear, so far as I know: he had a mortal and a reasonable terror of plumbers. He would never stay in the house when they were here. No coaxing could quiet him. Of course he didn’t share our fear about their charges, but he must have had some dreadful experience with them in that portion of his life which is unknown to us. A plumber was to him the devil, and I have no doubt that, in his scheme, plumbers were foreordained to do him mischief.

In speaking of his worth, it has never occurred to me to estimate Calvin by the worldly standard. I know that it is customary now, when anyone dies, to ask how much he was worth, and that no obituary in the newspapers is considered complete without such an estimate. The plumbers in our house were one day overheard to say that, “They say that she says that he says that he wouldn’t take a hundred dollars for him.” It is unnecessary to say that I never made such a remark, and that, so far as Calvin was concerned, there was no purchase in money.

As I look back upon it, Calvin’s life seems to me a fortunate one, for it was natural and unforced. He ate when he was hungry, slept when he was sleepy, and enjoyed existence to the very tips of his toes and the end of his expressive and slow-moving tail. He delighted to roam about the garden, and stroll among the trees, and to lie on the green grass and luxuriate in all the sweet influences of summer. You could never accuse him of idleness, and yet he knew the secret of repose. The poet who wrote so prettily of him that his little life was rounded with a sleep, understated his felicity; it was rounded with a good many. His conscience never seemed to interfere with his slumbers. In fact, he had good habits and a contented mind. I can see him now walk in at the study door, sit down by my chair, bring his tail artistically about his feet, and look up at me with unspeakable happiness in his handsome face. I often thought that he felt the dumb limitation which denied him the power of language. But since he was denied speech, he scorned the inarticulate mouthings of the lower animals. The vulgar mewing and yowling of the cat species was beneath him; he sometimes uttered a sort of articulate and well-bred ejaculation, when he wished to call attention to something that he considered remarkable, or to some want of his, but he never went whining about. He would sit for hours at a closed window, when he desired to enter, without a murmur, and when it was opened be never admitted that he had been impatient by “bolting” in. Though speech he had not, and the unpleasant kind of utterance given to his race he would not use, he had a mighty power of purr to express his measureless content with congenial society. There was in him a musical organ with stops of varied power and expression, upon which I have no doubt he could have performed Scarlatti’s celebrated cat’s-fugue.

Whether Calvin died of old age, or was carried off by one of the diseases incident to youth, it is impossible to say; for his departure was as quiet as his advent was mysterious. I only know that he appeared to us in this world in his perfect stature and beauty, and that after a time, like Lohengrin, he withdrew. In his illness there was nothing more to be regretted than in all his blameless life. I suppose there never was an illness that had more of dignity and sweetness and resignation in it. It came on gradually, in a kind of listlessness and want of appetite. An alarming symptom was his preference for the warmth of a furnace-register to the lively sparkle of the open wood-fire. Whatever pain he suffered, he bore it in silence, and seemed only anxious not to obtrude his malady. We tempted him with the delicacies of the season, but it soon became impossible for him to eat, and for two weeks he ate or drank scarcely anything. Sometimes he made an effort to take something, but it was evident that he made the effort to please us. The neighbors—and I am convinced that the advice of neighbors is never good for anything—suggested catnip. He wouldn’t even smell it. We had the attendance of an amateur practitioner of medicine, whose real office was the cure of souls, but nothing touched his case. He took what was offered, but it was with the air of one to whom the time for pellets was passed. He sat or lay day after day almost motionless, never once making a display of those vulgar convulsions or contortions of pain which are so disagreeable to society. His favorite place was on the brightest spot of a Smyrna rug by the conservatory, where the sunlight fell and he could hear the fountain play. If we went to him and exhibited our interest in his condition, he always purred in recognition of our sympathy. And when I spoke his name, he looked up with an expression that said, “I understand it, old fellow, but it’s no use.” He was to all who came to visit him a model of calmness and patience in affliction.

I was absent from home at the last, but heard by daily postal-card of his failing condition; and never again saw him alive. One sunny morning, he rose from his rug, went into the conservatory (he was very thin then), walked around it deliberately, looking at all the plants he knew, and then went to the bay-window in the dining-room, and stood a long time looking out upon the little field, now brown and sere, and toward the garden, where perhaps the happiest hours of his life had been spent. It was a last look. He turned and walked away, laid himself down upon the bright spot in the rug, and quietly died.

It is not too much to say that a little shock went through the neighborhood when it was known that Calvin was dead, so marked was his individuality; and his friends, one after another, came in to see him. There was no sentimental nonsense about his obsequies; it was felt that any parade would have been distasteful to him. John, who acted as undertaker, prepared a candle-box for him, and I believe assumed a professional decorum; but there may have been the usual levity underneath, for I heard that he remarked in the kitchen that it was the “dryest wake he ever attended.” Everybody, however, felt a fondness for Calvin, and regarded him with a certain respect. Between him and Bertha there existed a great friendship, and she apprehended his nature; she used to say that sometimes she was afraid of him, he looked at her so intelligently; she was never certain that he was what he appeared to be.

When I returned, they had laid Calvin on a table in an upper chamber by an open window. It was February. He reposed in a candle-box, lined about the edge with evergreen, and at his head stood a little wine-glass with flowers. He lay with his head tucked down in his arms,—a favorite position of his before the fire,—as if asleep in the comfort of his soft and exquisite fur. It was the involuntary exclamation of those who saw him, “How natural he looks!” As for myself, I said nothing. John buried him under the twin hawthorn-trees,—one white and the other pink,—in a spot where Calvin was fond of lying and listening to the hum of summer insects and the twitter of birds.

Perhaps I have failed to make appear the individuality of character that was so evident to those who knew him. At any rate, I have set down nothing concerning him but the literal truth. He was always a mystery. I did not know whence he came; I do not know whither he has gone. I would not weave one spray of falsehood in the wreath I lay upon his grave.

Monday, September 7, 2026

Strange Days at the Lamb Inn




The Lamb Inn was a large, comfortable establishment in Bristol, England, with a long history, from the mid-17th century until it was demolished in 1910,  Over the centuries, the inn undoubtedly saw many strange and interesting things, but undoubtedly its most famous episode began in late 1761, when all hell broke loose at the hostel.  And, yes, I am speaking quite literally.

Richard Giles had been running the Lamb Inn since the 1740s.  Aside from the inn, he also earned a living as a carrier--that is to say, he ran wagons back and forth from London.  Giles lived there with his wife, eight children, and several servants in perfect peace until the early morning of November 13, 1761.  (A Friday, for those of you who are superstitious.)  The two Giles daughters, thirteen year old Molly, and Dobby, aged eight, were still in bed when they were awakened by the unnerving sound of loud scratching at their bedroom window.  As the girls cowered under the blankets, the scratching sound seemed to travel to their beds.  Now thoroughly scared, they ran to tell their parents.  When Richard inspected the bedroom, he did not hear or see anything.  He shrugged and told his daughters that they had undoubtedly just heard pigeons on the roof.

Quiet resumed until December 6, when the scratching started up anew, this time accompanied by knocking noises.  The cacophony became a daily occurrence.  One day, while Richard was inspecting the bedroom, he not only heard the scratches and knocks, but saw a wooden clothing box start rocking violently.  It then fell over, emptying the clothes on the floor.

Molly and Dobby were moved to another bedroom, which seemed to only make things worse.  Whatever entity was making the noises now turned to physically harming the girls, biting them and sticking pins into their arms.  Various items of furniture were thrown around their room.

Inevitably, news of the sinister haunting spread through the city.  A chemist named Henry Durbin, desiring to play amateur ghost-hunter, got permission to spend the night in the girls’ bedroom.  The spirits put on quite a show for him.  A glass drifted across the room, smashing itself into a wall.  Molly’s nightcap was snatched from her head by an invisible force which “beat a tattoo on her with the skill of a drummer.”  Furniture and chamber pots were hurled about.  The curtains moved up and down.  Phantom voices murmured ominously.  It was all, Henry wrote, “contrary to the course of nature.”

The spirits--or whatever you care to call what was visiting the inn--then took to kidnapping Dobby.  One day, she disappeared, only to be found under her bed, pinned there by some unseen force keeping her from moving, or even calling for help.  She said that “a woman in a ragged dress, a brown chip hat and great holes in her stockings” had forced her there.

More outsiders came to inspect the house, which was now universally regarded as being haunted by some evil being.  They were greeted with an eerie squealing noise.  Questions were asked of the invisible presence, who answered by tapping out letters.  The spirit blamed its presence on a witch in nearby Mangotsfield, who had been hired by a business rival of Richard Giles to curse him and his carrier business.  The spirit appeared to be proven correct when one of Giles’ wagons became so badly stuck on a road that eighteen horses were needed to move it.  The following day, the same thing happened to another wagon.

Bristol’s clergymen were called in to try to exorcise the spirit.  This did absolutely nothing to rid the household of its presence, but these men of God were impressed by the entity’s ability to answer their questions in Greek, Latin, and Hebrew, so there’s that.

On one occasion, the two girls were levitated out of their beds towards the ceiling.  The combined strength of three men were unable to stop it.  Molly was finally moved to one of Giles’ other homes, but the entity mockingly followed her there.

One day, Giles was traveling in one of his wagons when the harness on the gig suddenly and mysteriously broke, throwing him into the road.  He later said that at the time of the accident, he saw the apparition of a woman standing by the side of the road.  By the time he picked himself off the ground, she had vanished.

Soon afterwards, Henry Durbin was informed by a Mr. Jennings that he--Jennings--had heard voices mentioning the uproar at the Lamb Inn, and threatening him, as well.  The voices said that the spirit’s control over the Giles girls was weakening, but its power over “the old one” was increasing.  On Durbin’s next visit to the Lamb Inn, he found that Richard Giles was seriously ill from some ailment his doctor couldn’t identify, and was powerless to treat.  Giles died three days later, on May 16, 1762.

This tragic event only intensified Durbin’s desire to investigate whatever it was that insisted on plaguing the Giles family.  The spirit had once told him that its name was “Malchi.”  Durbin consulted with a local “white witch” about “Malchi.”  She told him that the entity was the head of the “familiar spirits,” knowing all human languages and knowledge.  “There are some learned spirits and some ignorant.”

On a more practical level, the “witch” gave him a recipe for banishing Malchi.  It involved emptying the Giles girls’ chamber pots into a pipkin (an earthenware cooking pot) and placing it on a fire, after which, “beautiful colours came out of it like a rainbow.”  Chamber pot soup sounds like the sort of thing which would get rid of anybody, and, sure enough, by December 1762, Malchi had departed the Lamb Inn, for good.

Friday, September 4, 2026

Weekend Link Dump

 



Welcome to this week's Link Dump!

Meanwhile, the Strange Company HQ staffers are hoping to make the 2028 U.S. Olympics gymnastics team.



Navigating the Pacific, ancient Polynesian style.

How to make a medieval king fall in love with you.  Although, considering what most medieval kings were like, I'm not sure that you'd want this.

A murder that was "solved," but remains unresolved.

The "Oz factor."

Some writing systems that will probably never be deciphered.

UFOs and "missing time."

A non-Good Samaritan at sea.

An undertaker provides a parade float.

We now know when Vikings reached North America.

Elite suburban villas as a center of 18th century politics.

What (possibly) destroyed the Library of Alexandria.

A Canadian island that just won't sit still.

Nothing to see here, just golden-haired, bare-skinned aliens.

Clever Hans, the psychic horse.

Things we still don't know about ancient Egypt.

A weird family tragedy.

The diary of a food-loving Renaissance adolescent.

The time when Edgar Allan Poe tried to get a government job, and things went sideways very quickly.

Victorian Paris' "Temple of Money."

A string of murders in Oregon.

Josephine Baker, Resistance spy.

The last of the Spitalfields Market Cats.

A bizarre "runaway nun" story.

A heroic Great Dane in WWII.

A mysterious murder on a shanty-boat.

17th century villagers were terrified of the occupant of this grave.  So naturally, archaeologists had to dig her up.  Stupid archaeologists.

The life and career of Aphra Behn.

That eternal search for the Abominable Snowman.

The latest in Biblical archaeology.

Why we say "o'clock."

Alan Turing and "jump jets."

How we got the word, "weird."

The hairstyles of ancient Egypt.

That's all for this week!  See you on Monday, when we'll meet a poltergeist named Malchi.  In the meantime, here's some Telemann.

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Newspaper Clipping of the Day

Via Newspapers.com



File this one under “Life’s random little oddities.”  The “Miller County Vidette,” May 6, 1875:

A correspondent of the Toledo Blade, writing from Hastings, Michigan, says:

About ten miles south of this place, a farmer, while driving some cows through a deep forest adjoining his fields, unexpectedly came upon an unusually large buck, stretched out upon the ground, and moaning away the last moments of its existence. The animal was evidently very old, and in a sadly emaciated condition, so the fact that the farmer immediately put a bullet through its head should rather be looked upon as an act of compassion than otherwise. Just as he was about to leave he observed a round lump upon the animal's side, which so attracted his attention that he stopped to examine it. Quickly discovering that close under the skin was deposited a round, hard body, he used his knife and brought to light a silver bullet, such as was used in olden times for the inclosure of secret dispatches.

He carried this curiosity to his house, where, after considerable trouble, he succeeded in opening it, and found to his great surprise that it contained a message written in cypher upon paper attenuated to a high degree. Otherwise than that the paper was slightly discolored, not sufficiently, however, to obliterate the characters. Neither the bullet nor what it inclosed bore any evidence of its late surroundings or of the strange vicissitudes through which it might previously have gone. Several men of science have carefully inspected this relic of the past, and are as much at loss to decipher the message as they are to satisfactorily explain when and how the bullet came to be lodged in the side of the buck.

Monday, August 31, 2026

In Which Senator Sharon Makes Some Poor Romantic Decisions

Sarah Althea Hill



That old, old story:  “Boy meets girl, boy loves girl, boy dumps girl.”  Whenever I encounter it, I usually shrug and move on.  However, present me with a sequel that says, “Girl takes boy to court, practices voodoo curses, with everything ending in a shootout,” and I start to take an interest in the situation.

During the 1860s, William Sharon was lucky enough to make a tidy fortune from Virginia City, Nevada, silver mines, wealth that he augmented through shrewd investments in California and Nevada railroads and real estate.  Before too many years had passed, Sharon was a multimillionaire.  In 1875, he was elected to the U.S. Senate.  On a darker note, in that same year, Sharon’s business partner William C. Ralston was found floating in the bay off the coast of San Francisco.  Ralston had recently suffered catastrophic business losses, which led his death to be ruled a suicide.

Soon after this tragedy, Sharon moved to San Francisco, taking a suite in the Palace Hotel which he had co-owned with Ralston.  By this point, Sharon felt he had enough money to ignore business and devote himself to pleasure.  The personable widower became one of the city’s most notorious womanizers and general men-about-town.

William Sharon


At some point in his social whirl, Sharon met Sarah Althea Hill, a beautiful Southern socialite.  Although she had inherited a handsome fortune from her rich father, it did not take her long to squander it on San Francisco’s many opportunities to enjoy the high life.  When a pretty, pleasure-loving woman in need of cash meets an older, stinking rich man with an eye for the ladies, it is not hard to guess what usually happens next.  Sarah soon became Senator Sharon’s maîtresse-en-titre.  Sarah was gifted with luxurious clothes, exquisite jewelry, and access to the most elite circles in California.  Sharon often introduced her to acquaintances as “my little wife.”

This last habit of Sharon’s was to get him into a good deal of trouble.  After three years together, Sarah found out that Sharon was cheating on her, and indignantly filed for divorce.  How could she do that if they were not married, you ask?  It’s simple:  Sarah presented the court with a handwritten marriage contract, dated August 25, 1880, that she claimed Sharon had dictated to her.  Although the bulk of the document was in her handwriting, Sharon’s signature was at the bottom.  She also produced a number of letters Sharon had written to her where he addressed her as “My Dear Wife.”  Sharon countered with the claim that the letters and his signature on the marriage contract were all forgeries, and the lawyers were off to the races.

The “Sharon v. Hill” trial opened in 1884.  Sordid brawls between wealthy and glamorous elites are always catnip for the public, and the newspapers had an excellent time giving readers every embarrassing detail about the legal battles between the former lovers.  The courtroom arguments went on for years.  Sharon’s lawyers declared that not only had Sarah forged all the relevant papers, but her whole story about their irregular “marriage” was a giant fantasy.  Unfortunately for the Senator, Sarah was able to present a parade of witnesses testifying that on numerous occasions, he had referred to her as “Mrs. Sharon.”

Despite the fact that Sarah had a plausible case, she had a hard time finding lawyers willing to fight a wealthy and influential man.  Enter David S. Terry, an attorney bold--or, perhaps, insane--enough to do just that.

David Terry


Terry, a former justice of the California Supreme Court, was, to put it most politely, not a man who feared trouble.  In 1856, he stabbed a member of a vigilante group.  Even more notoriously, in 1859 he fought a duel with California Senator David Broderick over the issue of slavery.  Terry had wanted the state’s Southern Democrats to be allowed to own slaves, while Broderick advocated for California to remain antislavery.  The two men were so bitterly opposed on the issue that they finally resorted to pistols at dawn.  The duel left Broderick fatally wounded.  Many believed that his pistol had been secretly disabled in order for Terry to win an unfair fight.  Ironically for Terry and his pro-slavery allies, the public wrath over the allegedly rigged duel did much to ensure that California remained a free state.

Terry won the case for Sarah.  Although their relations had started as strictly attorney/client, by the time the trial was over, the pair had fallen in love.  In the meantime, Sharon--who had announced that he would sooner throw everything he had into San Francisco Bay than give another nickel of it to Sarah--prepared to contest the court’s decision.

As a side note, when I was reading about this case, you can imagine how delighted I was to encounter the name of my old pal Mary Ellen Pleasant, a woman who clearly attracted dysfunctional relationships the way a magnet attracts iron filings.  Sarah and Mary Ellen were long-time friends.  Pleasant bankrolled Sarah's lawsuit, and appeared in court with her nearly every day.  The newspapers enjoyed spreading assertions that San Francisco’s notorious “Voodoo Queen” had also been providing more unorthodox legal assistance in the form of various unpleasant-sounding spells and rituals.  Sarah denied most of the more lurid details, but she did finally have to admit to bribing a gravedigger to bury a pair of Sharon’s socks in a freshly-dug grave.  Apparently, once the socks rotted, the Senator would die.  Everyone laughed at this story…until Sharon suddenly and unexpectedly dropped dead not long afterwards.  

So.

Sarah and Terry married just weeks after Sharon was socked, so to speak.  Meanwhile, the late Senator’s appeal of the case carried on.  Justice Stephen Johnson Fields of San Francisco’s U.S. Circuit Court eventually overturned the lower courts’ ruling.  Fields, blithely ignoring the fact that several handwriting experts had testified that Sharon’s signature on the “marriage contract” was genuine, took it upon himself to declare that it was a forgery.  After Sharon had died, Sarah had produced a will she claimed he had written, in which he left everything to her.  Not surprisingly, Fields said that was fraudulent, as well.

Sarah did not take the ruling well.  When Fields’ verdict was read in the courthouse, she stood up, yelled some very unladylike epithets at the judge, and wailed that Fields had been bribed by Sharon’s son.  She opened her purse, and reached for the revolver she always carried with her.  When security guards began hustling the outraged woman from the room, Terry pulled out a knife and ordered the guards to release his wife.  He hit one of them, knocking out a tooth.  This bit of misplaced gallantry got Terry arrested and imprisoned for six months.  Sarah got thirty days for contempt of court.  Later, the pair’s courtroom antics also caused them to be indicted by a federal grand jury.  The California Supreme Court upheld Fields’ verdict, also stating that Sarah and Sharon had never been legally married.

After their release from prison, Mr. and Mrs. Terry retreated to their Fresno ranch in apparent defeat.  However, the tragedies were just getting started.  On the morning of August 14, 1889, the couple boarded a train in Fresno.  Through a stroke of appallingly bad luck, Justice Fields happened to be on that same train, accompanied by Marshal David Neagle, whom the court had appointed as Fields’ bodyguard.  At 7 am, the train paused in Lathrop, and the passengers disembarked to eat breakfast at the railroad station’s dining room.

When Sarah and her husband entered the dining room, they immediately spotted Fields.  Sarah dashed back to the train, apparently to get her trusty revolver.  Meanwhile, Terry menacingly approached Fields from behind, raising his hand to slap the justice.  Neagle stood up and yelled, “Stop that!  I am an officer!”  Neagle then drew his gun and shot Terry through the heart.  He died almost instantly.

Neagle was arrested at the scene, but was soon released thanks to a writ of habeas corpus.  The courts eventually ruled his actions had been within the scope of his authority as a Marshal.

After Terry’s shocking death, Sarah--who does not seem to have been the most stable personality even at the best of times--went completely to pieces.  She became obsessed with hiring mediums in an effort to contact her dead husband.  She took to aimlessly wandering the San Francisco streets, convinced that she was being hypnotically attacked.  There were periods when she would physically assault anyone within range.  Finally, Mary Ellen Pleasant--one of the very few people who had stuck by Sarah--felt she had no choice but to have her friend committed.  After a brief hearing in front of the Insanity Commission, where she was diagnosed with “dementia praecox” (what we now call “schizophrenia,”) 41-year-old Sarah was committed to the Stockton State Hospital on March 11, 1892.  It would be her home for the rest of her long life.

During her first few years in the institution, Sarah was often so violent that she had to be restrained, but she eventually settled down, buoyed by the delusion that the hospital was her grand mansion, and the staff and other patients were her servants.  She died of pneumonia at the age of 86, on February 14, 1937.  Compared to Sarah’s fate, the two men in her life got off pretty easily.

Friday, August 28, 2026

Weekend Link Dump

 


Welcome to this week's Link Dump!

Just watch out for Strange Company HQ's resident flirt.



How the California Gold Rush birthed the modern world.

The sound of King Tut's trumpets.

I suppose the moral here is, if you're going to commit murder, make sure that the victim is someone nobody will mourn.

"Enigmatic tablets" from the Bronze Age.

How a kitten joined an Ohio construction crew.

19th century Yankee adventurers in the Pacific.

The shame of beardlessness.

Cyborg cockroaches.  With syringes!

Those wicked Amazonian dolphins.

The complexities of ancient cave art.

The women of the Crusades.

The execution of an alchemist.

D-Day in contemporary newspapers.

The latest in the search for Noah's Ark.

The Vegetable Marrow Riots.

One man's obsession with a jar of spicy mustard.

The queen who used King Arthur as a marketing tool.

The disappearances of two elderly women.

Letters from medieval students who could use a little cash.

The "desire paths" of the East End.

Pro tip: Never take a cookie from a scientist.

Medieval animals on trial.

The haunted Cariboo Trail.

A 1900 visit to London's dog cemetery.

An ancient cave sanctuary and "the Lady."

18th century Jesuits meet Chilean UFOs.

That's all for this week!  See you on Monday, when we'll look at a very bad romantic breakup.  "Bad" as in "lawsuits, voodoo curses, and shootings."  In the meantime, speaking of breakups...


Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Newspaper Clipping of the Day

Via Newspapers.com



The following story goes in that bulging file known as “restless ghosts of murder victims.”  The “Ithaca Journal,” August 12, 1922:

Painesville, Ohio, Aug. 12--A "ghost" which farmers living near Paines Hollow say has been haunting them for seven years, is "at rest" today. It disappeared several days ago with the burial of the body of Henry Lipenstick, found in an abandoned well on a farm. Lipenstick, a farm hand, disappeared seven years ago. Since then the farm is said to have had poor crops.

A farm house burned down and the "ghost" was blamed for that. Owner after owner has come and gone. Carl Logies purchased the farm about a year ago. Whenever he went to his barn at night, Logies said today, he would see "a white wraithlike figure" walking about. At times he declared, he followed it with his gun in hand and it always disappeared in the direction of the well. Determined to find out what caused the apparition, Logies cleaned out the old well, which had been filled with stones.

He came upon the body of Lipenstick. Sheriff Spink was called and he and his deputies suspected murder. The next day the sheriff ordered the body buried and now the "ghost"' is gone. Frank Loerman, who owned the farm at the time Lipenstick disappeared, is in Lake County Jail. He was bound over to the grand jury on charges of murder.

The actual evidence against Loerman (his name was most often given as “Lerman” in contemporary accounts) proved to be virtually nonexistent, and he was soon freed.  Lipenstick’s murder was never solved, but the ghost apparently vanished for good.  Perhaps just seeing the body given a decent burial was enough to satisfy his spirit.

Monday, August 24, 2026

The Welsh Servant




The 1883 book “Shropshire Folk-lore: A Sheaf of Gleanings” included a story about what we today would call a “poltergeist” which appeared to center around an enigmatic farm servant.  While the tale purports to be true, at this distance of time it is impossible to say how much of it is fact, and how much is legend.  Still, it’s such a quaintly charming little curiosity that I wanted to bring it under the Strange Company tent.

It is perhaps a hundred years or more since a certain Mr. Nichols lived at Yockleton Park, some miles west of Shrewsbury, farming his land and bringing up a large family of sons and daughters. One summer he engaged a Welshman to help in the harvest, and as he proved industrious and a good workman, he was allowed by his own wish to stay on through the winter, till the usual West Shropshire “changing time,” in May. He was lodged and boarded in the house, of course. “The men”—i.e. the unmarried farm-labourers—were an important part of every homely country household in those days. Well, time went on; the Welshman continued to give satisfaction, and nothing unusual occurred during his stay, till one night during “the Christmas,” the whole family were suddenly aroused just after midnight by an extraordinary noise downstairs, something like heavy chains being dragged about, clanking and rumbling. Hours were early in those days, every one had long been in bed, and they were perplexed and frightened. The farmer’s sons got up and called the men, and all went down in a body to see what was the matter. Everything was perfectly quiet; the furniture was all in its place, no one was about, nothing was to be seen or heard. Then the Welshman proposed to go out-of-doors; but his masters, unnerved by finding it impossible to account for the mysterious noise, refused to allow the door to be opened. Still the man persisted. “I must go out,” he said, “I cannot rest in!” He urged his request with so much earnestness and anxiety, that at last, impressed by his excited manner, they opened the door. Out went the man at once into the black darkness, all alone. The door was shut and barred behind him—the awe-stricken watchers waited and listened — 

He never came back!

What became of him no one ever knew; his wages lay unclaimed in his master’s hands, put carefully aside in readiness for his return: but alive or dead, the Welsh servant was never seen nor heard of more, 

This story was long afterwards related by one of the daughters of the house to her grand-daughter, now an old lady, from whom we have it. She gave it as a narrative of facts, believed in the family to be perfectly true, with no hint of any supernatural character attaching to the Welsh servant; yet I cannot but regard him as a modern rationalized version of the trusty “drudging goblin,” who takes service with an earthly master, and generally vanishes mysteriously at last.

Friday, August 21, 2026

Weekend Link Dump

 



Welcome to the Link Dump, where this week, our Strange Company HQ staffers give a shout-out to Clarence, Iowa!

Well, why not.  I'm sure it's a charming place.



Where the hell is the Pedro Mountain Mummy?

The tomb of King Midas' father.

Graham Greene in Mexico.

A look at supernatural smells.

A German liner goes to war.

A woman accused of murdering her sister.

A mysterious object named Phoebe is zipping around the galaxy.

A reminder that it's really not a good idea to steal cursed rocks.

An appreciation of Washington Irving.

The enigma of the Tartaria Empire.

A visit to Volvo Island.

Two aristocratic New York cats.

A successful 18th century silk designer.

The strange case of the Burning Boarder.

A 3,000 year old gold ceremonial headdress.

A history of the UK's "marriage franchise."

The Canadian town with a gopher museum.

The "hard and sorrowful" job of photographing the dead.

Some newly discovered ancient standing stones.

The medieval version of Artificial Intelligence.

America's deadliest maritime disaster.

Leopold II, the King of Terror.

The homes that inspired "Rebecca."

The latest news from Gobekli Tepe.

Some decisive medieval battles.

The most remote spot on Earth is--not really surprisingly--a rather odd place.

WWII's worst civilian air disaster.

A technological revolution from 146,000 years ago.

Rewriting history in the Amazon.

A teenager who was a spy during the American Revolution.

A brief history of the smorgasbord.

Someone finally figured out what the Civil War needed:  More cats.


That's all for this week!  See you on Monday, when we'll look at a very strange servant.  In the meantime, wind your way down to Baker Street.

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

Newspaper Clipping of the Day

Via Newspapers.com



On this blog, I’ve covered what many Fortean experts like to call “Anomalous Falls From the Sky,” but this is a new one for me.  Lousy actors and criminals in the stocks used to get pelted with tomatoes, but it’s a bit unusual for modern-day suburbanites to get such treatment.  The following is from a syndicated 1998 Dave Barry column which summarizes the incident.  Unfortunately, I haven’t been able to find the original story, which appeared in the “Calvert County Recorder” on August 27, 1997.

This article states that on Aug. 25, Gloria Daniels, 68, of Lusby, Md., was working in her garden with a young neighbor boy when she was hit by a falling tomato. Then the boy was hit by a tomato. Then tomatoes--more than 30 of them--began raining down all over her yard.

Friends, neighbors and the media were called in to investigate, but nobody could figure out where the tomatoes--which appeared to be falling straight down out of the sky--were coming from. Rob Terry, the reporter who wrote the story for The Recorder, states that, while on the scene, he personally was struck by a tomato, and although he quickly investigated, he could find no evidence that it was hurled by pranksters. 

I called Gloria Daniels recently and asked her if anybody had come up with an explanation for the falling tomatoes, and she said nobody had. 

"It's a mystery," she said. 

I asked her if she had been in touch with anybody at "The X-Files," and she said she'd never heard of it.


Monday, August 17, 2026

The Mystery of "Mary Anderson"

"Kitsap Sun," February 18, 1997, via Newspapers.com



Every suicide is a tragedy, of course.  However, among the most poignant ones are where the person remains unidentified.  Did they leave behind loved ones who suffered the agony of never knowing what happened to them?  Or--possibly even sadder--did this person have no one in the world who cared if they lived or died?  The following case could fall into either category.

On October 9, 1996, a neatly-dressed, well-groomed woman took a cab to the posh Hotel Vintage Park in Seattle, Washington.  She had phoned earlier in the day to reserve a room.  She paid $350 in cash for a two-night stay, and signed the register, “Mary A. Anderson.”

Her stay in Room 214 was eerily quiet.  She made no phone calls, ordered nothing from room service.  She merely put out a “Do Not Disturb” sign, and made her very private plans.  At some point, the woman reapplied her lipstick, tidied her hair, wrote a brief note on hotel stationary, took up a Bible, and in a glass, mixed together Metamucil, water, and cyanide.  She drank the liquid down, and lay down on the bed to die.  She obviously researched her method of death very carefully.  Although cyanide on its own is a very nasty way to go, mixed with Metamucil, potassium cyanide turns into hydrogen cyanide, which ensures an equally quick, but fairly painless end.

When the guest in Room 214 failed to check out by noon on October 11th, the front-desk manager sent the bellman to speak to her.  There was no answer to his knock on the door, and a deadbolt prevented him from entering the room.  A passkey was used to open the door.  When they finally were able to enter the room, they found “Mary Anderson” lying on her back on her bed, with the Bible clasped to her chest, open to the 23rd Psalm.  At first glance, she appeared to be sleeping peacefully, but a quick check of her pulse confirmed that she was very dead.  The note she had written was on the desk.  It read, “To whom it may concern:  I have decided to end my life and no one is responsible for my death.”  She added, “I have no relatives.  You can use my body as you choose.”

At first, police felt they had little to investigate.  The room was in perfect order.  The dead woman’s expensive clothes were hanging neatly in the closet.  Her purse contained $36.78 in cash, but no ID, credit cards, or anything else to identify her.  There were no signs of foul play.  A remarkable number of people choose to commit suicide in hotel rooms--if you live alone, it’s a way of insuring that your body is quickly found--and this seemed to be just another in that grim list.  Sad, but hardly unusual.

Then things began to get weird.  The New York address she gave the hotel did not exist.  Neither did the phone number.  Later analysis of her signature on the hotel register found signs of hesitation which strongly suggested that “Mary Anderson” was a name she made up on the spot.  Investigators ran her fingerprints through the FBI’s identification system.  They checked missing-person records in the U.S. and Canada.  They checked with Interpol.  They checked with manufacturers of cyanide.  They spread the story to the media, hoping that someone would come forward to identify her.  And they wound up with absolutely nothing.  In short, the dead woman wanted to ensure that she could not be identified, and she did a damned good job of it.  

This unusual suicide gave investigators a few clues into her personality: she was clearly an intelligent and meticulous woman.  She appeared to have been prosperous.  Her ability to procure cyanide--not something you can just pick up at a local drugstore--and her expertise about mixing it with Metamucil suggested she might have had a background in the mining or chemical industries.  Her ability to erase any clues to her identity made some wonder if she had been connected to intelligence services.

The dead woman’s body provided a bit more information about her.  She had a copper IUD in her uterus, but the serial number on the device was too worn away to allow it to be traced.  At some point, she had cosmetic surgery done on her breasts.  She was 5’8” and weighed 240 pounds.  She had short auburn hair and brown eyes.  Her age was estimated at between 35 and 45.  She had never given birth.  She had been in good health.  Her plucked eyebrows, expensive Estee Lauder makeup, perfect teeth, and manicured nails suggested that she had been in the habit of taking care of herself.  Many years later, DNA testing determined that “Mary” likely had genealogical roots in Eastern Iran or Afghanistan, with Persian heritage.  Unfortunately, none of this explained who she was, and why she had taken her own life in such a mysterious manner.  M. Arly of the King County Medical Examiner’s Office sighed, "She did one of the most thorough jobs of obliterating her ID that I have ever seen in my career.  She could have taught the FBI tricks."  Arly’s comments highlight the question that has kept this case alive:  Why was this woman so determined not to be identified?

To date, all efforts to discover the true name of “Mary Anderson” have continued to hit a brick wall.  The county paid $479 for her “Jane Doe” burial in Crown Hill Cemetery, where she rests in the anonymity she so obviously craved.  One almost wants to congratulate her for outwitting us all.

Friday, August 14, 2026

Weekend Link Dump

 


Welcome to this week's Link Dump!

IS EVERYBODY HAPPY???




What the hell was the Whitechapel Mount?

Fair play for cannibals.

The "wonderful year" 1759.

The mysterious Great Serpent Mound.

Why the number 17 was not popular in ancient Rome.

BREAKING:  Scientists have just discovered dogs.  (Note: Cats can tell if you're sad, too.  They just usually don't care.)

The lady who was eulogized as "phosphate of lime."

Five notable female writers of fairy tales.

It's a bedsheet!  It's a wartime diary!

The days of deadly hatpins.

The mystery of the disappearing town.

A look at medieval pets.

The records of a medieval inquisitor.

A congressman commits a scandalous murder.

Herbert Hoover's unexpected road to the White House.

Love letters from a WWII soldier turn up in an unexpected place.

It wasn't always easy to be an Assyrian king.  Especially if you wanted to die in your bed.

Alchemy has always been a strange line of work.

The MP who may have invented lawn tennis.

Two cases of families going missing.

The DNA on the Shroud of Turin.

That's a wrap for this week!  See you on Monday, when we'll look at a mysterious suicide.  In the meantime, here's Randy Newman and friends:


Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Newspaper Clipping of the Day

Via Newspapers.com



This odd case of a man and his apparent doppelganger appeared in the “Vancouver World,” July 21, 1894:

"There is a mystery now of five years standing in the lumber regions of Northern Pennsylvania," said George W. Culp of the Upper Susquehanna Valley, “the clearing up of which would give a great deal of satisfaction to the people in that region. Five years ago John Shehan came to work as a logger in the west branch. He was from Canada--a very giant of a fellow, with a red scar on his left cheek, the result of an accident in the lumber woods of the Dominion, and one eyetooth missing, He was a surly sort of a person and got into frequent disputes with his fellow workers, as well as with his employer.  After a very heated dispute with the foreman of his camp one day, the foreman discharged the man and he went away, telling one of the loggers that he was going back to Canada.  The next day somе of the men went to town and the postmaster said to one of them, 

‘That man Shehan of yours is a little off ain't he? He came in here yesterday and asked if there was any mail for him. There was a letter. I gave it to him. Hе opened the letter and read it, seemed satisfied with its contents and put it in his pocket and walked out. In less than 20 minutes afterward he came in again and asked me if there was any mail for him. I was considerably surprised, and told him I had given him all there was for him.

‘When?’ said he.

‘Why, a few minutes ago,’ I replied.

‘I haven't been in here for a month!’ he exclaimed.

‘In spite of all my efforts to convince him of his error, he insisted that he had not been in the store and had received no letter, and he went out furious.’

“The day after that the men on the creek were collecting the logs as they came down into the boom, when suddenly a driver startled all of his companions by exclaiming, ‘Here's the dead body of a man!’

"In a moment a half dozen men were at the spot and the body was dragged ashore. As it rolled over on its back the men recognized it as that of John Shehan. Subsequent investigation showed that there must have been some ground for the postmaster's belief as to Shehan's sanity, for the letter was found on the body.  If there had been any doubt as to the identity of the body, the scar on the cheek and a missing eyetooth would have them all at rest. Some were of the opinion that he had committed suicide, while deranged, but the coroner's verdict was that the drowning was accidental. The men gave the body a decent burial and a letter was sent to Shehan's mother in Canada notifying her of her son's sad death. A week later a letter came from her which contained the incredible information that there had to be a mistake about her son's death.  He had arrived home the day before the receipt of the letter announcing his death, and was even then there, alive and well.  This letter was followed by another from Shehan himself to a friend in the camp wanting to know what the report of his drowning meant.  There wasn't a man in the camp but what would have sworn he had seen John Shehan's body buried, and the grave was even opened to see if the body was still there, and it was.  On the strength of this the camp could not be satisfied until someone went to Canada and investigated the alleged living John Shehan there. Shehan's friend, who had known him from a boy, and another man at the camp went to Canada. They returned in a few days and reported that there was no mistake about the man in Canada. He was John Shehan beyond any kind of doubt, alive and in the flesh, as quarrelsome as ever. Then who was John Shehan’s double, whose name must have been John Shehan too, for it was he who inquired for the letter under that name and got it. Neither John Shehan in Canada nor his mother had ever known such a person.  The letter the Shehan double took from the post office was intended for the Canada Shehan, as it was identified by him as from bis mother: but the Shehan double must have expected a letter, too, of similar import, for it had seemed to satisfy him when he read it in the post office. Then who was the drowned man? And where did he come from?  That was an unsolved mystery then, and it is an unsolved mystery yet.”