Skip to content

Support plural references - #52

Merged
danielgtaylor merged 5 commits into
developfrom
plural-refs
Feb 5, 2015
Merged

danielgtaylor merged 5 commits into
developfrom
plural-refs

Conversation

@danielgtaylor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This change refactors the way that references are created to reuse the
existing response handling code for loading resources. As a side effect,
this supports plural references.

This is mainly future-proofing and removing some code duplication.

cc @jamesls @kyleknap

This change refactors the way that references are created to reuse the
existing response handling code for loading references. As a side effect,
this supports plural references.
@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor added the enhancement This issue requests an improvement to a current feature. label Feb 4, 2015
@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor self-assigned this Feb 4, 2015
Adds more tests and fixes a couple of longstanding issues so that plural
references will actually work when used. Rather than just laying the
groundwork like previous commits, this completes the feature.
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 98.59% when pulling d175554 on plural-refs into d2c8090 on develop.

@danielgtaylor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@kyleknap the latest push includes the JMESPath data member fixes we discussed yesterday and updated tests. Please have another look!

@kyleknap

kyleknap commented Feb 5, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks good. 🚒

danielgtaylor added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2015
Support plural references.
@danielgtaylor
danielgtaylor merged commit 646453d into develop Feb 5, 2015
@danielgtaylor
danielgtaylor deleted the plural-refs branch February 5, 2015 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement This issue requests an improvement to a current feature.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants