docs: add guidance on migrating between services without downtime - #4819
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Thiru-2004-varul <thiruvarulg9@gmail.com>
|
|
|
Welcome @Thiru-2004-varul! |
|
Hi @Thiru-2004-varul. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: shraddhabang, Thiru-2004-varul The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Issue
Fixes #4810
Description
Adds a short section to the blue/green traffic splitting doc explaining how to migrate an Ingress backend from one Service to another without dropping active connections.
Currently, directly changing the backend service name causes the controller to delete the existing target group and create a new one, dropping connections immediately without respecting deregistration_delay.timeout_seconds. This isn't a bug β it's existing behavior β but the recommended alternative (weighted target groups via the actions.* annotation) wasn't documented for this specific use case.
This PR adds a "Migrating between services without downtime" section to docs/guide/use_cases/blue_green/index.md, describing how to use the existing weighted target group feature to shift traffic gradually and avoid dropped connections.
Checklist
README.md, or thedocsdirectory)