You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Maybe de-wrap annotations and potentially other collection elements. #14
without a wrapper. While FMI 3.0 did this for many elements, it did not do so for the annotations.
For SSP we might or might not want to move in this direction,
The benefit is the reduced XML size and more readable content, since the wrapper is really for the most part redundant.
The disadvantage is that this would move SSP 2.0 much farther from 1.0, which while not fully backward compatible can probably still be read by the same parser (i.e. you can construct a 2.0 parser that easily reads 1.0, whereas with this structural change, you probably would maintain two separate parsers).
Personally I would not go for this for 2.0, due to the change impact, and our timeline constraints, and the need to also reflect this in SSP Traceability, ideally.
Activity
pmai commentedon Sep 15, 2023
Personally I would not go for this for 2.0, due to the change impact, and our timeline constraints, and the need to also reflect this in SSP Traceability, ideally.
DagBruck commentedon Jun 9, 2024
In general I think this is a desirable simplification, but not essential.