Cosmetics Explained

Cosmetics are substances that are intended for application to the body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering appearance. They are mixtures of chemical compounds derived from either natural sources or created synthetically.[1] Cosmetics have various purposes, including personal and skin care. They can also be used to conceal blemishes and enhance natural features (such as the eyebrows and eyelashes). Makeup can add color to the face, enhance features, or alter appearance to resemble a different person, creature, or object.[2]

People have used cosmetics for thousands of years for skin care and appearance enhancement.[3] Visible cosmetics for both women and men have gone in and out of fashion over the centuries.

Some early cosmetics contained harmful ingredients, such as lead, which caused serious health problems and sometimes resulted in death. Modern commercial cosmetics are generally tested for safety but may contain controversial ingredients, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), formaldehyde releasers, and ingredients that cause allergic reactions.

The European Union and regulatory agencies around the world have stringent regulations for cosmetics. In the United States, cosmetic products and ingredients do not require FDA approval, although marketed products are monitored for safety. Some countries have banned using animal testing for cosmetics.

Definition and etymology

The word cosmetics is derived from the Greek Greek, Modern (1453-);: ÎșÎżÏƒÎŒÎ·Ï„ÎčÎșᜎ τέχΜη (Greek, Modern (1453-);: kosmetikē tekhnē), meaning "technique of dress and ornament," from Greek, Modern (1453-);: ÎșÎżÏƒÎŒÎ·Ï„ÎčÎșός (Greek, Modern (1453-);: kosmētikos), "skilled in ordering or arranging,"[4] and from Greek, Modern (1453-);: ÎșÏŒÏƒÎŒÎżÏ‚ (Greek, Modern (1453-);: kosmos), meaning "order" and "ornament.".[5]

Legal definition

Though often referred to socially as makeup, cosmetics technically include substances used to clean or alter the complexion, skin, hair, or teeth -- placing eye shadow, teeth-whitening strips, and perfumes under the same umbrella.[6]

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates cosmetics,[7] defines cosmetics as products "intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance without affecting the body's structure or functions." This broad definition includes any material intended for use as an ingredient in a cosmetic product, with the FDA specifically excluding pure soap from this category.[8]

Use

Cosmetics designed for skin care may be used to cleanse, exfoliate and protect the skin, as well as replenish it, using body lotions, cleansers, toners, serums, moisturizers, eye creams, retinol, and balms. Cosmetics designed for more general personal care, such as shampoo, soap, and body wash, can be used to clean the body.

Cosmetics designed to enhance one's appearance (makeup) can be used to conceal blemishes, enhance one's natural features, or add color to a person's face. In some cases, more extreme forms of makeup are used for performances, fashion shows, and people in costume and can change the appearance of the face entirely to resemble a different person, creature, or object. Techniques for changing appearance include contouring, which aims to give shape to an area of the face.

Cosmetics can also be designed to add fragrance to the body.

Products used for haircare, such as permanent waves, hair colors, and hairsprays, are classified as cosmetic products as well.[2]

History

See main article: History of cosmetics. Cosmetics have been in use for thousands of years, with ancient Egyptians and Sumerians using them. In Europe, the use of cosmetics continued into the Middle Ages—where the face was whitened and the cheeks rouged—[9] Though attitudes towards cosmetics varied throughout time, the use of cosmetics was openly frowned upon at many points in Western history.[10] Regardless of the changes in social attitudes towards cosmetics, many occasionally achieved ideals of appearance through cosmetics.

According to one source, early major developments in cosmetics include:

Historically, the absence of regulation of the manufacture and use of cosmetics, as well as the absence of scientific knowledge regarding the effects of various compounds on the human body for much of this time period, led to a number of negative effects upon those who used cosmetics, including deformities, blindness, and, in some cases, death. Although harmless products were used, such as berries and beetroot, many cosmetic products available at this time were still chemically dubious and even poisonous. Examples of the prevalent usage of harmful cosmetics include the use of ceruse (white lead) throughout a number of different cultures, such as during the Renaissance in the West, and blindness caused by the mascara Lash Lure during the early 20th century. During the 19th century, there were numerous incidents of lead poisoning due to the fashion for red and white lead makeup and powder, leading to swelling and inflammation of the eyes, weakened tooth enamel, and blackened skin, with heavy use known to lead to death.[11] Usage of white lead was not confined only to the West, with the white Japanese face makeup known as Japanese: [[oshiroi]] also produced using white lead. In the second part of the 19th century, scientific advances in the production of makeup led to the creation of makeup free of hazardous substances such as lead.[12]

Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, changes in the prevailing attitudes towards cosmetics led to a wider expansion of the cosmetics industry. In 1882, English actress and socialite Lillie Langtry became the poster girl for Pears of London, making her the first celebrity to endorse a commercial product.[13] She allowed her name to be used on face powders and skin products.[14] During the 1910s, the market in the US was developed by figures such as Elizabeth Arden, Helena Rubinstein, and Max Factor. These firms were joined by Revlon just before World War II and Estée Lauder just after. By the middle of the 20th century, cosmetics were in widespread use by women in nearly all industrial societies around the world, with the cosmetics industry becoming a multibillion-dollar enterprise by the beginning of the 21st century.[15] The wider acceptance of the use of cosmetics led some to see makeup as a tool used in the oppression and subjection of women to unfair societal standards. In 1968, at the feminist Miss America protest, protesters symbolically threw a number of feminine products into a "Freedom Trash Can",[16] with cosmetics among the items the protesters called "instruments of female torture"[17] and accoutrements of what they perceived to be enforced femininity.

, the world's largest cosmetics company is L'Oréal, founded by EugÚne Schueller in 1909 as the French Harmless Hair Colouring Company (now owned by Liliane Bettencourt 26% and Nestlé 28%; the remaining 46% is traded publicly).

Although modern makeup has been traditionally used mainly by women, men also use makeup in order to enhance their own facial features or cover blemishes and dark circles. The negative stigma of men wearing makeup in countries such as the United States has weakened over the years, with the number of men using makeup increasing in the 21st century.[18] Cosmetics brands have increasingly targeted men in the sale of cosmetics, with some products targeted specifically at men.[19] [20]

Lead has been used as a makeup product since the 18th century. It is said to be lethal to women who apply it daily to achieve a pale complexion, representing nobility, as tanned skin represents the working class. Lead can be detrimental to people's health and cause death if mixed with vinegar, which it allows lead to be absorbed through the skin.[21]

Types of cosmetics

Though there are a large number of different cosmetics used for a variety of different purposes, all cosmetics are typically intended to be applied externally. These products can be applied to the face (on the skin, lips, eyebrows, and eyes), to the body (on the skin, particularly the hands and nails), and to the hair. These products may be intended for use as skincare, personal care, or to alter the appearance, with the subset of cosmetics known as makeup primarily referring to products containing colour pigments intended for the purpose of altering the wearer's appearance; some manufacturers will distinguish only between "decorative" cosmetics intended to alter the appearance and "care" cosmetics designed for skincare and personal care.

Most cosmetics are also distinguished by the area of the body intended for application, with cosmetics designed to be used on the face and eye area usually applied with a brush, a makeup sponge, or the fingertips. Cosmetics can also be described by the physical composition of the product. Cosmetics can be liquid or cream emulsions, powders (pressed or loose), dispersions, or anhydrous creams or sticks.

Decorative

Skincare

Cleansing is a standard step in skin care routines. Skin cleansing includes some or all of these steps or cosmetics:

Hair care

Hair care is a category of cosmetics devoted to products which are used to improve the appearance of hair.[29]

Perfume

Perfumes or fragrances, are liquids that can be sprayed or applied to produce a long-lasting smell.[31] They are created by mixing different compounds together. There are different groups of perfumes which are categorised according to their concentration.[31]

The difference between Eau de parfum and Eau de toilette is more about the perfume oil concentration. Eau de parfum has a higher concentration of perfume than Eau de toilette.

Tools

Various tools are used to apply cosmetics.

Brushes

Other applicators

In addition to brushes, a makeup sponge is a popular applicator. Makeup sponges can be used to apply foundation, blend concealer, and apply powder or highlighter.

Loofahs, microfiber cloths, natural sponges, or brushes may be used to exfoliate skin simply by rubbing them over the face in a circular motion. Gels, creams, or lotions may contain an acid to encourage dead skin cells to loosen, and an abrasive such as microbeads, sea salt and sugar, ground nut shells, rice bran, or ground apricot kernels to scrub the dead cells off the skin. Salt and sugar scrubs tend to be the harshest, while scrubs containing beads or rice bran are typically very gentle.

Ingredients

See main article: Ingredients of cosmetics. A variety of organic compounds and inorganic compounds comprise typical cosmetics. Typical organic compounds are modified natural oils and fats, as well as a variety of petrochemically derived agents. Inorganic compounds are processed minerals such as iron oxides, talc, and zinc oxide. The oxides of zinc and iron are classified as pigments, i.e., colorants that have no solubility in solvents. Cosmetic companies have become more transparent in the ingredients of their products because consumers are interested in the formula of their products.[33] The rise of "clean cosmetics" movement has led to more examination of ingredients in cosmetics from consumers. As a result of concerns about potential health risks associated with certain ingredients found in cosmetics, many brands have begun to formulate new products without these ingredients. This had started to lead to a new movement of "clean cosmetics."[34] Studies have shown that women of color are disproportionally exposed to harmful ingredients in cosmetics because certain beauty products are marketed towards women of color, and these products with harmful ingredients tend to be used more often in their community.[35]

Natural

See also: Organic movement and Maker culture. Handmade and certified organic products are becoming more mainstream due to consumer concerns that certain chemicals in some skincare products may be harmful if absorbed through the skin. The FDA, which regulates the US cosmetic industry, says, "FDA has not defined the term "natural" and has not established a regulatory definition for this term in cosmetic labeling."[36] It goes on to warn consumers, "choosing ingredients from sources you consider "organic" or "natural" is no guarantee that they are safe."

Mineral

The term "mineral makeup" applies to a category of face makeup, including foundation, eye shadow, blush, and bronzer, made with loose, dry mineral powders. These powders are often mixed with oil-water emulsions. Lipsticks, liquid foundations, and other liquid cosmetics, as well as compressed makeups such as eye shadow and blush in compacts, are often called mineral makeup if they have the same primary ingredients as dry mineral makeups. Liquid makeups must contain preservatives, and compressed makeups must contain binders, which dry mineral makeups do not. Mineral makeup usually does not contain synthetic fragrances, preservatives, parabens, mineral oil, or chemical dyes. For this reason, dermatologists may consider mineral makeup to be gentler on the skin than makeup that contains those ingredients.[37] Some minerals are nacreous or pearlescent, giving the skin a shining or sparking appearance. One example is bismuth oxychloride. There are various mineral-based makeup brands, including Bare Minerals, Tarte, Bobbi Brown, and Stila.

Microplastics

Cosmetic products can contain micro- or nanoplastics, either as ingredients or as contaminants from packaging or production[38] . Microplastics are intentionally added for texture enhancement, illuminating effects on the skin, product stabilisation or as an ingredient carrier[39] . Because most cosmetic products are applied on the face, hands or scalp, which are on average more humid than other body regions, the plastic particles can enter the body easily through hair follicles, sweat glands or abrasions. Microplastics can then have severe health outcomes on the skin, including inflammation, allergy development or even an increased risk of carcinogenesis[40] . On a molecular level, micro- nad nanoplastics can disturb communication pathways in cells by binding proteins or changing their secondary or tertiary structure[41] .

Packaging

See main article: Cosmetic packaging.

The term cosmetic packaging is used for primary packaging and secondary packaging of cosmetic products.

Primary packaging, also called cosmetic containers, houses the cosmetic product. It is in direct contact with the cosmetic product. Secondary packaging is the outer wrapping of one or several cosmetic container(s). An important difference between primary and secondary packaging is that any information that is necessary to clarify the safety of the product must appear on the primary package. Otherwise, much of the required information can appear on just the secondary packaging.[42]

Cosmetic packaging is standardized by ISO 22715, set by the International Organization for Standardization[43] and regulated by national or regional regulations such as those issued by the EU or the FDA. Marketers and manufacturers of cosmetic products must be compliant with these regulations to be able to market their cosmetic products in the corresponding areas of jurisdiction.[44]

Industry

The manufacture of cosmetics is dominated by a small number of multinational corporations that originated in the early 20th century, but the distribution and sales of cosmetics are spread among a wide range of businesses. The world's largest cosmetic companies are L'OrĂ©al, Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Shiseido, and EstĂ©e Lauder.[45] In 2005, the market volume of the cosmetics industry in the US, Europe, and Japan was about EUR 70 Billion/a year. In Germany, the cosmetic industry generated €12.6 billion of retail sales in 2008,[46] which makes the German cosmetic industry the third largest in the world, after Japan and the United States. German exports of cosmetics reached €5.8 billion in 2008, whereas imports of cosmetics totaled €3 billion.

The worldwide cosmetics and perfume industry currently generates an estimated annual turnover of US$170 billion (according to Eurostaf, May 2007). Europe is the leading market, representing approximately €63 billion, while sales in France reached €6.5 billion in 2006, according to FIPAR (FĂ©dĂ©ration des Industries de la Parfumerie – the French federation for the perfume industry).[47] France is another country in which the cosmetic industry plays an important role, both nationally and internationally. According to data from 2008, the cosmetic industry has grown constantly in France for 40 consecutive years. In 2006, this industrial sector reached a record level of €6.5 billion. Famous cosmetic brands produced in France include Vichy, Yves Saint Laurent, Yves Rocher, and many others.

The Italian cosmetic industry is also an important player in the European cosmetic market. Although not as large as in other European countries, the cosmetic industry in Italy was estimated to reach €9 billion in 2007. The Italian cosmetic industry is dominated by hair and body products and not makeup as in many other European countries. In Italy, hair and body products make up approximately 30% of the cosmetic market. Makeup and facial care are the most common cosmetic products exported to the United States.

According to Euromonitor International, the market for cosmetics in China is expected to be $7.4 billion in 2021 up from $4.3 billion in 2016. The increase is due to social media and the changing attitudes of people in the 18-to-30-year age bracket.[48]

Due to the popularity of cosmetics, especially fragrances, many designers who are not necessarily involved in the cosmetic industry came up with perfumes bearing their names. Moreover, some actors and singers (such as Celine Dion) have their own perfume line. Designer perfumes are, like any other designer products, the most expensive in the industry as the consumer pays for the product and the brand. Famous Italian fragrances are produced by Giorgio Armani, Dolce & Gabbana, and others.

Procter & Gamble, which sells CoverGirl and Dolce & Gabbana makeup, funded a study,[49] concluding that makeup makes women seem more competent.[50] Due to the source of funding, the quality of this Boston University study is questioned.

Cosmetics products may be retailed in beauty stores, department stores and hypermarkets, drugstores, variety stores, grocery stores, beauty supply stores, and many other formats, and in similar types of online stores or the online presence of these types of physical stores.

Cosmetic companies have changed their traditional methods of marketing by using social media influencers and brand ambassadors to market their products.

Safety evaluation

In the United States, cosmetic products and ingredients do not need FDA premarket approval, with the exception of color additives, but manufacturers are required to assure safety of the products.[51] The EU and other regulatory agencies around the world also have stringent regulations.[52] The FDA provides surveillance of cosmetics products, and exercises enforcement against companies that break manufacturing, labeling or marketing laws on cosmetic products, such as by issuing warning letters to companies making unapproved health claims.[53]

Perfumes are widely used in consumer products. Studies concluded from patch testing show fragrances contain some ingredients which may cause allergic reactions.[54]

Balsam of Peru was the main recommended marker for perfume allergy before 1977, it is still advised. The presence of Balsam of Peru in a cosmetic will be denoted by the INCI term Myroxylon pereirae. In some instances, Balsam of Peru is listed on the ingredient label of a product by one of its various names, but it may not be required to be listed by its name by mandatory labeling conventions (in fragrances, for example, it may simply be covered by an ingredient listing of "fragrance").[55] [56] [57] [58]

Animal testing

See main article: Testing cosmetics on animals.

Due to ethical concerns around animal testing, some nations have required evidence for safety that may involve animal testing for cosmetics.[59] Cosmetics manufacturers are encouraged to ensure safe products, having responsibility to establish the safety of individual ingredients and the final product before going to market.[59] When animal testing is used by a company, a national regulatory agency, such as the US FDA, encourages minimal use of animals and humane methods, also supporting that scientifically valid alternative methods to whole-animal testing be used.[59]

As of 2019, an estimated 50–100 million animals were tested each year in locations such as the United States and China.[60] Such tests may have involved eye and skin irritants, phototoxicity (toxicity triggered by ultraviolet light), and mutagenicity.[61] [62] In 2018, California banned the sale of animal-tested cosmetics.[63]

Cosmetics testing is banned in the Netherlands, India, Norway, Israel, New Zealand, Belgium, and the UK. In 2002, the European Union agreed to phase in a near-total ban on the sale of animal-tested cosmetics throughout the EU from 2009 and to ban all cosmetics-related animal testing.[64] In December 2009, the European Parliament and Council passed EC Regulation 1223/2009 on cosmetics, a bill to regulate the cosmetic industry in the EU. EC Regulation 1223/2009 took effect on July 11, 2013. In March 2013, the EU banned the import and sale of cosmetics containing ingredients tested on animals.[65] China required animal testing on cosmetic products until 2014, when they waived animal testing requirements for domestically produced products.[66] In 2019, China approved nine non-animal testing methods, and in 2020 laws making animal testing compulsory were lifted.[67]

In June 2017, legislation was proposed in Australia to end animal testing in the cosmetics industry.[68] In March 2019, the Australian Senate passed a bill that banned the use of data from animal testing in the cosmetic industry since July 1, 2020.[69]

Legislation

Europe

In the European Union, the manufacture, labelling, and supply of cosmetics and personal care products are regulated by Regulation EC 1223/2009. It applies to all the countries of the EU as well as Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland. This regulation applies to single-person companies making or importing just one product as well as to large multinationals. Manufacturers and importers of cosmetic products must comply with the applicable regulations in order to sell their products in the EU. In this industry, it is common fall back on a suitably qualified person, such as an independent third party inspection and testing company, to verify the cosmetics' compliance with the requirements of applicable cosmetic regulations and other relevant legislation, including REACH, GMP, hazardous substances, etc.[70] [71]

In the European Union, the circulation of cosmetic products and their safety have been the subject of legislation since 1976. One of the newest improvements to the regulation concerning the cosmetic industry is the ban on animal testing. Testing cosmetic products on animals has been illegal in the European Union since September 2004, and testing the separate ingredients of such products on animals is also prohibited by law, since March 2009 for some endpoints and full since 2013.[72]

Cosmetic regulations in Europe are often updated to follow the trends of innovations and new technologies while ensuring product safety. For instance, all annexes of Regulation 1223/2009 were aimed at addressing potential risks to human health.Under the EU cosmetic regulation, manufacturers, retailers, and importers of cosmetics in Europe will be designated as "responsible persons.". This new status implies that the responsible person has the legal liability to ensure that the cosmetics and brands they manufacture or sell comply with the current cosmetic regulations and norms. The responsible person is also responsible for the documents contained in the Product Information File (PIF), a list of product information including data such as Cosmetic Product Safety Report, product description, GMP statement, or product function.

United States

In 1938, the U.S. passed the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act authorizing the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to oversee safety via legislation in the cosmetic industry and its aspects in the United States.[73] [74] The FDA joined with 13 other federal agencies in forming the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) in 1997, which was intended to ban animal testing and find other methods to test cosmetic products,[75] although regulations in 2022 permit animal testing as a method to ensure safe use for consumers.[59]

The current law on cosmetics in the U.S. does not require cosmetic products and ingredients to have FDA approval before going on the market, except for color additives.[51] The Cosmetic Safety Enhancement Act was introduced in December 2019.[76]

Brazil

ANVISA (AgĂȘncia Nacional de VigilĂąncia SanitĂĄria, Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency) is the regulatory body responsible for cosmetic legislation and directives in the country. The rules apply to manufacturers, importers, and retailers of cosmetics in Brazil, and most of them have been harmonized so they can apply to the entire Mercosur.

The current legislation restricts the use of certain substances, such as pyrogallol, formaldehyde, or paraformaldehyde, and bans the use of others, such as lead acetate in cosmetic products. All restricted and forbidden substances and products are listed in the regulation RDC 16/11 and RDC 162, 09/11/01.

More recently, a new cosmetic Technical Regulation (RDC 15/2013) was set up to establish a list of authorized and restricted substances for cosmetic use, used in products such as hair dyes, nail hardeners, or used as product preservatives.

Most Brazilian regulations are optimized, harmonized, or adapted in order to be applicable and extended to the entire Mercosur economic zone.

International

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) published new guidelines on the safe manufacturing of cosmetic products under a Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) regime. Regulators in several countries and regions have adopted this standard, ISO 22716:2007, effectively replacing existing guidance and standards. ISO 22716 provides a comprehensive approach for a quality management system for those engaged in the manufacturing, packaging, testing, storage, and transportation of cosmetic end products. The standard deals with all aspects of the supply chain, from the early delivery of raw materials and components until the shipment of the final product to the consumer.

The standard is based on other quality management systems, ensuring smooth integration with such systems as ISO 9001 or the British Retail Consortium (BRC) standard for consumer products. Therefore, it combines the benefits of GMP, linking cosmetic product safety with overall business improvement tools that enable organisations to meet global consumer demand for cosmetic product safety certification.[77]

In July 2012, since microbial contamination is one of the greatest concerns regarding the quality of cosmetic products, the ISO introduced a new standard for evaluating the antimicrobial protection of a cosmetic product by preservation efficacy testing and microbiological risk assessment.

See also

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Book: Schneider. GĂŒnther. Skin Cosmetics. 2001. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. https://web.archive.org/web/20220221132540/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/14356007.a24_219. 21 February 2022. live. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. en. 10.1002/14356007.a24_219. 978-3-527-30673-2. 910197915. 2022-02-21. Gohla. Sven. Schreiber. Jörg. Kaden. Waltraud. Schönrock. Uwe. Schmidt-LewerkĂŒhne. Hartmut. Kuschel. Annegret. Petsitis. Xenia. Pape. Wolfgang.
  2. Nutrition . Center for Food Safety and Applied . 2023-03-16 . Cosmetics & U.S. Law . FDA . en . 2023-11-05 . 2023-11-05 . https://web.archive.org/web/20231105000647/https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/cosmetics-us-law .
  3. Web site: Matthias . Meg . 2025-06-13 . Why Did We Start Wearing Makeup? Britannica . 2025-09-18 . www.britannica.com . en.
  4. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert. ÎșÎżÏƒÎŒÎ·Ï„ÎčÎșός in A Greek-English Lexicon
  5. Liddell, Henry George and Scott, Robert. ÎșÏŒÏƒÎŒÎżÏ‚ in A Greek-English Lexicon
  6. Web site: Branch . Legislative Services . 2024-10-09 . Consolidated federal laws of Canada, Cosmetic Regulations . 2025-09-18 . laws-lois.justice.gc.ca.
  7. Web site: November 2004 . Cosmetics and Your Health – FAQs . bot: unknown . https://web.archive.org/web/20130312162359/https://www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/cosmetics-your-health.cfm . 2013-03-12 . Womenshealth.gov.
  8. Web site: Cosmetics Overview. 30 March 2019. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 30 March 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190330032557/https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ImportProgram/ImportBasics/RegulatedProducts/ucm511464.htm.
  9. Angeloglou, Maggie. The History of Make-up. First ed. Great Britain: The Macmillan Company, 1970. 41–42. Print.
  10. Book: Pallingston, J . Lipstick: A Celebration of the World's Favorite Cosmetic . 978-0-312-19914-2 . St. Martin's Press . 1998.
  11. Web site: 2008-01-10 . Suffering for beauty has ancient roots . 2024-06-13 . NBC News . en.
  12. Takakiwa . Manami . 2022 . Background of the Fabrication of Japan's First Lead-free White Powder and the Pharmacologists Who Certified Its Harmlessness . è–ŹćČ歩雑èȘŒ . 57 . 2 . 93–100 . 10.34531/jjhp.57.2_93.
  13. News: When Celebrity Endorsers Go Bad. 2 March 2022. The Washington Post. British actress Lillie Langtry became the world's first celebrity endorser when her likeness appeared on packages of Pears Soap.. 16 November 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20221116081428/https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2002/02/03/when-celebrity-endorsers-go-bad/260776e6-d38c-4319-b683-eb466c499dce/. live.
  14. Book: Marsh . Madeleine . Compacts and Cosmetics: Beauty from Victorian Times to the Present Day . 2014 . Casemate Publishers . 40.
  15. Web site: 2023 . A History of the Cosmetics Industry . American Cosmetic Association . 2023-02-28 . 2023-02-28 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230228143623/https://www.cosmeticassociation.org/cosmetic-products/a-history-of-the-cosmetics-industry/ . live .
  16. Dow. Bonnie J. . Feminism, Miss America, and Media Mythology . Rhetoric & Public Affairs . 6 . 1 . Spring 2003 . 127–149 . 10.1353/rap.2003.0028. 143094250 .
  17. Book: Duffett, Judith . WLM vs. Miss America . Voice of the Women's Liberation Movement . October 1968 . 4.
  18. News: O'Grady . Megan . Schorr . Collier . Holmes . Matt . 2021-05-10 . Makeup Is for Everyone . en-US . The New York Times . 2022-06-20 . 0362-4331 . 2022-06-20 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220620050837/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/10/t-magazine/men-makeup-gender-norms.html . live .
  19. Web site: North . Anna . What the rise of men's makeup means for masculinity . Vox . 10 April 2022 . en . 24 September 2018 . 10 April 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220410193427/https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2018/9/24/17851190/makeup-chanel-queer-eye-maybelline-men . live .
  20. News: Elan . Priya . Beauty and the bloke: why more men are wearing makeup . 10 April 2022 . the Guardian . 23 February 2020 . en . 10 April 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220410193427/https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/feb/23/beauty-and-the-bloke-why-more-men-are-chooisng-to-wear-makeup-warpaint . live .
  21. Web site: McNeill . Fiona E. . Dying for makeup: Lead cosmetics poisoned 18th-century European socialites in search of whiter skin . 2023-05-03 . The Conversation . 27 February 2022 . en . 2023-05-03 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230503011112/http://theconversation.com/dying-for-makeup-lead-cosmetics-poisoned-18th-century-european-socialites-in-search-of-whiter-skin-176237 . live .
  22. Web site: Eyebrow Pencil. live. 2021-08-24. Cosmetics Info. https://web.archive.org/web/20130806112505/https://cosmeticsinfo.org:80/products/eyebrow-pencil . 2013-08-06 .
  23. News: Riordan. Teresa. 2004-12-12. 'Inventing Beauty'. en-US. The New York Times. 2021-08-24. 0362-4331. 2021-08-24. https://web.archive.org/web/20210824233041/https://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/books/chapters/inventing-beauty.html. live.
  24. McDearmon, Christa. The Eyelash Extension Professional Training Manual: Instructor's Guide. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014.
  25. Web site: Soaps and cleansers . 2021-03-31. dermnetnz.org. 2021-04-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20210411001846/https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/soaps-and-cleansers. live.
  26. Sarkar. Rashmi. Arora. Pooja. Garg. K Vijay. 2013. Cosmeceuticals for Hyperpigmentation: What is Available?. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. 6. 1. 4–11. 10.4103/0974-2077.110089. 0974-2077. 3663177. 23723597 . free .
  27. Web site: British Association of Dermatologists – Sunscreen Fact Sheet. 2021-03-31. bad.org.uk. 2021-04-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20210411093845/https://www.bad.org.uk/for-the-public/skin-cancer/sunscreen-fact-sheet#how-do-sunscreens-work. live.
  28. Web site: British Association of Dermatologists – Sunscreen Fact Sheet. 2021-04-06. bad.org.uk. 2021-04-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20210411093845/https://www.bad.org.uk/for-the-public/skin-cancer/sunscreen-fact-sheet#how-do-sunscreens-work. live.
  29. Web site: Hair and Beauty Industry Statistics. 2021-03-31. National Hair & Beauty Federation. en. 2021-04-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20210411214148/https://www.nhbf.co.uk/advice-and-resources/hair-and-beauty-industry-statistics/. live.
  30. Web site: Shampoos. 2021-03-31. Medscape. 2021-05-02. https://web.archive.org/web/20210502174138/https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/706406. live.
  31. Web site: Fragrances and perfumes . 2021-03-31. dermnetnz.org. 2021-04-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20210411000800/https://dermnetnz.org/topics/fragrances-and-perfumes/. live.
  32. News: This Is the Real Difference Between Natural and Synthetic Makeup Brushes. Webster. Emma Sarran. Teen Vogue. 2018-05-07. en. 2018-05-07. https://web.archive.org/web/20180507153622/https://www.teenvogue.com/story/real-and-synthetic-makeup-brushes-difference-guide. live.
  33. Web site: Biron . Bethany . Beauty has blown up to be a $532 billion industry – and analysts say that these 4 trends will make it even bigger . 2022-06-20 . Business Insider . en-US . 2022-06-20 . https://web.archive.org/web/20220620034418/https://www.businessinsider.com/beauty-multibillion-industry-trends-future-2019-7 . live .
  34. Web site: MD . Molly Wanner . MSHS . Neera Nathan, MD . 2019-03-04 . Clean cosmetics: The science behind the trend . 2025-04-24 . Harvard Health . en.
  35. Zota . Ami R. . Shamasunder . Bhavna . October 2017 . The environmental injustice of beauty: framing chemical exposures from beauty products as a health disparities concern . American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 217 . 4 . 418.e1–418.e6 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.020 . 1097-6868 . 5614862 . 28822238.
  36. Nutrition . Center for Food Safety and Applied . 2022-03-04 . Small Businesses & Homemade Cosmetics: Fact Sheet . FDA . en . 2023-02-27 . 2023-03-11 . https://web.archive.org/web/20230311235935/https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/resources-industry-cosmetics/small-businesses-homemade-cosmetics-fact-sheet . live .
  37. Web site: The Lowdown on Mineral Makeup . WebMD . 29 October 2018 . 2 . 16 November 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20181116025230/https://www.webmd.com/beauty/features/the-lowdown-on-mineral-makeup#2 . live .
  38. Aristizabal . Miguel . JimĂ©nez‐Orrego . Katherine V. . Caicedo‐LeĂłn . MarĂ­a D. . PĂĄez‐CĂĄrdenas . Laura S. . Castellanos‐GarcĂ­a . Isabella . Villalba‐Moreno . Dennys L. . RamĂ­rez‐Zuluaga . Luisa V. . Hsu . Jeffrey T. S. . Jaller . Jose . Gold . Michael . March 2024 . Microplastics in dermatology: Potential effects on skin homeostasis . Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology . en . 23 . 3 . 766–772 . 10.1111/jocd.16167 . 1473-2130.
  39. Han . Ju Hee . Kim . Hei Sung . 2025-08-12 . Microplastics in Cosmetics: Emerging Risks for Skin Health and the Environment . Cosmetics . en . 12 . 4 . 171 . 10.3390/cosmetics12040171 . free. 2079-9284.
  40. Celebi Sozener . Zeynep . Özbey YĂŒcel . ÜmĂŒs . Altiner . Seda . Ozdel OztĂŒrk . BetĂŒl . Cerci . Pamir . TĂŒrk . Murat . GorgĂŒlĂŒ Akin . BegĂŒm . Akdis . MĂŒbeccel . Yilmaz . Insu . Ozdemir . Cevdet . Mungan . Dilsad . Akdis . Cezmi A. . 2022-07-08 . The External Exposome and Allergies: From the Perspective of the Epithelial Barrier Hypothesis . Frontiers in Allergy . English . 3 . 10.3389/falgy.2022.887672 . free. 2673-6101 . 9304993 . 35873598.
  41. HollĂłczki . Oldamur . Gehrke . Sascha . 2019-11-05 . Nanoplastics can change the secondary structure of proteins . Scientific Reports . en . 9 . 1 . 16013 . 10.1038/s41598-019-52495-w . 2045-2322 . 6831684 . 31690820.
  42. Web site: Understanding the Cosmetics Regulation. Cosmetics Europe Association. 3 November 2016. 4 November 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20161104014506/https://www.cosmeticseurope.eu/cosmetics-industry/understanding-cosmetics-regulation/. live.
  43. Web site: International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22715:2006 Cosmetics – Packaging and labelling. ISO.org. 2 November 2016. 4 November 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20161104014445/http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=36436. live.
  44. Web site: 2023 . Summary of Cosmetics Labeling Requirements . United States Food and Drug Administration . 2023-02-28 . 2019-12-13 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191213121829/https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-labeling-regulations/summary-cosmetics-labeling-requirements .
  45. https://web.archive.org/web/20081209102412/https://www.scribd.com/doc/3027409/Top-100-Cosmetic-Manufacturers Top 100 Cosmetic Manufacturers
  46. Web site: Cosmetic Industry. 2010-08-04. https://web.archive.org/web/20100908122058/https://www.german-business-portal.info/GBP/Navigation/en/Business-Location/Manufacturing%20Industries/cosmetics-industry%2Cdid%3D326082.html. 2010-09-08.
  47. Web site: France continues to lead the way in cosmetics . 24 July 2008 . ClickPress . 21 February 2022 . 2 May 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210502081050/https://www.clickpress.com/releases/Detailed/82987005cp.shtml . live .
  48. News: Wei . Daniela . Bloggers Touting Makeup Secrets Spur Estee Lauder's China Sales . . 2017-05-31 . 2017-06-02 . 2017-06-01 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170601071158/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-31/bloggers-touting-makeup-secrets-spur-estee-lauder-s-china-sales . live .
  49. Cosmetics as a Feature of the Extended Human Phenotype: Modulation of the Perception of Biologically Important Facial Signals . PLOS ONE. 6. 10. e25656. 10.1371/journal.pone.0025656. 21991328. 3185017. 2011. Etcoff. N. L.. Stock. S. Haley. L. E.. Vickery. S. A.. House. D. M.. 2011PLoSO...625656E. free.
  50. News: Makeup Makes Women Appear More Competent: Study . The New York Times . 2011-10-12 . 2017-02-21 . 2017-04-17 . https://web.archive.org/web/20170417052732/http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/fashion/makeup-makes-women-appear-more-competent-study.html?_r=1 . live .
  51. Web site: FDA Authority Over Cosmetics: How Cosmetics Are Not FDA-Approved, but Are FDA-Regulated. https://web.archive.org/web/20140401084712/http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/GuidanceRegulation/LawsRegulations/ucm074162.htm. 1 April 2014. US Food and Drug Administration. 2 March 2022. 4 May 2025.
  52. Web site: EUR-Lex – co0013 – EN – EUR-Lex. europa.eu. 2022-02-21. 2015-05-08. https://web.archive.org/web/20150508131613/http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/consumers/product_labelling_and_packaging/co0013_en.htm. live.
  53. Web site: Cosmetics Labeling Claims . https://web.archive.org/web/20190912074451/https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-labeling/cosmetics-labeling-claims . 12 September 2019 . US Food and Drug Administration . 5 May 2025 . 21 November 2021.
  54. Frosch. P.J.. Pilz . B.. Andersen. K.E.. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multi-center study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes . Contact Derm. . 33 . 5 . 333–42 . November 1995 . 8565489 . 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02048.x. 44355890 . etal.
  55. Book: Contact Dermatitis . Johansen. Jeanne Duus . Frosch. Peter J. . Lepoittevin. Jean-Pierre . Springer . 2010 . March 13, 2014 . 978-3-642-03827-3 . August 5, 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200805102351/https://books.google.com/books?id=sSHIlWSOiroC&pg=PA556 . live .
  56. Book: Fisher, Alexander A. . Fisher's Contact Dermatitis . PMPH-USA . 2008 . 978-1-55009-378-0 . 2015-11-06 . 2020-08-05 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200805101125/https://books.google.com/books?id=dQBAzfyCeQ8C&pg=PA735 . live .
  57. Book: Andrew's Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology . William D. . James . Timothy . Berger . Dirk . Elston . Elsevier Health Sciences . 2011 . 978-1-4377-3619-9 . 2015-11-06 . 2018-05-17 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180517041148/https://books.google.com/books?id=Ef_HllqkdqEC&pg=PT514 . live .
  58. Book: Dermatotoxicology. Sixth. Zhai. Hongbo. Maibach. Howard I.. CRC Press. 2004. March 13, 2014. 978-0-203-42627-2. August 5, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200805090117/https://books.google.com/books?id=ORpbQRdlCpoC&pg=PA1042. live.
  59. Web site: Animal Testing & Cosmetics . https://web.archive.org/web/20190912074041/https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/product-testing-cosmetics/animal-testing-cosmetics . 12 September 2019 . US Food and Drug Administration . 5 May 2025 . 4 March 2022.
  60. Kabene. Stefane. Baadel. Said. 2019-11-12. Bioethics: a look at animal testing in medicine and cosmetics in the UK. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 12. 15. 10.18502/jmehm.v12i15.1875. 2008-0387. 7166243. 32328228.
  61. Book: Watson, Stephanie. Animal Testing: Issues and Ethics. The Rosen Publishing Group. New York. 2009. 978-1-4358-5671-4.
  62. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024059 . 21915280 . Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research . PLOS ONE . 6 . 9 . e24059 . 2011 . Ferdowsian . Hope R. . Beck . Nancy. 3168484 . 2011PLoSO...624059F . free .
  63. News: California Just Officially Banned The Sale Of Animal-Tested Cosmetics. Hanson. Hilary. 2018-09-29. Huffington Post. 2019-05-17. en-AU. 2019-05-17. https://web.archive.org/web/20190517160322/https://www.huffpost.com/entry/california-just-officially-banned-the-sale-of-animal-tested-cosmetics_n_5b913ac6e4b0cf7b003d5c09. live.
  64. Web site: Ban on Animal Testing – Growth – European Commission. Growth. en. 2018-10-26. 2016-07-05. 2018-10-26. https://web.archive.org/web/20181026182953/http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/cosmetics/animal-testing_en. live.
  65. News: E.U. Bans Cosmetics With Animal-Tested Ingredients. Kanter. James. 2013-03-11. The New York Times. 2019-05-17. en-US. 0362-4331. 2019-05-09. https://web.archive.org/web/20190509182353/https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/business/global/eu-to-ban-cosmetics-with-animal-tested-ingredients.html. live.
  66. Web site: Here's How China Is Moving Away From Animal Testing. 16 January 2018. www.bloomberg.com. 2019-05-13. 2019-05-17. https://web.archive.org/web/20190517160333/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-16/ending-china-animal-tests-is-salve-for-big-beauty-quicktake-q-a. live.
  67. Web site: China Will No Longer Require Animal Testing On Cosmetic Products. Morosini. Daniela. British Vogue. 10 April 2019. 2019-05-13. 2019-05-13. https://web.archive.org/web/20190513201237/https://www.vogue.co.uk/article/china-lifting-animal-testing-laws. live.
  68. Web site: Australia's animal testing laws are a good start, but don't go far enough. phys.org. en-us. 2019-05-17. 2019-05-17. https://web.archive.org/web/20190517160311/https://phys.org/news/2019-03-australia-animal-laws-good-dont.html. live.
  69. Web site: Australia bans use of data from animal tests in cosmetics. Jacobs. Steve. 2019-03-16. The Sydney Morning Herald. en. 2019-05-17. 2019-05-17. https://web.archive.org/web/20190517160311/https://www.smh.com.au/environment/sustainability/australia-bans-use-of-data-from-animal-tests-in-cosmetics-20190227-p510jo.html. live.
  70. Web site: Product safety for manufacturers. bis.gov.uk. 2022-02-21. 2012-11-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20121105052730/http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/consumer-issues/product-safety/cosmetic-products-safety-regulations-2008-as-amended. live.
  71. Web site: The Single Market. cosmeticseurope. 2021-07-01. 2021-06-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20210605202506/https://cosmeticseurope.eu/cosmetics-industry/understanding-cosmetics-regulation/. live.
  72. Web site: Regulatory context. 2010-08-04. ec.europa.eu. 2010-07-20. https://web.archive.org/web/20100720005200/http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/animal-testing/index_en.htm. live.
  73. Web site: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). fda.gov. 2019-12-16. 2017-03-18. https://web.archive.org/web/20170318023122/https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/default.htm.
  74. Web site: The 1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Food and Drug Administration. 22 April 2015. 2 May 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150502135903/http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/History/ProductRegulation/ucm132818.htm.
  75. Web site: Animal Testing & Cosmetics. Food and Drug Administration. 10 February 2017. 11 February 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170211084328/http://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/scienceresearch/producttesting/ucm072268.htm.
  76. Web site: Why your cosmetics don't have to be tested for safety . PBS . en . 16 December 2019 . 19 August 2020 . 2 October 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20201002162341/https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/why-your-cosmetics-dont-have-to-be-tested-for-safety . live .
  77. https://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=36437 ISO 22716