Names changed to protect the guilty

[John Machin]

MonkeeSage wrote:
> On Oct 6, 8:02 pm, "MonkeeSage" <MonkeeS... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > it is clearer to you to make the condition explicit ("blah not False"),
>
> "blah not False" -> "blah is False"

Whichever way your team wants to interpret it, d00d.

Please consider whether you should be writing "(blah is False) is
True", that would be more explicit.