On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:29:34 -0700, John Machin wrote:
>> MonkeeSage wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 8:02 pm, "MonkeeSage" <MonkeeS... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > it is clearer to you to make the condition explicit ("blah not False"),
>>>> "blah not False" -> "blah is False"
>> Whichever way your team wants to interpret it, d00d.
>> Please consider whether you should be writing "(blah is False) is
> True", that would be more explicit.
Puh-lease! Get it right!
It should be "((blah is False) is True) is True".
--
Steve.
