Authoritarianism
| Part of the Politics series |
| Basic forms of government |
|---|
| List of forms · List of countries |
|
|
Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in democracy, separation of powers, civil liberties, and the rule of law.[1][2] Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party, the military, or the concentration of power in a single person.[3][4] States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.[5][6][7]
The political scientist Juan Linz, in an influential[8] 1964 work, An Authoritarian Regime: Spain, defined authoritarianism as possessing four qualities:
- Limited political pluralism, which is achieved with constraints on the legislature, political parties and interest groups.
- Political legitimacy based on appeals to emotion and identification of the regime as a necessary evil to combat "easily recognizable societal problems, such as underdevelopment or insurgency."
- Minimal political mobilization, and suppression of anti-regime activities.
- Ill-defined executive powers, often vague and shifting, used to extend the power of the executive.[9][10]
Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.[11][12][13][14] Broadly defined, authoritarian states include countries that lack human rights such as freedom of religion, or countries in which the government and the opposition do not alternate in power at least once following free elections.[15] Authoritarian states might contain nominally democratic institutions such as political parties, legislatures and elections which are managed to entrench authoritarian rule and can feature fraudulent, non-competitive elections.[16]
Since 1946, the share of authoritarian states in the international political system increased until the mid-1970s but declined from then until 2000.[17] Prior to 2000, dictatorships typically began with a coup and replaced a pre-existing authoritarian regime.[18] Since 2000, dictatorships are most likely to begin through democratic backsliding whereby a democratically elected leader established an authoritarian regime.[18]
Characteristics
Authoritarianism is characterized by highly concentrated and centralized government power maintained by political repression and the exclusion of potential or supposed challengers by armed force. It uses political parties and mass organizations to mobilize people around the goals of the regime.[19] Adam Przeworski has theorized that "authoritarian equilibrium rests mainly on lies, fear and economic prosperity."[20]
Authoritarianism also tends to embrace the informal and unregulated exercise of political power, a leadership that is "self-appointed and even if elected cannot be displaced by citizens' free choice among competitors", the arbitrary deprivation of civil liberties and little tolerance for meaningful opposition.[19] A range of social controls also attempt to stifle civil society while political stability is maintained by control over and support of the armed forces, a bureaucracy staffed by the regime and creation of allegiance through various means of socialization and indoctrination.[19] Pippa Norris and Ronald Inglehart identify authoritarianism in politicians and political parties by looking for values of security, conformity, and obedience.[21]
Authoritarianism is marked by "indefinite political tenure" of the ruler or ruling party (often in a one-party state) or other authority.[19] The transition from an authoritarian system to a more democratic form of government is referred to as democratization.[19]
Constitution
Constitutions in authoritarian states may serve a variety of roles, including "operating manual" (describing how the government is to function); "billboard" (signal of regime's intent), "blueprint" (outline of future regime plans), and "window dressing" (material designed to obfuscate, such as provisions setting forth freedoms that are not honored in practice).[22] Authoritarian constitutions may help legitimize, strengthen, and consolidate regimes.[23] An authoritarian constitution "that successfully coordinates government action and defines popular expectations can also help consolidate the regime's grip on power by inhibiting re coordination on a different set of arrangements."[24] Unlike democratic constitutions, authoritarian constitutions do not set direct limits on executive authority; however, in some cases such documents may function as ways for elites to protect their own property rights or constrain autocrats' behavior.[25]
The Soviet Russia Constitution of 1918, the first charter of the new Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic (RSFSR), was described by Vladimir Lenin as a "revolutionary" document. It was, he said, unlike any constitution drafted by a nation-state.[26] The concept of "authoritarian constitutionalism" has been developed by legal scholar Mark Tushnet.[27] Tushnet distinguishes authoritarian constitutionalist regimes from "liberal constitutionalist" regimes ("the sort familiar in the modern West, with core commitments to human rights and self-governance implemented by means of varying institutional devices") and from purely authoritarian regimes (which reject the idea of human rights or constraints on leaders' power).[27] He describes authoritarian constitutionalist regimes as (1) authoritarian dominant-party states that (2) impose sanctions (such as libel judgments) against, but do not arbitrarily arrest, political dissidents; (3) permit "reasonably open discussion and criticism of its policies"; (4) hold "reasonably free and fair elections", without systemic intimidation, but "with close attention to such matters as the drawing of election districts and the creation of party lists to ensure as best it can that it will prevail – and by a substantial margin"; (5) reflect at least occasional responsiveness to public opinion; and (6) create "mechanisms to ensure that the amount of dissent does not exceed the level it regards as desirable." Tushnet cites Singapore as an example of an authoritarian constitutionalist state, and connects the concept to that of hybrid regimes.[27]
Current list of countries
The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples of states characterized as authoritarian, as seen in the sources in the Notes and references column. Countries listed also are not rated as democracies by The Economist Democracy Index, as 'free' by Freedom House's Freedom in the World index or reach a high score[clarification needed] at V-Dem Democracy Indices.
| State | Time period | Ruling group or person | Notes and references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996–2001; 2021– | Taliban | Totalitarian theocratic state. It has reached the last place in The Economist Democracy Index.[28] | |
| 1975– | MPLA | Authoritarian party system[29] | |
| 1993– | New Azerbaijan Party | Hereditary dictatorship[30][31][32][33][34][35] | |
| 1783– | House of Khalifa | Absolute monarchy[36] | |
| 1994– | Alexander Lukashenko | [37][38][39][40][41] | |
| 2005– | CNDD–FDD | Ethnic-based authoritarian rule[42] | |
| 1979– | Cambodian People's Party | [43][44] | |
| 1982– | Paul Biya | [45][46] | |
| 1990– | Déby family | Hereditary dictatorship under Déby family.[47] | |
| 1949– | Chinese Communist Party | China received 9 out of 100 points in Freedom House's 2024 Global Freedom Score.[48] The party promotes itself as 'consultative' on local issues and some scholars describe the Chinese system as "a fragmented authoritarianism" (Lieberthal), "a negotiated state", or "a consultative authoritarian regime."[improper synthesis?][49][50][51][52][53] | |
| 1969–1992; 1997– | Congolese Party of Labour | Under authoritarian ruler[54] | |
| 1959– | Castrism | Totalitarian ideology that maintains the one-party system[55] | |
| 1977– | People's Rally for Progress | [56][57] | |
| 2014– | Abdel Fattah el-Sisi | [58][59][60] | |
| 2019– | Nayib Bukele | [61][62] | |
| 1979– | Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo | [63] | |
| 1993–[a] | Isaias Afwerki | Eritrea is considered a totalitarian dictatorship without elections.[64] | |
| 1968– | House of Dlamini | Absolute monarchy[65] | |
| 2018– | Abiy Ahmed | Abiy Ahmed and his party considered "authoritarian" by some activists and dissents.[66] He is considered by some a "charming dictator".[67][68] | |
| 2020– | Pro-Beijing camp (Hong Kong) | Since the enactment of the Hong Kong National Security Law, the Hong Kong government began cracking down on pro-democracy activists, politicians, and news outlets, which is considered by many to be a sign of rising authoritarianism in Hong Kong.[69][70][71] | |
| 1979– | Assembly of Experts | After the Iranian Revolution, Iran became a totalitarian clerical state (nominally an "Islamic republic") based on the absolute authority of the unelected Supreme Leader of Iran, based on the strict Shia concept of Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist.If it has the opportunity, this legal body will remove reformist politicians.[72][73] In 2000, Juan José Linz wrote that "it is difficult to fit the Iranian regime into the existing typology, as it combines the ideological bent of totalitarianism with the limited pluralism of authoritarianism and holds regular elections in which candidates advocating differing policies and incumbents are often defeated."[74] | |
| 1996–1999; 2009–2021; 2022– |
Benjamin Netanyahu | Though officially a democratic state, its treatment of Palestinians have been seen as authoritarian.[75][76][77][78] | |
| 1946– | Hashemites | Semi-constitutional monarchy[79] | |
| 1975– | Lao People's Revolutionary Party | One party system[80] | |
| 2020– | Assimi Goita | Military dictatorship | |
| 1957– | Alaouite dynasty | Absolute monarchy[79][81][82] | |
| 1975– | FRELIMO | De-facto dominant party.[83] | |
| 1962– | Tatmadaw | The Tatmadaw allowed a democratically elected administration to exercise some power from 2016 to 2021, without allowing civilian control of the military.[84] | |
| 1979–1990; 2007– | Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo | [85][86] | |
| 1949– | Workers' Party of Korea under Kim Dynasty | Hereditary dictatorship. Some scholars consider North Korea to be the most totalitarian country.[87][88] | |
| 1970– | House of Al Said | Absolute monarchy[89] | |
| 1964– | Palestine Liberation Organization and Hamas | [90] | |
| 1971– | House of Thani | Absolute monarchy[91] | |
| 2000– | Vladimir Putin | Had continuously ruled since 2000 as both president and prime minister.[92][93][94][95][96][97] | |
| 2000– | Paul Kagame | Authoritarian ruler supported by own ethnic group[98] | |
| 1934– | House of Saud | Absolute monarchy.[99][100] | |
| 2012– | Serbian Progressive Party under Aleksandar Vučić | Dominant party system headed by populist-authoritarian leader[101] | |
| 2011– | Sudan People's Liberation Movement under Salva Kiir Mayardit | [102] | |
| 2021– | Abdel Fattah al-Burhan | Military junta[103] | |
| 1994– | Emomali Rahmon | [104] | |
| 1967– | Eyadema Family | Hereditary dictatorship. After reaching the term limit, Gnassingbe transformed the presidential system into a parliamentary one with himself at the head of the council of ministers.[105] | |
| 2019– | Kais Saied | See also 2019 Tunisian presidential election and 2021 Tunisian self-coup. | |
| 2003– | Justice and Development Party under Recep Tayyip Erdoğan | It has been described by observers as a "competitive authoritarian regime". Erdoğan changed the parliamentary system to a presidential one with him as president.[106][107] | |
| 2006– | Berdimuhamedow Family | Effectively a totalitarian hereditary dictatorship.[108][109] | |
| 1971– | Royal families of the United Arab Emirates | Effective diarchic monarchies[110][111] | |
| 2017–2021; 2025– | Donald Trump | See also Trumpism. [112] | |
| 1986– | Yoweri Museveni | Autocratic ruler[113] | |
| 1989– | Uzbekistan Liberal Democratic Party | [114][115][116] | |
| 1999– | Chavismo under Delcy Rodríguez[b] | [117][118] | |
| 1976– | Vietnamese Communist Party | Sole party system[119] | |
| 1980– | ZANU-PF | Authoritarian party system[120][121] |
Historical
The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples of states which were historically authoritarian.
| State | Time period | Ruling group or person | Notes and references |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1946–1992 | One party rule under Enver Hoxha and Ramiz Alia | [122] | |
| 1999–2019 | Abdelaziz Bouteflika | [123] | |
| 1946–1955 | Justicialist Party under Juan Perón | See also Peronism.[124][125] | |
| 1966–1973 | Military government | See also the Argentine Revolution.[124][125] | |
| 1973–1976 | Justicialist Party under Juan and Isabel Perón | [124][125] | |
| 1976–1983 | Jorge Rafael Videla | See also the National Reorganization Process.[124][125] | |
| 1933–1938 | Christian Social Party under Engelbert Dollfuß and Fatherland Front under Kurt Schuschnigg | See also the Federal State of Austria and Ständestaat. | |
| 2009–2024 | Awami League under Sheikh Hasina | [126] | |
| 1937–1945 | Getúlio Vargas | See also the Vargas Era.[127] | |
| 1964–1985 | Military dictatorship in Brazil | Started with the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état.[127] | |
| 1878–1944 | House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha-Koháry.
Later de facto authoritarian rule under Boris III |
Authoritarian rule more prevalent after 1935 after the counter-coup to the 1934 coup d'état[128] | |
| 1944–1990 | Communist one-party state rule, particularly under Todor Zhivkov | [129] | |
| 1962–2011 | Military government and the Burma Socialist Programme Party | Started with the 1962 Burmese coup d'état and ended with the 2011–2012 Burmese political reforms.[130] | |
| 1961–1993 | UPRONA | [citation needed] | |
| 1861–1865 | Jefferson Davis | Herrenvolk republic with a "democracy of the white race".[131][132] | |
| 1982–1990 | Hissène Habré | Habré was deposed by Idriss Déby, he was tried in Senegal for crimes against his country and died in prison months after the man who removed him from power died in combat. | |
| 1973–1990 | Government Junta under Augusto Pinochet | Started with the 1973 Chilean coup d'état.[133] | |
| 1927–1949 | Kuomintang and Nationalist government under Chiang Kai-shek | The Republic of China on Taiwan is listed further below. | |
| 1975–1979 | Khmer Rouge rule of Cambodia under Pol Pot | Totalitarian one-party regime that instigated the Cambodian genocide.[134] | |
| 1997–2019 | Laurent-Désiré Kabila and Joseph Kabila | Zaire is listed further below.[135] | |
| 1941–1945 | Ustaše under Ante Pavelić | See also Independent State of Croatia | |
| 1990–1999 | Croatian Democratic Union under Franjo Tuđman | [136][137] | |
| 1938–1939 | Party of National Unity | [citation needed] | |
| 1952–2011 | Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar Sadat, and Hosni Mubarak | [138] | |
| 1968–1979 | Francisco Macias Nguema | [citation needed] | |
| 1974–1991 | Mengistu Haile Mariam and the Workers' Party of Ethiopia | [139] | |
| 1991–2019 | Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front | [140] | |
| 2006–2022 | FijiFirst[c] | [141][142][143][144] | |
| 1793–1794 | Committee of Public Safety, a provisional government during the Reign of Terror under Maximilien Robespierre. | See also the French Revolution. | |
| 1961–2023 | Gabonese Democratic Party | Ali Bongo is overthrown in a military coup. | |
| 1994–2017 | Yahya Jammeh | Jammeh is overthrown by democratic elections and is forced to resign. | |
| 1933–1945 | National Socialist German Workers' Party | See also Nazism. | |
| 1936–1941 | Fascist rule under Ioannis Metaxas | [citation needed] | |
| 1967–1974 | Military junta under Constantine II, Georgios Zoitakis, and Georgios Papadopoulos | [citation needed] | |
| 1958–2021 | Ahmed Sekou Touré, Lansana Conté, Moussa Dadis Camara and Alpha Condé | Guinea was marked by a series of authoritarian rulers who denounced previous regimes on democratic issues. | |
| 1980–1999 | João Bernardo Vieira | Nino Vieira would govern in an authoritarian manner in the 80s and 90s until his overthrow, in 2005 he returned to the presidency until his assassination in 2009. | |
| 1920–1944 | Miklós Horthy and the Unity Party | [145] | |
| 2010–2026 | Fidesz under Viktor Orbán | Dominant party system headed by populist-authoritarian leader.[146][147] See also Orbanism. | |
| 1959–1998 | Sukarno and Suharto | See also the Guided Democracy era and the New Order. | |
| 1925–1979 | Pahlavi dynasty | [148] | |
| 1968–2003 | Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region under Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr and Saddam Hussein | ||
| 1922–1943 | National Fascist Party | [149] | |
| 1931–1945 | Hirohito and the Imperial Rule Assistance Association | ||
| 1886–1980 | True Whig Party | Party that ruled Liberia for more than 100 years and the monopoly was overthrown by the 1980 Liberian coup. | |
| 1980–1990 | Samuel Doe | The Liberian president ends up captured and executed for a long time in the middle of a Civil war. | |
| 1990–2022 | Amanat | Formerly named Nur Otan. The incumbent president Kassym-Jomart Tokayev renounced his party membership, establishing in the amendments of the second republic that no president should have affiliation with any party.[45] | |
| 1969–2011 | Muammar Gaddafi | Started with the 1969 Libyan coup d'état and ended with the 2011 Libyan Civil War.[150] | |
| 1926–1940 | Antanas Smetona | Ended in the Soviet occupation.[151] | |
| 2006–2016 | Nikola Gruevski | [152][153] | |
| 1968–1991 | Moussa Traoré | Moussa is deposed in the 1991 Malian coup d'état and sentenced to death twice, exonerated in May 2002. | |
| 1630–1691 |