Description
This virtual PASS course is open to ISA members & non-members.
AI can now write a policy memo, analyze a case study, and produce a polished research paper in minutes. For international studies faculty, the essays, briefs, and take-home exams that once showed learning no longer prove a student did the thinking. This course offers a practical response. Instead of trying to catch AI use, it moves assessment toward something AI cannot supply: a student's ability to explain, adapt, and defend their own work.
The goal is to help faculty verify student understanding in any course format, including fully online and asynchronous courses. Participants will explore four strategies from the "Grade the Human, Not the Homework" framework. Each one evaluates a student's understanding of their submitted work rather than grading the artifact alone.
Each strategy is illustrated with international studies examples, so participants can apply the strategies to their own courses right away. The session also addresses the questions faculty raise most often: how much instructor time these methods take, how to score them consistently, and how to keep them fair and accessible for all students.
Participants are encouraged to bring their most AI-vulnerable assignment, such as an essay, policy memo, or take-home exam. You'll use it during the session to plan how to apply one strategy to your own course.
Objectives
By the end of this workshop, participants will be able to:
- Identify which of their current assignments are most vulnerable to AI misuse, and explain why.
- Explain the four strategies in the Grade the Human framework and how each one moves assessment from the product to the student.
- Choose the strategies that best fit their own discipline, class size, and modality.
- Describe how they will use at least one strategy in a course they are teaching now.
Audience
This course is open to faculty in any discipline, at any career stage, including graduate students who teach or assist with courses. The four strategies work with any assignment that asks students to produce evidence of learning, from essays and research papers to problem sets and exams. Examples are drawn from international studies, political science, and international relations, and each one is designed to transfer easily to other fields. The strategies work in online, hybrid, and in-person courses, from small seminars to large lectures. No prior experience with AI is required. Department chairs and curriculum leaders will also find the framework useful.
Instructor's Background
Ashley Evans is a tenured Professor of Software Development and Cloud Computing at Valencia College. For nine years, she has designed and taught fully online, asynchronous courses, where AI misuse is hardest to detect. She developed "Grade the Human, Not the Homework" by testing its four strategies in her own classes, where she replaced lab reports, final exams, and projects with validation quizzes, oral exams, and defenses of work. Her article on the framework appears in The Teaching Professor. Through her consulting practice, Teach AI Ready, she has worked with faculty at many institutions across the US and presented AI-ready teaching strategies to more than 1,000 educators.
Agenda
| 10:30 | Welcome and Framing (10 minutes) Discussion and Poll: How AI's growing capabilities have changed what a submitted assignment can prove. |
| 10:40 | The Shift: From Product to Person (20 minutes) Discussion: Why assessing understanding matters more than who produced the artifact. Results from field-testing these strategies in fully online courses. |
| 11:00 | The Four Strategies (25 minutes) Demonstration of human-based assessment strategies, each with how it works and examples from international studies. |
| 11:25 | Time Shifts (10 minutes) Discussion and Poll: How the redesigned grading workload compares with current practice. |
| 11:45 | Sample Assignment Redesign (20 minutes) All four strategies applied to two international studies sample assignments. |
| 12:05 | Applications and Q&A (15 minutes) Rules that keep these strategies fair and accessible. Participants draft a plan for using one strategy with their own assignment. Open questions and discussion. |